- #36
zomgwtf
- 66
- 2
Hurkyl said:Adapting to padded heels is just as "unnatural" as adapting to sharp rocks. It's obvious how you plan on getting rid of the first effect -- how do you plan on getting rid of the second one? After all, I suspect you'll reject the obvious way...
(Also, if we were really serious, we would need to find some way to deal with the possibility that people would learn a certain gait by watching others)
(Why do we care what's "natural"? )
The problem is that if you didn't wear shoes you wouldn't be 'adapting' to anything. You would run with your forefoot hitting first. That is how we have evolved over all these years.
Your arguements are starting to get rediculous now it appears you're trying to claim that what occurs naturally without technological interference is really unnatural because there's the possibility that we would have to learn this behaviour? Then what DOES it mean for something to be 'natural' for humans? As well it really has nothing to do with sharp rocks. If you just want to be difficult and continue to believe that because you've grown up with shoes and walk/run a certain way then by all means believe that. When you see humans who are removed from these types of 'privleges' and you notice that they run differently than yourself maybe you'll think why? Maybe you'll also think why they can run for hours whereas you can only run for minutes? Maybe you'll do some research into the topic instead of running around with a biased opinion?
As well we care what's the natural running gait because it was brought up that a humans normal gait is heal impacting first. That's right but not what occurs in a running or sprinting gait. It relates to the OP because they are discussing how because of shoes we have the tendency to lose our natural running gait towards a more 'heal impact' gait which will result in higher potential for injury and is very inefficient. Regardless of if you are wearing shoes or not.