Saturable Reactors: Power Control with Permanent Magnets

  • Thread starter Jdo300
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discussed the use of magnetic amplifiers to control the power level of an AC signal by varying the saturation level of the core. It was mentioned that this can be achieved through a transformer where the control coil is pulsed with DC. The question was raised about the effects of using a non-magnetic core with a permanent magnet placed in close proximity to the AC coil. It was clarified that saturating the core of a transformer actually reduces the transfer of energy from primary to secondary, and holding a magnet up to a transformer can greatly diminish its functionality.
  • #1
Jdo300
554
5
Hello,

I've been doing some research into antiquated Magnetic amplifiers. From what I understand, one can use a mag amp to control the power of an AC field by varying the saturation level of whatever core the AC coil is wrapped around (basically). I know that this can be accomplished by using a type of transformer where the control coil is pulsed with DC at varying levels to control the AC coil.

My question is that if it is the magnetic field that controls the power level of the AC signal, and the more saturated the core, the more power can get through. What would that same AC coil do if you wrapped it on a non magnetic core and exposed it to a magnetic field from a permanent magnet placed in close proximity to the coil?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not familiar with mag amps per se, but when you saturate the core of a transformer, you reduce the transfer of energy from primary to secondary, not increase it. Look at the B-H curve for magnetic material...As you get into saturation, the B does not increase in proportion to H anymore. It increases more slowly. That will reduce the flux linking to the secondary coil, compared to what you would get if the material were not saturating.

If you hold a magnet up to a transformer, the transformer does not work well at all.
 
  • #3


Hi,

Thank you for sharing your research on Magnetic amplifiers and their use in power control. You are correct in your understanding that a magnetic amplifier can be used to control the power of an AC field by varying the saturation level of the core. This is achieved by using a control coil that is pulsed with DC to control the saturation level.

To answer your question, if the AC coil is wrapped on a non-magnetic core and exposed to a magnetic field from a permanent magnet, it would not have the same effect as using a magnetic core. This is because the non-magnetic core does not have the ability to be saturated by the magnetic field, therefore it cannot control the power of the AC signal. The magnetic field from the permanent magnet would simply pass through the non-magnetic core and have no effect on the AC signal.

In summary, the use of a magnetic core is necessary for the magnetic amplifier to control the power of the AC signal. Without a magnetic core, the AC coil would not be able to control the power, even when exposed to a magnetic field from a permanent magnet. I hope this helps clarify your question.
 

FAQ: Saturable Reactors: Power Control with Permanent Magnets

What are saturable reactors?

Saturable reactors are electrical devices that use permanent magnets to control the power output of a system. They are typically used in power systems to regulate voltage or current levels.

How do saturable reactors work?

Saturable reactors work by using the magnetic properties of permanent magnets to control the flow of electricity. When the magnets are saturated, they allow a higher amount of current to flow through the system. When the magnets are unsaturated, they restrict the flow of current.

What are the advantages of using saturable reactors for power control?

One advantage of using saturable reactors is their ability to provide smooth and precise control over the power output of a system. They also have a simple design and are relatively easy to use and maintain. Another advantage is their ability to operate at high power levels without significant losses.

Are there any drawbacks to using saturable reactors?

One potential drawback of using saturable reactors is their sensitivity to temperature changes. This can affect their performance and may require additional cooling systems to be implemented. They also have limited power handling capabilities compared to other power control devices.

How are saturable reactors different from other power control devices?

Saturable reactors differ from other power control devices in that they use permanent magnets instead of electronic components to regulate power. This makes them more durable and reliable in harsh environments. They also have a lower cost compared to other power control devices.

Similar threads

Back
Top