- #1
Malamala
- 309
- 27
Hello! If I have a molecule in Hund case a, I can write its wavefunction (electronic + rotational) as ##|e,\Lambda,\Omega,S>|J,\Sigma,\Lambda,\Omega,M>##. I am not sure what happens if I apply, say, ##S_+## on this wavefunction (assuming I am not applying it to the top of the ladder), where this is the raising operator in the molecule frame. In principle this should give: ##|e,\Lambda,\Omega,S>|J,\Sigma+1,\Lambda,\Omega,M>##. However initially I had, ##\Omega= \Sigma + \Lambda##, but now I would have ##\Omega= \Sigma + 1 + \Lambda##, which doesn't make sense. Given that by definition ##\Omega= \Sigma + \Lambda##, I would expect that applying ##S_+## would also turn ##\Omega## to ##\Omega+1##, but in many books I see that the ##S_+## operator is usually multiplied by ##J_-##, which is the rising operator for ##\Omega## (it is "-" because I work in the molecule frame and the signs are inverted). But if that is the case, my previous argument doesn't hold anymore. So my questions is, if I apply ##S_+##, do I need to apply ##J_-##, too, such that the ##\Omega## is consistent with ##\Omega= \Sigma + \Lambda##? And if so, why isn't ##\Omega## automatically changed by 1 when I apply ##S_+##? Does it even make sense mathematically to apply ##S_+## alone at all given this? Thank you!