Rotation of the stress tensor

  • #1
happyparticle
465
21
Homework Statement
Rotation of ##\pi /4## of the stress tensor around the Z-axis
Relevant Equations
$$D'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} D_{xx} - \frac{1}{2} D_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} \tau_{xx} -\frac{1}{2} \tau_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy} + C_{12}D_{zz}$$
First of all I have this system

$$\begin{pmatrix}\tau_{xx} \\ \tau_{yy} \\ \tau_{zz} \\ \tau_{xy} \\ \tau_{yz} \\ \tau_{zx} \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{12} & C_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}D_{xx} \\ D_{yy} \\ D_{zz} \\ D_{xy} \\ D_{yz} \\ D_{zx} \end{pmatrix}$$

Then I perform a rotation of ##\pi /4## around the z-axis.

For ##\tau_{xy}## I get

$$D'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} D_{xx} - \frac{1}{2} D_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} \tau_{xx} -\frac{1}{2} \tau_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}$$

Also,
$$\tau_{xy} = C_{44}D_{xy}$$

The answer I'm looking for is ##C_{11} = C_{44} + C_{12}##

I read that the ##C_{ij}## must be invariant. What does it means here ? Since there is no ##D_{xy}## term in the expression for ##\tau'_{xy}## , ##C_{44}## must be 0 and ##C_{12} = C_{11}##?

However, this is not the right answer. I'm not sure to understand.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
happyparticle said:
First of all I have this system

$$\begin{pmatrix}\tau_{xx} \\ \tau_{yy} \\ \tau_{zz} \\ \tau_{xy} \\ \tau_{yz} \\ \tau_{zx} \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{12} & C_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}D_{xx} \\ D_{yy} \\ D_{zz} \\ D_{xy} \\ D_{yz} \\ D_{zx} \end{pmatrix}$$
I assume the ##\tau_{ij}## are components of stress and the ##D_{ij}## are components of strain. Check to make sure that you have written this correctly. For example, look at equation (3.13) in these notes. Note carefully the indices in the last three entries of the stress column vector (##\sigma_{ij}##) and also in the strain column vector (##\epsilon_{ij}##). Also, note the factors of 2 in the last three entries of the ##\epsilon_{ij}## vector. Thus, in your notation for stress and strain, this would be

$$\begin{pmatrix}\tau_{xx} \\ \tau_{yy} \\ \tau_{zz} \\ \tau_{yz} \\ \tau_{zx} \\ \tau_{xy} \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}C_{11} & C_{12} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{11} & C_{12} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ C_{12} & C_{12} & C_{11} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & C_{44} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}D_{xx} \\ D_{yy} \\ D_{zz} \\ 2D_{yz} \\ 2D_{zx} \\ 2D_{xy} \end{pmatrix}$$
happyparticle said:
Then I perform a rotation of ##\pi /4## around the z-axis.

For ##\tau_{xy}## I get

$$D'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} D_{xx} - \frac{1}{2} D_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} \tau_{xx} -\frac{1}{2} \tau_{yy}$$
$$\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}$$
OK. I think this is correct.

happyparticle said:
Also,
$$\tau_{xy} = C_{44}D_{xy}$$

The answer I'm looking for is ##C_{11} = C_{44} + C_{12}##

I read that the ##C_{ij}## must be invariant. What does it means here ? Since there is no ##D_{xy}## term in the expression for ##\tau'_{xy}## , ##C_{44}## must be 0 and ##C_{12} = C_{11}##?

However, this is not the right answer. I'm not sure to understand.
In general, for any system, we see from (3.13) and (3.15) in the link above that $$\tau_{xy} = C_{61} D_{xx}+C_{62} D_{yy}+C_{63} D_{zz}+C_{64} (2D_{yz})+C_{65} (2D_{zx})+C_{66} (2D_{xy})$$ For your particular system before the rotation, all of the ##C_{6i} = 0## except ##C_{66}##. So, $$\tau_{xy} =2 C_{66} D_{xy}.$$ Since ##C_{66} = C_{44}## in your system before the rotation, you could write this as $$\tau_{xy} =2 C_{44} D_{xy}.$$ [Edited to fix a couple of typos in the indices]

After the rotation, we use a prime for the various quantities. So, after the rotation, we have $$\tau'_{xy} = C'_{61} D'_{xx}+C'_{62} D'_{yy}+C'_{63} D'_{zz}+C'_{64} (2D'_{yz})+C'_{65} (2D'_{zx})+C'_{66} (2D'_{xy})$$
The stiffness coefficients are not invariant. That is, we cannot assume ##C'_{ij} = C_{ij}##. You will need to work out the values of the ##C'_{6i}## for the system after the rotation. I think you will find that all of the ##C'_{6i} = 0## except for ##C'_{66}##. Show ##C'_{66} = \frac 1 2 (C_{11}- C_{12})##.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
TSny said:
You will need to work out the values of the C6i′ for the system after the rotation
I'm not sure what I have to compare. Is ##\tau_{xy}## is the same after rotation ? Hence, I can compare it with ##\tau'_{xy}##. I guess... It it not clear for me what I have to do. I see like 4 equations, but I don't see any relationship between them.

Edit:

I read the link you gave and I think I have to compare $$
\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}
$$ with
$$\tau'_{xy} = C'_{61} D'_{xx}+C'_{62} D'_{yy}+C'_{63} D'_{zz}+C'_{64} (D'_{yz})+C'_{65} (D'_{zx})+C'_{66} (D'_{xy}) $$

However, I'm not sure why exactly. Also it gaves me
##C'_{61} = \frac 1 2 (C_{11}- C_{12})## and ##C'_{62} = \frac 1 2 (-C_{11} + C_{12})##
 
Last edited:
  • #4
The components of the C matrix do not change as a result of a rotation of the coordinate system.
 
  • #5
happyparticle said:
I read the link you gave and I think I have to compare $$
\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}
$$ with
$$\tau'_{xy} = C'_{61} D'_{xx}+C'_{62} D'_{yy}+C'_{63} D'_{zz}+C'_{64} (D'_{yz})+C'_{65} (D'_{zx})+C'_{66} (D'_{xy}) $$
Yes, in your first post you wrote ##\tau'_{xy} = \frac 1 2 \tau_{xx} - \frac 1 2 \tau_{yy}##. This shows how the stress component ##\tau'_{xy}## after the rotation relates to the stress components before the rotation. From this equation you can get your result ##\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}##.

It appeared to me that in your first post, you were getting confused because you were considering the stiffnesses ##C_{ij}## as invariant under rotations. But, for an anisotropic medium, the ##C_{ij}## are not generally invariant. For example, ##C'_{66} \neq C_{66}## in the medium you are considering. Instead, ##C'_{66} = \frac 1 2 (C_{11} - C_{12})##. Using this result for ##C'_{66}## along with the results ##C'_{6i} = 0## for ##i = 1, 2, 3, 4##, and ##5##, you can show that the equation $$\tau'_{xy} = C'_{61} D'_{xx}+C'_{62} D'_{yy}+C'_{63} D'_{zz}+C'_{64} (2D'_{yz})+C'_{65} (2D'_{zx})+C'_{66} (2D'_{xy}) $$ agrees with your result ##\tau'_{xy} = \frac{1}{2} (C_{11} - C_{12})D_{xx} + \frac{1}{2} (C_{12} - C_{11}) D_{yy}##.

But, maybe I misinterpreted your source of confusion in the first post.


happyparticle said:
Also it gaves me
##C'_{61} = \frac 1 2 (C_{11}- C_{12})## and ##C'_{62} = \frac 1 2 (-C_{11} + C_{12})##
You should find ##C'_{61} = C'_{62} = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes happyparticle
  • #6
Chestermiller said:
The components of the C matrix do not change as a result of a rotation of the coordinate system.
That's true for an isotropic material. However, in an anisotropic material, the components generally are not invariant under a coordinate rotation.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
  • #7
All right, I think I understand. Also, for an isotropic material after the rotation are the ##C_{ij}## not primed ? For instance, ##\tau'_{ij} = C_{ij}D'{ij}## ?
 
  • #8
happyparticle said:
All right, I think I understand. Also, for an isotropic material after the rotation are the ##C_{ij}## not primed ? For instance, ##\tau'_{ij} = C_{ij}D'{ij}## ?
Yes. For example, in an isotropic medium, ##\tau_{xx} = C_{11} D_{xx} + C_{12}(D_{yy} + D_{zz})##. After a rotation, none of the ##C## matrix elements change for the isotropic medium. So, you could write ##\tau'_{xx} = C'_{11} D'_{xx} + C'_{12}(D'_{yy} + D'_{zz}) = C_{11} D'_{xx} + C_{12}(D'_{yy} + D'_{zz})##.
 
  • Like
Likes happyparticle
  • #9
All right, Thank you!

I was really confused.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny

FAQ: Rotation of the stress tensor

What is the stress tensor?

The stress tensor is a mathematical representation that describes the internal forces within a material. It characterizes how stress is distributed in a solid body under external loads and is typically represented as a second-order tensor, which contains normal and shear stress components acting on different planes within the material.

Why is the rotation of the stress tensor important?

The rotation of the stress tensor is important because it allows for the analysis of stress states in different coordinate systems. Understanding how the stress tensor transforms under rotation is crucial for engineering applications, such as in the design of structures and materials, as it helps predict failure modes and material behavior under various loading conditions.

How is the rotation of the stress tensor mathematically expressed?

The rotation of the stress tensor is mathematically expressed using a transformation matrix derived from the rotation angles. If σ is the original stress tensor and R is the rotation matrix, the transformed stress tensor σ' in the new coordinate system can be calculated using the formula: σ' = R σ R^T, where R^T is the transpose of the rotation matrix.

What are the physical implications of rotating the stress tensor?

The physical implications of rotating the stress tensor include the ability to analyze how the distribution of stress changes when the coordinate system is altered. This is particularly useful in understanding how materials respond to different loading conditions, identifying principal stresses, and determining failure criteria in various orientations.

Can the rotation of the stress tensor affect material failure?

Yes, the rotation of the stress tensor can significantly affect material failure. Different orientations of the stress tensor can lead to variations in the principal stresses experienced by the material, which can influence the likelihood of yielding or fracture. Understanding these effects is essential for predicting failure in structural components subjected to complex loading scenarios.

Similar threads

Back
Top