MHB Secant and Tangent Angles in Circles, finding an arc length.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the measures of angles related to secants and tangents in a circle. The user initially arrived at an incorrect arc length of 138.17 and sought clarification on the angles formed by tangents at points P and R. It was established that both angles CPQ and CRQ are 90 degrees due to the properties of tangents. The interior angles of the quadrilateral formed were analyzed, leading to the conclusion that the measure of arc PR is 100 degrees. This illustrates the relationship between angles and arc lengths in circle geometry.
Cj111
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
View attachment 8161

I got 138.17, but that isn't correct. I don't know how to do it, since the only way I thought, gave me the wrong answer. Can anyone help?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    3.6 KB · Views: 122
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would call point $C$ the center of the circle. So, what must the measures of $$\angle CPQ$$ and $$\angle CRQ$$ be?
 
To follow up, since $$\overline{QP}$$ and $$\overline{QR}$$ are tangent to the circle, we must have $$\angle CPQ=\angle CRQ=90^{\circ}$$. Since the sum of the interior angles of a quadrilateral is $360^{\circ}$, it follows then that:

$$100x+81x-1=180\implies x=1$$

And hence, $$\overset{\frown}{PR}=100^{\circ}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top