Rod resting against a smooth peg

In summary, the normal force is created when the weight is removed from the surface of the horizontal surface.
  • #1
brotherbobby
702
163
1662551151275.png
Statement : Here is the statement from the text that I paste to the right. Diagram : Does anyone have a diagram (image) as to how does the situation look?

Normal Reaction : When a rod rests against a smooth wall, we know that the direction of the reaction is normal to the wall. I understand that the peg is a point, hence there is no meaning to the statement of the reaction force being "normal" to it. However, how is the reaction force normal to the rod? Is it also the case for a rope tied to the peg and through which a tension force exists?


Answers would be most welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
brotherbobby said:
View attachment 313871Statement : Here is the statement from the text that I paste to the right. Diagram : Does anyone have a diagram (image) as to how does the situation look?

Normal Reaction : When a rod rests against a smooth wall, we know that the direction of the reaction is normal to the wall. I understand that the peg is a point, hence there is no meaning to the statement of the reaction force being "normal" to it. However, how is the reaction force normal to the rod? Is it also the case for a rope tied to the peg and through which a tension force exists?


Answers would be most welcome.
I do not agree that a peg needs to be modeled as a point. Similarly, a rod need not be modeled as a line. In three dimensions, both can be modeled as cylinders. In two dimensions, the rod can be modeled as a long thin slab and the peg as a circle.

1662553335817.png


You ask about a force "normal" to a rod. That would be a force at right angles to the surface of the rod at the point of contact. If the peg is modeled as having a non-zero size, this will also be at right angles to the surface of the peg at the point of contact.

You also ask about a rope (wrapped around?) a peg. This time, the point of contact is spread around the peg. The "normal" force loses some of its meaning. Instead, we have the normal force over here, the normal force a bit further along and the normal force a bit further still. There are ways to calculate the net effect of all of those normal (and frictional) forces. It amounts to adding them all up using integrals, derivatives and a bit of trigonometry.

If the rope on peg is free of friction, the result is quite simple indeed. The assembly amounts to a pulley.

If the rope is tied to the peg, the result is again quite simple. The assembly amounts to a fixed attachment point.

If the rope on peg has friction, an exponential function results. [One solves a homogeneous linear first order differential equation. That is about the simplest sort of differential equation there is, so this example is sometimes used when teaching differential equations]. The maximum tension on the one side before the rope slips is given by a function along the lines of ##t_1 \leq t_2 e^{\mu\theta}## where ##\mu## is the coefficient of [static] friction and ##\theta## is the angle through which the rope wraps. It is easy to hold a rope taut against a huge counter-force if you can wrap it a couple of times around a tree first.

One can also think of the normal and frictional forces in relation to knots. A knot that holds is one in which tension from the load feeds back into tension in the knot sufficient to allow friction within the knot to resist the load. [If you wrap that rope a couple of times around the tree and then tuck your end under the first loop, you can walk away and not bother holding on]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and Steve4Physics
  • #3
In addition to what @jbriggs444 has said, can I add this.

Consider two objects (of any shape) with a single point of contact (P).

The objects’ surfaces have a common tangent at P. Their common normal at P is perpendicular to this common tangent.

Suppose one of the objects (say a rod, radius R) shrinks, keeping P fixed. The direction of the tangent (and hence the normal) at P are unchanged. This remains true as R→0 (when the rod is now a line, with a cross-section which is a point).
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and jbriggs444
  • #4
brotherbobby said:
However, how is the reaction force normal to the rod?
Can you visualize the rotating normal force that transfers movement from the peg to the slotted part?

http://507movements.com/mm_100.html
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes TSny and Steve4Physics
  • #5
  • Like
Likes TSny and Lnewqban
  • #6
Lnewqban said:
Can you visualize the rotating normal force that transfers movement from the peg to the slotted part?

http://507movements.com/mm_100.html
A peg in a tightly-fitting slot is no longer about the normal forces on either side of the peg. Those are statically indeterminate. If the slot is a tight fit, both normal forces increase. If it is a loose fit then one may decrease to zero or a gap may even open up.

Instead, a peg in a tightly-fitting but frictionless slot should be viewed in terms of the constraint that it places on the resulting motion. The sum of the two normal forces is the net force associated with the constraint.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #7

FAQ: Rod resting against a smooth peg

What is "rod resting against a smooth peg"?

"Rod resting against a smooth peg" refers to a simple physics problem where a rod of a certain length and weight is placed horizontally against a smooth vertical peg without slipping or falling.

What factors affect the stability of the rod resting against a smooth peg?

The stability of the rod resting against a smooth peg is affected by the length and weight of the rod, as well as the angle at which it is placed against the peg. The surface of the peg and the surface of the rod also play a role in its stability.

How can the stability of the rod resting against a smooth peg be increased?

The stability of the rod resting against a smooth peg can be increased by increasing the length of the rod, decreasing its weight, and placing it at a steeper angle against the peg. Using a peg with a rougher surface can also increase stability.

What is the purpose of studying the rod resting against a smooth peg?

Studying the rod resting against a smooth peg can help us understand the principles of equilibrium and stability in physics. It can also be useful in engineering and design to ensure the stability of structures and objects.

Can the rod resting against a smooth peg be used to demonstrate other physics concepts?

Yes, the rod resting against a smooth peg can be used to demonstrate concepts such as torque, center of mass, and friction. It can also be used to illustrate the difference between static and dynamic equilibrium.

Back
Top