MHB ?'s question at Yahoo Answers regarding Laplace Transforms

AI Thread Summary
To find the Laplace Transform of f(t) = sin(3t)cos(3t), the trigonometric identity sin(2θ) = 2sin(θ)cos(θ) is applied, resulting in f(t) being rewritten as (1/2)sin(6t). Using the known Laplace Transform of sin(kt), the transform of (1/2)sin(6t) is calculated as (3/(s^2 + 36)). The discussion also includes a derivation of the Laplace Transform from first principles, confirming the final result. The steps provided clarify the process for computing the Laplace Transform effectively.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here is the question.

Can you show the steps of this differential equations problem? said:
Find laplace {f(t)} by first using a trigonometric identity. (Write your answer as a function of s.)f(t)= sin(3t)cos(3t)the final answer is:
3/(s^(2)+36)

Here is a link to the question:

Can you show the steps of this differential equations problem? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello ?,

We first use the trig identity $\sin(2\theta)=2\sin\theta\cos\theta$ to rewrite $\sin(3t)\cos(3t)$; in particular, we have that $\sin(3t)\cos(3t)=\frac{1}{2}\sin(2\cdot(3t)) =\frac{1}{2}\sin(6t)$.

Now, I'm not sure exactly what formulas you can use, but if you can use certain formulas for Laplace Transforms, then you're done since we know $\mathcal{L}\left\{\frac{1}{2}\sin(6t)\right\} =\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{L}\{\sin(6t)\} =\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{6}{s^2+6^2} =\dfrac{3}{s^2+36}$.

Otherwise, we need to compute the Laplace Transform by first principles; to make this easier for us, let us first compute $\mathcal{L}\{e^{at}\}$ where $a\in\mathbb{R}$.

\[\begin{aligned}\mathcal{L}\{e^{at}\} &= \int_0^{\infty}e^{-st}e^{at}\,dt\\ &= \int_0^{\infty}e^{-(s-a)t}\,dt\\ &= \lim_{b\to\infty} \left.\left[-\frac{e^{-(s-a)t}}{s-a}\right]\right|_{0}^{b}\\ &= \lim_{b\to\infty} -\frac{e^{-(s-a)b}}{s-a} + \frac{1}{s-a}\end{aligned}\]
Note that $\displaystyle\lim_{b\to\infty}-\frac{e^{-(s-a)b}}{s-a}=0$ if $s>a$. Thus, we have that $\mathcal{L}\{e^{at}\}=\dfrac{1}{s-a}$ for $s>a$.

Now, how does this help us with computing $\mathcal{L}\{\sin(6t)\}$? Well, we know from complex variables that $\sin(kx)=\dfrac{e^{ikx}-e^{-ikx}}{2i}$, so it follows that
\[\begin{aligned}\mathcal{L}\{\sin(6t)\} &= \frac{1}{2i}\left[\mathcal{L}\left\{e^{6it}\right\} - \mathcal{L}\left\{e^{-6it}\right\}\right] \\ &= \frac{1}{2i}\left[\frac{1}{s-6i} - \frac{1}{s+6i}\right]\\ &= \frac{1}{2i}\left[\frac{12i}{s^2-(6i)^2}\right] \\ &= \frac{6}{s^2+36}\end{aligned}\]
And thus $\mathcal{L}\{\sin(3t)\cos(3t)\} =\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{L}\{\sin(6t)\}=\dfrac{3}{s^2+36}$.

I hope this makes sense!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top