Residues of Poles in Upper Half Plane for $f(z)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Poles
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the residues of the poles for the function f(z) = ze^(iz)/(z^4 + α^4) in the upper half-plane, where α > 0. The denominator factors into (z^2 + iα^2)(z^2 - iα^2), leading to four simple poles: ±α and ±iα. There is confusion regarding the nature of the poles and the correct factorization method, with participants suggesting different approaches, including using exponential forms. The residues can be calculated using the standard limit method at the identified poles. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of careful factorization and residue evaluation techniques in complex analysis.
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
for the function f(z)=\frac{ze^{iz}}{z^4+\alpha^4}, \alpha>0

what are the residues of the poles in the upper half plane

so i factorised the denominator to (z^2+i \alpha^2)(z^2-i \alpha^2)
my problems are:

(i)but then i wasn't sure how to characterise this the z^2 had me confused as to whether these were simple poles or dobule poles?

(ii)also the question said "poleS" in the upper half plane making me think there was more than 1?

(iii) i don't know how to proceed without being able to get the denominator into the form of (z-a)(z-b) or something along those lines

can anybody help me here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep factoring (factorizing [sic]). Hint: i=exp(i*pi/2).
 
i get z^2+i \alpha^2=(z+ie^{\frac{i \pi}{4}} \alpha)(z-ie^\frac{{i \pi}{4}} \alpha)=(z-\alpha)(z+\alpha)
so poles at +/-alpha

the other term in the denominator gives poles at +/-i alpha.

so we have four simple poles and then it should be easy to get residues etc.

would there have been an easier way to factorise this that would have avoided dealing with exponentials?
 
latentcorpse said:
i get z^2+i \alpha^2=(z+ie^{\frac{i \pi}{4}} \alpha)(z-ie^\frac{{i \pi}{4}} \alpha)=(z-\alpha)(z+\alpha)
Ahhh, \alpha is NOT equal to ie^{\frac{i\pi}{4}}\alpha. Why would you think it was?
ie^{\pi/4}= i(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}+ i\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2})= -\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}+ i\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}

so poles at +/-alpha

the other term in the denominator gives poles at +/-i alpha.

so we have four simple poles and then it should be easy to get residues etc.

would there have been an easier way to factorise this that would have avoided dealing with exponentials?
The fourth roots of -\alpha lie on a circle in the complex plane with radius \alpha^{1/4} and center at 0. Since the argument of -1 is \pi the arguments of the fourth roots of -\alpha are \pi/4, 3\pi/4, 5\pi/4, and 7\pi/4. The first two of those are in the upper half plane.
 
my bad. i was still working with e^{\frac{i \pi}{2}} and so just used i*i and i*(-i). a lesson in taking your time. ok so then i just evalueate the residues of simples poles as usual i.e.

now if i let Q=-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} then the residue at Q can be obtained by

\lim_{z \rightarrow Q} \frac{(z-Q)(ze^{iz})}{z^4+\alpha^4} yes?

secondly,
could i also have found the poles by considering the fourth roots of -\alpha^4 and using de Moivre then like youy did above? (or would it be the fourth roots of \alpha^4 - I'm inclined to go with the first but would like to double check)

thanks.
 
surely multiplying by z-Q on the top is going to leave a whole bunch of crap on the denominator and its going to get very messy!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K