Resultant Vector of magnetic fields

In summary, the reason for the magnetic force vector being perpendicular to the magnetic field vector and the velocity vector of a charged particle is simply defined that way. This can be seen experimentally and is also derived from Maxwell's equations. While relativity can be involved in the derivation, it is not necessary and the magnetic force can also be explained using Lagrangian mechanics.
  • #1
DaGza
1
0
For what reason is a magnetic force vector perpendicular to the magnetic field vector and the velocity vector of a charged particle? I know F=qvBsin and how to compute cross products but why does the force make a particle move in that particular direction? Is relativity involved?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, relativity is not involved.

The only reasonable way to answer "For what reason is a magnetic force vector perpendicular to the magnetic field vector" is "that's the way it is defined". A magnetic "field" is not a "physical" thing- it is simply a way of caculating the force on an object at any point. Experimentally, it can be seen that the force on a charged particle in a magnetic field depends upon its velocity: the velocity vector has to be taken into account. About the only simple way of "multiplying" two vectors to get a third vector is cross product: the magnetic field is DEFINED in such a way that the cross product gives the correct direction.


(Well, in a sense relativity is involved- because the magnetic force depends on velocity, it would seem that experiments with magnetic fields should violate "Gallilean Relativity"- that no experiment in a closed room will distinguish between not moving or moving at a constant velocity. That lead to the Michelson-Morley experiment to try to do such an experiment which in turn lead to "Einsteinian Relativity".)
 
  • #3
HallsofIvy said:
No, relativity is not involved."

That's debatable. Many physicists hold that the Lorentz Force can be dervived from Coulomb's law using relativity. However I don't believe that's true myself. To do that one starts with Maxwell's equations and relativity. One then derives the transformation law for both the electric and magnetic fields and the force. It is then shown that the Lorentz force results. However MAxwell's equations are based on laws in which dictate that the magnetic force is qvxB.

It should be noted that this type of phenomena is not limited to EM. In fact the Coriolis force is of this type in that the Coriolis force proportional to the cross product of velocity and the angular velocity of the frame of reference.

In fact for any system for which there is a Lagrangian L = T - U where U is the generalized potential where U is linearly proportional to velocity. The force of such a system is of the same form as the Lorentz force.
 

FAQ: Resultant Vector of magnetic fields

What is a resultant vector of magnetic fields?

A resultant vector of magnetic fields is a single vector that represents the combined effect of multiple magnetic fields acting on a point in space. It is calculated by adding together the individual vectors of the magnetic fields using the principles of vector addition.

How do you calculate the resultant vector of magnetic fields?

To calculate the resultant vector of magnetic fields, you must first determine the individual magnitudes and directions of the magnetic fields. Then, using the principles of vector addition, you can add the vectors together to find the resultant vector.

What is the difference between a resultant vector and a magnetic field intensity?

A resultant vector is a single vector that represents the combined effect of multiple magnetic fields, while magnetic field intensity refers to the strength of a single magnetic field at a specific point in space. The resultant vector takes into account the direction and magnitude of all the individual magnetic fields, while magnetic field intensity only considers the strength of one field.

Can the resultant vector of magnetic fields be negative?

Yes, the resultant vector of magnetic fields can be negative. This means that the magnetic fields are acting in opposite directions and cancel each other out. A negative resultant vector indicates a net decrease in the overall magnetic field strength.

How is the resultant vector of magnetic fields useful in practical applications?

The resultant vector of magnetic fields is useful in practical applications because it allows us to analyze and understand the combined effects of multiple magnetic fields. This is particularly important in fields such as electrical engineering and physics, where magnetic fields play a crucial role in the functioning of devices and systems.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top