Schrodinger equation molecules

In summary: However, no such wave-function is provided. Assuming the 2nd one is 82/18, they would, I believe, correspond to do different solutions. Those two solutions are not energetically equivalent so why would they show identical properties?
  • #36
Big-Daddy said:
Sorry, I noticed my answer isn't dimensionally sound. How about this one:

[tex]- \sum^M_{A=1} ({\frac{h^2}{2 \cdot m_A} \cdot \nabla_A^2})[/tex]

I will look into certain books which show some development of more quantum ideas.
Close, it should be hbar but otherwise, so long as M is the number of particles in the system, that is fine.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Thanks. And is energy (when we solve for it) a function of the position, or a numerical value for the system as a whole?
 
  • #38
Big-Daddy said:
Thanks. And is energy (when we solve for it) a function of the position, or a numerical value for the system as a whole?
It's the latter.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
143
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top