S=u*t+a*t^2/2 VS ratio 1:2:3:5... t1/t10= ...

In summary, the equation \( S = ut + \frac{at^2}{2} \) describes the relationship between displacement (S), initial velocity (u), acceleration (a), and time (t) in kinematics. The ratio 1:2:3:5 suggests a proportional relationship among different time intervals (t1, t2, t3, t4, etc.), which can be analyzed to understand how displacement changes over these intervals, possibly leading to a calculation of ratios like \( \frac{t1}{t10} \) based on the defined sequence.
  • #1
Steels
4
0
Homework Statement
Galileo Ratio? But why squeroot? what am i missing?
Relevant Equations
s=u*t+a*t^2/2 VS 1:2:3:... t1/t10=s1/s10?
Hello! I can do this task just using this formula s=u*t+a*t^2/2.
But just saw an example where someone used this Galileo toerem.
Here is task:
"An observer stands on the platform at the front edge of the first bogie of a stationary train. The train starts moving with uniform acceleration and the first bogie takes 5 seconds to cross the observer. If all the bogies of the train are of equal length and the gap between them is negligible, the time taken by the tength bogie to cross observer is?"
Now please, if you look at picture, you see its t1/t10=1/(sqrt(10)-sqrt(9))My question is, why its in squeroot? Where do we get x^2? so to get squeroot we need x^2! but from what? Why the lenght, it its meter it should be as meter, so where we get m^2? What am i doing wrong. Thanks for any explenation!
galileo.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hllo @Steels ,
:welcome: ##\qquad ## !​

You have $$ s = {1\over 2}at^2$$so$$t = \sqrt{s\over 2a}$$and you are given that ##t_1 = 5## sec is the time for the first car to pass the observer.

If a car has length ##l##, you know that ##\sqrt{l\over 2a}= 5## sec.

And the exercise asks for ##\sqrt{10 {l\over 2a}} - \sqrt{9 {l\over 2a}} = \left (\sqrt{10 } - \sqrt{9} \right ) {l\over 2a} ## which, as you can see has the dimension of time.

The 10 and the 9 are numbers, no dimension.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and topsquark
  • #3
BvU said:
If a car has length ##l##, you know that ##\sqrt{l\over 2a}= 5## sec.
Ahem, $$L=\dfrac{1}{2}at^2 \implies t^2=\dfrac{2L}{a} \implies t=\sqrt{\dfrac{2L}{a} }.$$ Also ##\sqrt{\frac{L}{a}}## has dimensions of time.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR
  • #4
Oops, thank you ! o:)
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman
  • #5
Steels said:
... the time taken by the tength bogie to cross observer is?
Ten (or more) bogies? That’s a bogie wonderland! (If puzzled, give yourself a treat and click here.)

By the way - 'tenth' not 'tength'!
 
  • #6
Muchas love for explanation! How could i miss that.
Thank you all for replys! Have a nice day to you all!
 
  • #7
Hold it ! Had no idea what a bogie is; turns out the tenth bogie may well be at he end of the fifth railway car, not the tenth ! Unless we are talking Indian English ...

Google said:
The term "car" is commonly used by itself in American English when a rail context is implicit. Indian English sometimes uses "bogie" in the same manner,[1]
(but then, who trusts google...)

The exercise becomes pretty impossible if bogie ##\ne## railcar ... :rolleyes:

##\ ##
 
  • #8
BvU said:
Hold it ! Had no idea what a bogie is; turns out the tenth bogie may well be at he end of the fifth railway car, not the tenth ! Unless we are talking Indian English ...

(but then, who trusts google...)

The exercise becomes pretty impossible if bogie ##\ne## railcar ... :rolleyes:

##\ ##
No, it's a rail wagon= railcar. bogie is meant the same as wagon.
 
  • #9
Ok, a bogie is a railcar -- keeps things manageable :smile: . But let's try to use English English for our communication ... wagon it is.

In response to a private conversation:

Steels said:
... i tried that later and i failed! ..
1st IMG _0370 picture, i got same result with just using physics method.

But in 2nd IMG_0371picture is what you sent me this morning! That mathematic ratio stuff.
And i am wondering about that part, where does that go!
Please, take a look at pictures, especially at 0371. what am i doing wrong by doing all that algebra stuff? Maybe wrong shortening?

IMG_0370:
1697812089298.png


IMG_0371:
?hash=b0e5ba1f73dafa9a00fd908056e4f98e.png

##\ ##

We want to do this in the actual thread, not in private conversation: that way, others can correct any mistakes (which has already occurred at least once !)​
Also, we should type our equations using ##\LaTeX## for legibility​

Re IMG_0371:
The exercise asks for
Steels said:
the time taken by the tength bogie to cross observer
So that is
the time from ##t=0## until the tenth wagon has passed the observer (let's call this ##t_{10}##)​
minus
the time from ##t=0## until the ninth wagon has passed the observer (let's call this ##t_{9}##)​

(Note that ##t_{10}## is defined differently here: with these definitions, the answer to the exercise is ##t_{10}-t_9## !)

And we were given
the time from ##t=0## until the first wagon has passed the observer (let's call this ##t_{1}##, 5 seconds)​

Let me correct my mistake(s) in #2
BvU said:
If a car has length ##l,## you know that ##\sqrt{l\over 2a}= 5## sec.
(using lower case ##l## was one, ##l\over 2a## instead of ##2l\over a## the other :rolleyes: and kuruman caught both !)

If one wagon has length ##L##, we can write$$
\begin{align*} t_1 &= \sqrt{\dfrac{2}{a} \,L} \\ t_{10} &= \sqrt{\dfrac{2}{a} \,10 L} \\ t_9 &= \sqrt{\dfrac{2}{a} \,9L} \end{align*}
$$so that our exercise answer becomes $$
\begin{align*} t_{10}-t_9 &=\sqrt{\dfrac{2}{a} \,10 L} \ - \sqrt{\dfrac{2}{a} \,9 L} \\
&=\sqrt{\dfrac{2}{a} \, L}\ \sqrt {10\;\vphantom{\dfrac{1}{1}}} \ - \sqrt{\dfrac{2}{a} \, L} \ \sqrt {9\;\vphantom{\dfrac{1}{1}}} \\
&= \sqrt{\dfrac{2}{a} \, L} \ \left (\sqrt {10\;} - \sqrt {9\;} \right ) \\
&=t_1 \left (\sqrt {10} - \sqrt 9 \right ) \end{align*} $$

Does this clarify things a little ?

##\ ##
 

Attachments

  • 1697812503300.png
    1697812503300.png
    51 KB · Views: 73
  • Like
Likes SammyS and Steels

FAQ: S=u*t+a*t^2/2 VS ratio 1:2:3:5... t1/t10= ...

What does the equation S = u*t + (1/2)*a*t^2 represent?

This equation represents the displacement (S) of an object in uniformly accelerated motion. Here, 'u' is the initial velocity, 't' is the time, and 'a' is the constant acceleration. The term u*t accounts for the displacement due to the initial velocity, while (1/2)*a*t^2 accounts for the additional displacement due to acceleration.

What is the significance of the ratio 1:2:3:5 in physics?

The ratio 1:2:3:5 often appears in problems involving sequences or series, particularly in the context of harmonic or Fibonacci-like sequences. It is not directly related to the kinematic equation S = u*t + (1/2)*a*t^2 but may appear in problems dealing with proportional relationships or patterns in physical systems.

How do you find the ratio t1/t10?

To find the ratio t1/t10, you need to have specific information about the times t1 and t10 under the same conditions or constraints. If these times refer to particular events or intervals in a uniformly accelerated motion, you would use the kinematic equations to solve for t1 and t10 and then take their ratio. Without additional context, the exact method to find this ratio cannot be determined.

How can the equation S = u*t + (1/2)*a*t^2 be applied in real-life scenarios?

This equation is widely used in various real-life scenarios involving uniformly accelerated motion, such as calculating the distance traveled by a car under constant acceleration, the height reached by a projectile, or the motion of objects in free fall. It helps predict future positions and analyze the motion of objects under constant acceleration.

Can the ratio 1:2:3:5 be derived from the kinematic equation S = u*t + (1/2)*a*t^2?

No, the ratio 1:2:3:5 cannot be directly derived from the kinematic equation S = u*t + (1/2)*a*t^2. The kinematic equation deals with the relationship between displacement, initial velocity, time, and acceleration. The ratio 1:2:3:5 is more likely to be relevant in contexts involving sequences or series rather than direct kinematic analysis.

Back
Top