- #36
Ambitwistor
- 927
- 1
Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
Humm, yes I had figured that they would using the "known" manner of that, but is it possible that they 'miss evidence' because they believe that that part is figured out, but (perhaps) is actually flawed, inasmuch as, it isn't being accounted for in the manner in which it is "actually operating" as opposed to the way it has been believed to operate, which is how it is accounted for now, possible?
That was a remarkably incoherent sentence. Are you suggesting that there are gravitational effects on the signal beyond what general relativity predicts? If so, that's possible: the whole point of their paper is that they have an anomalous effect that can't be accounted for by any known process.