Representations of SU(2) are equivalent to their duals

In summary, the conversation discusses the difficulty in proving the equivalence of irreducible representations of SU(2) with their dual representations. The representations in question are the spaces of homogeneous polynomials in 2 complex variables of degree 2j. The discussion also delves into the concept of dual spaces and how to combine an element of the dual space with the original space to get a number. The basis for the space of polynomials is discussed, as well as the action of an element of SU(2) on the polynomials. The conversation also raises questions about ways to work with the new polynomials and how to show the action of an element of SU(2) is one-to-one and onto. Finally, the concept of a double
  • #1
arg
3
0
Hi.
I am having trouble proving that the irreducible representations of SU(2) are equivalent to their dual representations.
The reps I am looking at are the spaces of homogenous polynomials in 2 complex variables of degree 2j (where j is 0, 1/2, 1,...). If f is such a polynomial the action of an element g of SU(2) is to take [tex]f[/tex] to
[tex]f(g^{-1} \left(
\begin{array}{cc}
x\\
y \end{array}
\right) ) [/tex]
What is the dual space of this set of polynomials and how do you combine an element of the dual space with the original space to get a number?
I can find no proof of the equivalence of a representation with its dual. If anyone has any insight please let me know. Please let me know if I need to clarify anything.
Thanks very much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That set of polynomials is _just_ a vector space. So write down the obvious basis, hence te dual basis, and now what is the action of SU(2)?
 
  • #3
Hi Matt. Thanks for your quick reply.

So if the degree of the homogenous polynomials is n the basis is:
[tex]x^n, x^{n-1}y, x^{n-2}y^2, ... , xy^{n-1}, y^n[/tex] so it is an n+1 dimensional vector space.
I guess the dual basis are the n+1 1-forms, the jth of which eats [tex]x^ky^{n-k}[/tex] and spits out 1 if k=j and 0 otherwise.
The way I understand the action of an element g of SU(2) on the polynomial [tex]f(x,y)[/tex] is to take the matrix [tex]g^{-1}[/tex] and multiply it on the right by the column vector [tex]\left(\begin{array}(x\\y\end{array} \right)[/tex]. Then you get another column vector. Take the top element of this vector and plug it into the x-slot in f(x,y) and plug the bottom element of the vector into the y-slot. Now if you multiply everything out and regroup the terms you have another homogenous polynomial of degree n.
At this point I have several questions. Is there a way to work with these new polynomials without multiplying everything out by hand? How does one show that the action of g on this space of polynomials is 1-1 and onto? How can I come up with a good map from this space of polynomials to the dual space?

Thanks a lot.
 
  • #4
The double dual of V is what you started with...
 
  • #5
I don't follow you. Can you be a bit more specific? Do you mean that the basis I listed is not the basis of the homogeneous polynomials of two complex variables? Thanks.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Representations of SU(2) are equivalent to their duals

What does it mean for a representation of SU(2) to be equivalent to its dual?

In mathematics, a representation of a group is a way of associating mathematical objects, such as matrices or functions, to elements of the group. The dual of a representation is a related representation that "dualizes" the original one, meaning that it switches the roles of inputs and outputs. In the case of SU(2), a representation being equivalent to its dual means that the two representations are essentially the same, but with different input and output variables.

How is the equivalence of representations of SU(2) related to the group's structure?

The group SU(2) has a special property called self-duality, which means that its representations are equivalent to their duals. This property is closely related to the group's compactness and its Lie algebra structure. In fact, the self-duality of SU(2) is a consequence of its Lie algebra being isomorphic to its dual algebra.

What are the practical applications of studying representations of SU(2)?

The group SU(2) is a fundamental mathematical object that appears in many areas of physics and mathematics, such as quantum mechanics, spin systems, and topology. The study of its representations and their equivalences is important for understanding the symmetries and properties of these systems. It also has applications in engineering and computer science, particularly in the fields of signal processing and control theory.

Can you give an example of an equivalent representation of SU(2) and its dual?

One example of an equivalent representation of SU(2) and its dual is the spin-1/2 representation, which is widely used in quantum mechanics. In this representation, the group elements of SU(2) are represented by 2x2 matrices, and the dual representation involves switching the roles of the input and output variables. This is equivalent to the representation where the group elements are represented by the same 2x2 matrices, but with the input and output variables switched.

Are representations of SU(2) always equivalent to their duals?

No, not all representations of SU(2) are equivalent to their duals. The self-duality of SU(2) only applies to its irreducible representations, which are the building blocks of all other representations. Reducing a representation to its irreducible components can reveal whether it is self-dual or not. Additionally, representations of other groups may or may not exhibit self-duality, depending on the group's structure.

Similar threads

Back
Top