Rocket Velocity Calculation for Different Time Intervals

  • Thread starter elpermic
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Book
In summary: I went through the entire thread looking for the word "speed" and I found none! I think I must be hallucinating.
  • #1
elpermic
29
0

Homework Statement


A rocket carrying a satellite is accelerating straight up from the Earth's surface. At 1.35 s after liftoff, the rocket clears the top of its launch platform. After an additional 4.45s it is 1.00km above the ground. Calculate the magnitude of the average velocity of the rocket for a) the 4.45-s part of its flight; b) the first 5.80s of its flight.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



A)I did a and kept on getting 225. (1063-63)/(5.80-1.35)=225
B) I don't get B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The problem isn't very clear

do you have to assume constant accelaration for some part or all of the flight?

the altitude of the launch platfrom is 63m?

the rocket is at 1 km above the ground after 5.8s. part B seems simple.
 
  • #3
Where did the 63 come from? Is this the height of the launch platform and was it given?
You use v = d/t, or d = vt, which is not correct for accelerated motion.
Rather d = Vi*t + .5*a*t^2 should be used (assuming acceleration is constant).

My method was to use the letter d for the vertical distance traveled in the first 1.35s.
Using that v = formula for accelerated motion on the first 1.35 s of flight, I got a relationship between d and the acceleration.
Using the formula again for the next 4.45 s, I got another relationship between d and a.
Combining the two, I was able to find both d and a. I did not get your 63 m for d.
Having these values made it easy to find the velocities at times 0, 1.35 and 5.8, so simply adding two of them and dividing by 2 gave the average velocity in any interval. I got the 225 m/s value for the 4.45 s interval.
 
  • #4
63 is the top of the launch platform
 
  • #5
Knowing the 63 m at time 1.35 makes a big difference in the question!
My assumption of constant acceleration is wrong - you can easily calculate the acceleration over the two time intervals and you get different answers.
Indeed, rockets increase their acceleration as they burn off fuel and decrease their mass.

The question only asks for average velocities and the simple formula for average velocity is just V = (change in distance)/(change in time).
That is what you did for the 4.45 s: (1063-63)/(5.80-1.35)=225
but shouldn't it be (1000-63)/4.45 = 211 ?

Do the (b) part the same way using the 63 meters in time 1.35 s.
 
  • #6
elpermic said:
A)I did a and kept on getting 225. (1063-63)/(5.80-1.35)=225
Whether you gave us the full question is irrelevant. I can tell upon inspection that your answer is incorrect. Why? You answer is not an acceleration. Get into the habit of always being explicit about units. The cost in doing so is minimal: you have to write a few extra characters. The benefit is immense. You will know whether you answer makes sense from a units perspective. If you don't have the units right you don't have the right answer.

In this case,

[tex](1063\,\text{m}\,-63\,\text{m})/(5.80\,\text{s}\,-1.35\,\text{s}) = 225\,\text{m}/\text{s}[/tex]

You have just computed a speed, not an acceleration.BTW, that 1063 meters is also incorrect. The vehicle is 1 km above the ground after 5.80 seconds, not 1 km above the top of the launch platform.
 
  • #7
D H said:
You have just computed a speed, not an acceleration.

the question was to compute a speed
 
  • #8
You're right. I misread the question.
 

FAQ: Rocket Velocity Calculation for Different Time Intervals

What does "Am i wrong or the book?" mean?

The phrase "Am i wrong or the book?" is often used to express uncertainty about a statement or belief. It suggests that the person is questioning whether their understanding or interpretation is correct, or if the information they have read in a book is accurate.

Should I always trust what I read in a book?

No, you should not always trust what you read in a book. While books can be valuable sources of information, they are not infallible. It is important to critically evaluate the information presented in a book and consider the credibility of the author and the sources they used.

How can I determine if a book is accurate?

To determine the accuracy of a book, you can do some research on the author and their credentials, check for references or sources cited, and compare the information to other reputable sources. It is also important to consider any potential biases the author may have.

What should I do if I find conflicting information in different books?

If you find conflicting information in different books, it is important to do further research and gather information from a variety of sources. Consider the credibility and biases of each source and try to find additional evidence or perspectives to support or refute the information.

Can a book ever be considered "wrong"?

Yes, a book can be considered "wrong" if it presents inaccurate or biased information. It is important to critically evaluate the information presented in a book and not blindly accept everything that is written. Additionally, as new evidence and information is discovered, the information in a book may become outdated or incorrect.

Similar threads

Back
Top