Rotational kinetic energy of falling mass

Click For Summary
Engineers are working on a system where a falling mass transfers kinetic energy to a rotating drum, starting from rest and with negligible friction. The conservation of energy equation mgh = rotational + translational kinetic energy is central to solving the problem. The discussion highlights the need to relate the descending mass's velocity to the drum's rotational velocity, emphasizing that the gravitational constant differs between Earth and Mars. A participant initially miscalculated the height on Mars, not accounting for both rotational and linear kinetic energy. The correct approach involves recognizing that potential energy equals the sum of both kinetic forms, leading to a larger height on Mars compared to Earth.
kyin01
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1-14.png

Engineers are designing a system by which a falling mass {m} imparts kinetic energy to a rotating uniform drum to which it is attached by thin, very light wire wrapped around the rim of the drum ( View Figure ). There is no appreciable friction in the axle of the drum, and everything starts from rest.

That is top part of the problem


Homework Equations


mgh = rotational + translation kinetic energy


The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried various methods mainly using energy conservation laws, but I can't get it right. the problem didn't give I or R so I've been using .200J as the total rotational energy.

Any hits on how I should be going on this problem?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The presentation of your problem is headache inducing. Can you maybe just include the diagram, and the problem statement and leave off the irrelevant blank graphic parts. Just type out what the question is. You also left out any description of how you attempted to use those conservation laws. There is a relation between the velocity of the descending weight and the rotational velocity of the disk. v=omega*r. Did you use that? No way to know, is there?
 
Last edited:
that was all that's given in the problem. The question is under Part A.
 
You don't need I or R. The question is to compare the operation of the thing on Earth and on Mars. The only difference is 'g'. If you don't know something leave it as a letter. Now, write down one of these conservation laws.
 
In this situation there are no non conservative forces so

Kinetic energy = potential energy.

So in our situation we have
(Point 1 to be taken at before the system is released and point 2 to be taken just before it hits the ground)

mgh= .200 (which is the rotational kinetic energy that was given to us)

so in mars, just replace 9.8 with the given 3.71 (mass is the same) and solve for h. But when I tried that, they told me it's wrong.
I got h to be .003594m
 
Absolutely right. But how did you get that silly answer? If m*(9.8m/s^2)*h_earth=m*(3.7m/s^2)*h_mars, then h_mars must be LARGER than h_earth. Can you post the details of how you did it?
 
ah, I got it. Forgot to take account linear kinetic energy also

so the system is actually

Potential energy = Kinetic rotational + kinetic linear

thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K