Safe High Voltage Source?

  • #1
bob012345
Gold Member
2,089
915
I need a relatively high voltage less than 10k but essentially zero current on the order of 0.1 micro amps and very low power due to leakage on the order of 200 micro watts. These are rough numbers. My question is can I boost a 9V battery to provide the voltage and will it still be dangerous if the current and power as limited to those max ranges? The application is testing a capacitor. The actual target numbers are around 3500V, 0.06 micro amps and 200micro watts .

Is there a fundamentally safe way to do this? Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is the capacitance value of the capacitor?
 
  • #3
It's a parallel plate capacitor about 0.01 square meters and a separation of about 1cm and dielectric is air so about 5 pF is my guess.
 
  • #4
bob012345 said:
Is there a fundamentally safe way to do this? Thanks.
Are you happy with a pulse as opposed to steady flow? If so a coil and something to break the circuit - think breaker points on an old pre-electronic auto ignition - will do the trick. You will definitely notice the shock if the voltage goes astray and it will be unpleasant enough to discourage repetition, but about as safe as these voltages can be.
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345
  • #5
It will take 0.25 seconds, to charge 5pF, to 5kV, with an 0.1uA current source.

bob012345 said:
Is there a fundamentally safe way to do this? Thanks.
No.
5kV is fundamentally unsafe, without discipline and safe procedures.

You might build a Cockcroft–Walton voltage multiplier using low value capacitors to limit the current.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cockcroft–Walton_generator#Operation

You would need to drive the multiplier with a 250 Vpp high-voltage oscillator at about 1 kHz, powered by the 9V battery.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and bob012345
  • #6
Nugatory said:
Are you happy with a pulse as opposed to steady flow? If so a coil and something to break the circuit - think breaker points on an old pre-electronic auto ignition - will do the trick. You will definitely notice the shock if the voltage goes astray and it will be unpleasant enough to discourage repetition, but about as safe as these voltages can be.
I need to keep the voltage constant for a long time (several minutes).
 
  • #7
Baluncore said:
It will take 0.25 seconds, to charge 5pF, to 5kV, with an 0.1uA current source.


No.
5kV is fundamentally unsafe, without discipline and safe procedures.

You might build a Cockcroft–Walton voltage multiplier using low value capacitors to limit the current.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cockcroft–Walton_generator#Operation

You would need to drive the multiplier with a 250 Vpp high-voltage oscillator at about 1 kHz, powered by the 9V battery.
Not sure I understand. Does this mean I need two voltage sources?
 
  • #8
Rub a balloon on your head? Just a guess. Have no idea what voltage it produces.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #9
OmCheeto said:
Rub a balloon on your head? Just a guess. Have no idea what voltage it produces.
Probably not enough to get through my thick skull.
 
  • #10
bob012345 said:
Not sure I understand. Does this mean I need two voltage sources?
Your 9V battery runs an AC oscillator like used in a xenon photo flash tube.
The CW multiplies that AC and produces the EHT DC output voltage.
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345
  • #11
Baluncore said:
Your 9V battery runs an AC oscillator like used in a xenon photo flash tube.
The CW multiplies that AC and produces the EHT DC output voltage.
Ok, thanks. I'll look it up and run it in LTSpice. Thanks again.
 
  • #12
I'm voting no, not safe. Mostly because you have to ask (which is great BTW).

Working with dangerous circuits is often presented as a circuit question, but it's usually way more complicated that what you intend. There are a lot of secondary considerations that can be hard to control or define. It's more about worst case conditions, failure modes and effects, and most of all, safe working practices.

One of the scariest things I ever did was to measure the impedance of a 1KW fast flow CO2 gas laser, while it was operating, with a frequency response analyzer. This laser had a 10KV, 10KW linear DC power supply. I literally spent a day at my desk, and just looking at the laser construction, thinking about how to do this thing safely and what to do if things go wrong. Then I spent about another day building special purpose test gear to make connections, limit voltages in fault conditions, emergency kill switches, plexiglass barriers, etc. Then the test took about 1 hour, but I was scared for about 2 days in total. The opposite of "hold my beer"; fear is maybe the most important safety tool.

BTW, the impedance of ionized gasses is a really interesting thing, I wish I had those old lab notebooks. But alas, I couldn't finish that work for business reasons, the project was killed.

Also, (off topic) funny story. The product was called "EVERLASE", it was pretty awful; very unreliable. One time my boss had to go to a customer site that had had several failures. They had painted an "N" in front of the name on the side and called it the "NEVERLASE"... ouch, they were kind of right.
coherent_everlase-arrow_569697.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and bob012345
  • #13
DaveE said:
I'm voting no, not safe. Mostly because you have to ask (which is great BTW).
Powered by a 9V battery.
A 1W single transistor oscillator.
Current limited by a CW multiplier.

For $20, eBay will sell you a "DC-12V High-Voltage Electrostatic Generator Negative Ion Generator" that produces 4.3 kV DC output.
Or, for $15, "DC 12V High Output DIY Air Ionizer Airborne Negative Ion Generator" that will produce 5 kV.
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345
  • #14
The thing is, how does one go from not an expert to a competent researcher wrt high voltage? Everything I want to try requires something dangerous and I am a very cautious person by nature. Where I experiment has safety people and HV experts so everything I do will be under some kind of supervision with lots of advice and input. I agree there is no completely safe option using HV but I just thought using 9V battery source might be a bit safer that a 3kV plug in power source. Thanks for the advice!
 
  • #15
bob012345 said:
The thing is, how does one go from not an expert to a competent researcher wrt high voltage? Everything I want to try requires something dangerous and I am a very cautious person by nature. Where I experiment has safety people and HV experts so everything I do will be under some kind of supervision with lots of advice and input. I agree there is no completely safe option using HV but I just thought using 9V battery source might be a bit safer that a 3kV plug in power source. Thanks for the advice!
If you are cautious and thoughtful, have enough experience in EE to understand the risks, and have access to people that you trust to ask about this stuff, then I think you'll be OK. You are absolutely on the right track asking these questions, most people don't. It's not the HV PS that kills you, it's what you do with it.

Most of these sort of questions are similar to "Should I buy my teenage boy a (real) bow and arrow set?"* It's not just the bow and arrow that we need to know about. So my generic answer is usually no, unless you provide the other ancillary information.

* or, here in the US, an AR-15.
 
  • #16
Baluncore said:
Powered by a 9V battery.
A 1W single transistor oscillator.
Current limited by a CW multiplier.

For $20, eBay will sell you a "DC-12V High-Voltage Electrostatic Generator Negative Ion Generator" that produces 4.3 kV DC output.
Or, for $15, "DC 12V High Output DIY Air Ionizer Airborne Negative Ion Generator" that will produce 5 kV.
Yes, it can be made or bought and be safe. But this is in a development lab. It's not necessarily the final product specs that I worry about. It's what EEs tend to do while they are working on the prototypes that's the concern.

People always ask, I'm going to build this thing, will it be safe? Perhaps my answer should be probably, if you don't kill yourself doing it.

I will also confess that as a pro EE for decades, I'm suspicious of tinkerer's that are attracted to HV like bugs to a porch light (not necessarily this OP). Why do you need HV? Why not learn about cool stuff at 5V, or 50V? The pros use HV because we have to, and most wish they didn't, it's a PITA. Again, a bias towards stay away, unless you provide further info.
 
  • #17
bob012345 said:
The application is testing a capacitor.
What kind of test?

bob012345 said:
It's a parallel plate capacitor about 0.01 square meters and a separation of about 1cm and dielectric is air so about 5 pF is my guess.
8.85pF is air dielectric. What is the dielectric? What is the tolerance of that separation number?

How are you going to monitor that 3500Vdc value that is applied to the capacitor? What is the input impedance of your measuring circuit (and hence the leakage current that you need to support)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top