MHB Scalar Triple Product and Coplanarity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the scalar triple product and its relation to coplanarity. It emphasizes the importance of understanding cross and dot products, providing a specific example with vectors v and w. The cross product is calculated using a determinant, resulting in the vector 5i - j - 7k. The next step involves taking the dot product of this result with another vector u. Understanding these operations is crucial for solving problems related to vector coplanarity.
brinlin
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Pre6.PNG
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forum. Before we go into the discussion of your particular question, please read the https://mathhelpboards.com/help/forum_rules/, especially "Show the nature of your question in your thread title" and "Show some effort". In this case, you should probably explain what exactly is not clear to you.
 
Do you not know how to do a cross product and a dot product?

With v= <2, 3, 1> and w= <3, 1, 2> the cross product, v x w, can be calculated as the determinant
$\left|\begin{array}{ccc}\vec{i} & \vec{j} & \vec{k} \\ 2 & 3 & 1 \\ 3 & 1 & 2 \end{array}\right|= \vec{i}\left|\begin{array}{cc}3 & 1 \\ 1 & 2\end{array}\right|- \vec{j}\left|\begin{array}{cc}2 & 1 \\ 3 & 2\end{array}\right|+ \vec{k}\left|\begin{array}{cc} 2 & 3 \\ 3 & 1 \end{array}\right|$
$= (6- 1)\vec{i}- (4- 3)\vec{j}+ (2- 9)\vec{k}= 5\vec{i}- \vec{j}- 7\vec{k}$

Now take the dot product of that with $u= \vec{i}+ 2\vec{j}+ 3\vec{k}$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top