Riccati Equation. Unsure what substitution to use

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trestal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Riccati equation y' = y^2 + x^2 and the challenge of finding an appropriate substitution for y to linearize it. A suggested substitution leads to the second-order linear ODE (d²f/dx²) + x²f(x) = 0, which can be solved using Bessel functions. The solution for f involves Bessel functions of the first kind, expressed as f = c1 x^1/2 J 1/4 (1/2 x^2) + c2 x^1/2 J -1/4 (1/2 x^2). To revert to y, one must differentiate f and substitute back into y = -f'/f, resulting in a fraction involving Bessel functions. This method provides a closed-form expression for the solution.
Trestal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have the equation
y' = y^2 + x^2 and am asked to linearise the equation with the appropriate substitution and then solve the resulting 2nd order linear equation.

My issue is I am unsure what to substitute in for y. I can't seem to find a choice for y which the differential will be a higher order so that I can make the aux equation to solve for some value c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hl!

Let y(x) = -(1/f(x))*(df/dx)
leads to (d²f/dx²)+x²f(x)=0
 
once you have the second order linear ODE, how do you solve it and then get back to the original Riccati equation? I tried power series method but it looks messy and I'm not sure if it's right, I then tried expressing as a Bessel function and get f= c1 x^1/2 J 1/4 (1/2 x^2) + c2 x^1/2 J -1/4 (1/2 x^2), but then how to return to a function in y?
 
Going back to the power series soln, I get a soln for f, then I differentiated f and then substituted it all back into y = -1 f'/f to get a soln for y. The soln for y has power series on numerator and denominator and have different powers of x thru it.
 
Hi !
I agree with your result :
f= c1 x^1/2 J 1/4 (1/2 x^2) + c2 x^1/2 J -1/4 (1/2 x^2)
To return to a function in y, you have to derivate f(x) and bring it back into y = -f'/f
This will leads to a fraction in which the numerator and the denominator are the sum of Bessel fonctions. This is the simplest way to express the result on a closed form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
396
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K