MHB Result of an increased % when ONLY the result of the OLD % is known

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhazaa
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a math problem regarding a tax rate increase of half a percent for a business that previously paid $20,000 in taxes. Participants agree that without knowing the initial tax rate or the taxable amount, it's impossible to determine the new tax amount accurately. Two scenarios illustrate that the increase in tax depends on the taxed amount, leading to different results. The conclusion is that a unique solution cannot be provided without additional information. The conversation highlights the importance of context in solving percentage increase problems.
mhazaa
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi (first time post)

I got this from a bank of questions that leads me to believe this SHOULD be easy- but the solution is not coming to me:

The tax rate for businesses was increased by half of 1%. If a business was paying 20 000 dollars in taxes before the increase, how much would the business pay after the increase?

(I know it's not a direct function of the 20 000 dollars)

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, mhazaa! :D

It seems we need another piece of information here...are you given either the initial tax rate or the amount on which the business is being taxed?
 
Hi - thanks for responding

That was my initial thought, but no, that's it! I copied the question verbatum.

(It's from a high school textbook!)
 
Let's take a look at two different scenarios in which the tax amount is 20 (in thousands of dollars).

Case 1:

Taxed amount: 2000
Tax rate: 1%

Case 2:

Taxed amount: 1000
Tax rate: 2%

In case 1, if we increase the tax rate to 1.5%, then the increase in tax is 10. But, in case 2, if we increase the tax rate to 2.5%, then the increase in tax is 5. So, we see that the change in tax is a function of the taxed amount $A$. We in fact find that the new tax amount $T$ would be given by:

$$T=20+0.005A$$

So, without knowing the taxed amount either directly, or by inferring it from knowing the initial tax rate, we cannot give a unique solution to this problem. :D
 
:)

I approached it the exact same way (and came to the conclusion that *I* couldn't do it... But my level of math/math confidence didn't allow me to conclude that "it" couldn't be done!

I'm actually pleased to have the confirmation!

Thanks.

(now... watch somebody do it!)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top