- #1
Kevin_Axion
- 913
- 2
As I see it, there are two primary branches I can take to study and have a career in nanotechnology. There is the nanoengineering degree and the physics and mathematics degree. There are many merits on both sides namely:
Nanoengineering:
More employable without need of PhD
Lack of of full-exposure to the Physics
Already concentrated
Physics and Mathematics:
Not very employable without PhD
Lack of exposure to the breadth of experimentation (manipulating objects and the like)
Many people would question the existence of a nanoengineering degree but U of Toronto has one: http://nano.uoftengineering.com/ . What I want is an exposure to the physics and also be capable of being employable after an undergraduate degree. For instance in the nanoengineering degree I will only have one QM course where as in Physics I will have three. So which approach would others find more satisfying and valuable as I can't decide between them. If I wish to become a nanoengineer, which would be the better route? I've also heard that Eng Sci Nano Option is extraordinarily difficult and they learn the same physics that Physics majors learn in year 2, in year 3 and 4. Also where is there more employability or advancements in research in either Condensed Matter Physics or Nanotechnology (although they overlap).
Nanoengineering:
More employable without need of PhD
Lack of of full-exposure to the Physics
Already concentrated
Physics and Mathematics:
Not very employable without PhD
Lack of exposure to the breadth of experimentation (manipulating objects and the like)
Many people would question the existence of a nanoengineering degree but U of Toronto has one: http://nano.uoftengineering.com/ . What I want is an exposure to the physics and also be capable of being employable after an undergraduate degree. For instance in the nanoengineering degree I will only have one QM course where as in Physics I will have three. So which approach would others find more satisfying and valuable as I can't decide between them. If I wish to become a nanoengineer, which would be the better route? I've also heard that Eng Sci Nano Option is extraordinarily difficult and they learn the same physics that Physics majors learn in year 2, in year 3 and 4. Also where is there more employability or advancements in research in either Condensed Matter Physics or Nanotechnology (although they overlap).
Last edited by a moderator: