Running shoes considered harmful?

  • Thread starter JaWiB
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Running
In summary, the article discusses a study that suggests that barefoot running is better for your feet than wearing shoes. The study showed that barefoot runners generate smaller collision forces than shod rear-foot strikers. This may be because barefoot runners strike the ground with their middle/fore foot instead of the heal, which is different from the normal gait that we are used to. While this study was conducted in Africa, the author argues that the same principles apply to running in the US. He suggests that people learn how to run properly by doing it naturally, rather than following the incorrect method that is taught in running classes.
  • #36
Hurkyl said:
Adapting to padded heels is just as "unnatural" as adapting to sharp rocks. It's obvious how you plan on getting rid of the first effect -- how do you plan on getting rid of the second one? After all, I suspect you'll reject the obvious way...

(Also, if we were really serious, we would need to find some way to deal with the possibility that people would learn a certain gait by watching others)

(Why do we care what's "natural"? :confused:)

The problem is that if you didn't wear shoes you wouldn't be 'adapting' to anything. You would run with your forefoot hitting first. That is how we have evolved over all these years.

Your arguements are starting to get rediculous now it appears you're trying to claim that what occurs naturally without technological interference is really unnatural because there's the possibility that we would have to learn this behaviour? Then what DOES it mean for something to be 'natural' for humans? As well it really has nothing to do with sharp rocks. If you just want to be difficult and continue to believe that because you've grown up with shoes and walk/run a certain way then by all means believe that. When you see humans who are removed from these types of 'privleges' and you notice that they run differently than yourself maybe you'll think why? Maybe you'll also think why they can run for hours whereas you can only run for minutes? Maybe you'll do some research into the topic instead of running around with a biased opinion?

As well we care what's the natural running gait because it was brought up that a humans normal gait is heal impacting first. That's right but not what occurs in a running or sprinting gait. It relates to the OP because they are discussing how because of shoes we have the tendency to lose our natural running gait towards a more 'heal impact' gait which will result in higher potential for injury and is very inefficient. Regardless of if you are wearing shoes or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
It's been known for a long time that expensive running shoes which provide a lot of ankle support increase the risk of injury because they prevent you from developing strong ankle muscles.

The lack of a sole also strengthens the muscles on the bottom of your foot, which is a good reason to run barefoot on the beach.

However if you're running around in rocky or urban terrain, it's still a good idea to wear some kind of shoe...simply to protect yourself from small rocks and things. I think this is pretty obvious. The point is that you don't need to go out and buy those expensive shoes with all kinds of "supportive technology" built into them...nor do you need to replace your shoes every few months as the shoe companies would like to suggest.

Another thing to keep in mind is that it's very unnatural to walk and run on pavement all the time. If you choose to run on pavement, don't be surprised when you develop knee and hip problems later in life. It's better to run on dirt trails or off to the side of the road because the Earth will provide a little bit of natural cushioning.

Also check out
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0060199210/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Back
Top