Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept: A High-Energy Weapon for the Future

In summary: The problem with energy output being omnidirectional is that over half of your energy is directed away from your target, thus being a waste.Only evidence of high energy weapons in the news/ mass media are microwave beams or high intensity lasers. Also GeV-energy neutral particle (neutral hydrogen atom) beams. These are not deflected by the Earth's magnetic field.Bob SAlso GeV-energy neutral particle (neutral hydrogen atom) beams. These are not deflected by the Earth's magnetic field.Understood.
  • #1
lamonster
22
0
had this idea a while back, but its basically like a large penning trap. its just a basic concept so bare with me.
you construct a penning trap, but in a spherical shape instead of the classic penning design, which is similar to a magnetron. having each containing magnet positioned in series on the outer faces of the sphere. how you get the electrons in there at such high concentrations was the hard part, but i think i have a rough idea. it works kinda like a fuel injection system in a car. you bore a hole in the center of one of the containment magnets, making sure its magnetic field is pointed in the right direction so as not to force them back into the injector.
uses? maybe a large capacitor, or... wait for it. an electron bomb, or better known as an E-bomb. now it might sound crude but slap some high explosives on that thing, put it a few miles above your target and there you go.

plausible?

had an idea to allow it to be more power efficient by making it a toroidal shape, but then it might loose its "umph" and it'll just look like a containment ring for an accelerator...

also, tell me if I'm wrong with this one. don't you need equal or greater power to contain electrons then are actually inside this contraption? if that's true i just spent allot of useless time... sad.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That would be called a "directed energy weapon"
Electrons are not suitable for this at long distances. They spread apart VERY quickly in open space due to mutual repulsion.
Other, more suitable particles and/or techniques are used for this.
 
  • #3
pallidin said:
That would be called a "directed energy weapon"
Electrons are not suitable for this at long distances. They spread apart VERY quickly in open space due to mutual repulsion.
Other, more suitable particles and/or techniques are used for this.
Well there was a crude emp design in a POP sci article back in 01 (or maybe it was 03).

more Suitable? Only evidence of high energy weapons in the news/ mass media are microwave beams or high intensity lasers. (obviously this excludes nuclear weapons) There was an article I found about emp weapons, it had a "design" claimed to be use by the armed forces. Just a coil with a buttload of energy and a high explosive. Said it was a microwave type emp.

My design isn't as "slap together" but it can output way more energy while being omni-directional. back In my high school years I actually figured out the potential energy output, but my memory isn't delivering at the moment :/ I'm going to have to look for them and post it.
 
  • #4
lamonster said:
Well there was a crude emp design in a POP sci article back in 01 (or maybe it was 03).

more Suitable? Only evidence of high energy weapons in the news/ mass media are microwave beams or high intensity lasers. (obviously this excludes nuclear weapons) There was an article I found about emp weapons, it had a "design" claimed to be use by the armed forces. Just a coil with a buttload of energy and a high explosive. Said it was a microwave type emp.

My design isn't as "slap together" but it can output way more energy while being omni-directional. back In my high school years I actually figured out the potential energy output, but my memory isn't delivering at the moment :/ I'm going to have to look for them and post it.

The problem with energy output being omnidirectional is that over half of your energy is directed away from your target, thus being a waste.
 
  • #5
lamonster said:
Only evidence of high energy weapons in the news/ mass media are microwave beams or high intensity lasers.
Also GeV-energy neutral particle (neutral hydrogen atom) beams. These are not deflected by the Earth's magnetic field.

Bob S
 
  • #6
Bob S said:
Also GeV-energy neutral particle (neutral hydrogen atom) beams. These are not deflected by the Earth's magnetic field.

Bob S
Understood.
Cool thing about this type of weapon is you don't need Is hrapnel, you don't need tons of high explosives, all there needs to be is a "blastwave" effect, while its output strength isj strictly based on the Target area and the Target depth for ground penitration. Also, if calibrated right it has the potential for a huge microwave pulse.
 

FAQ: Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept: A High-Energy Weapon for the Future

What is the "Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept"?

The Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept is a high-energy weapon that utilizes a burst of electrons to generate a powerful and destructive electromagnetic pulse (EMP). It is designed to be a more efficient and compact version of traditional EMP weapons.

How does the Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept work?

The bomb works by releasing a burst of electrons into the atmosphere, which then interact with the Earth's magnetic field to create a powerful electromagnetic pulse. This pulse can disrupt electronic equipment and infrastructure, rendering them inoperable.

What makes the Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept different from traditional EMP weapons?

The main difference is in the delivery system. Traditional EMP weapons use a nuclear explosion to produce the electromagnetic pulse, while the Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept uses a burst of electrons, making it a non-nuclear weapon. It is also designed to be more compact and precise, allowing for more targeted attacks.

What are the potential uses of the Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept?

The bomb could potentially be used in military operations to disable enemy electronics and infrastructure, as well as in disaster relief efforts to restore communication and power systems. It could also potentially be used as a deterrent against cyber attacks on critical infrastructure.

What are the potential risks or drawbacks of the Revolutionary Electron Bomb Concept?

There are concerns about the potential for unintended consequences and collateral damage, as well as the possibility for misuse or abuse of the weapon. Additionally, the effects of the EMP may not be limited to just the intended target and could disrupt electronics in nearby areas as well.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Back
Top