Second Moment of Area calculation?

In summary, Laura Morrison was struggling to derive the second moment of area for the weld lines in an image, and found that the formula was in a weird form and was not in the simplest form it could be. After some algebraic manipulation, she was able to derive the parallel axis theorem. She found that the moment of inertia for the horizontal weld line which is b long is essentially zero, and the MOI of a rectangle about its base is d3/3 (the MOI of a rectangle about its centroid is d3/12). The MOI of the vertical lines would be calculated about the top end and would be d3/3 for each side. To correct the MOI from the top to the centroid, she
  • #1
LauraMorrison
26
0
Screen Shot 2014-12-08 at 21.34.39.png


Hi there,
I am covering a topic on welding at university and I am struggling with deriving the second moment area for the structure attached. The desired second moment of area is also given in the attached image.

The first part is particularly confusing to me as I know that the total second moment area for the two vertical rectangles should be d3/6 but it is actually 2d3/3. On wikipedia I found that this is to do with being the moment of inertia for a rectangle collinear with an axis but I am still very confused as to what this means.

Any insight into this would be great,
Thanks,
Laura Morrison
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
LauraMorrison said:
View attachment 76374

Hi there,
I am covering a topic on welding at university and I am struggling with deriving the second moment area for the structure attached. The desired second moment of area is also given in the attached image.

The first part is particularly confusing to me as I know that the total second moment area for the two vertical rectangles should be d3/6 but it is actually 2d3/3. On wikipedia I found that this is to do with being the moment of inertia for a rectangle collinear with an axis but I am still very confused as to what this means.

Any insight into this would be great,
Thanks,
Laura Morrison

I think the trouble you are having with deriving the second moment of area for the weld lines is that the formula in the table attached to the OP is in a weird form, and is certainly not in the simplest form it could be.

If you take what is shown and use the definitions of A and y-bar, substituting them into that formula for I, you will see that after some algebraic manipulation, you wind up essentially with the parallel axis theorem applied to this weld configuration, namely

INA = Iy - A * (y-bar)2, where

INA - moment of inertia about the centroidal axis
Iy - moment of inertia about the top of the section
A - weld area
y-bar - centroid location

Remember, the moment of inertia of the horizontal weld line which is b long is essentially zero, and the MOI of a rectangle about its base is d3/3 (the MOI of a rectangle about its centroid is d3/12). Since there are two vertical weld lines both d long, their combined MOI is 2d3/3, which then must be modified to obtain the MOI about the centroid of the entire section by applying the PAT.
 
  • #3
What a great explanation. Just one last question about this, when performing the parallel axis theorem on the vertical weld lines (of height d) should I calculate the distance from the bottom of the weld lines to the neutral axis or is it the distance from their centroids to the neutral axis? And how would you work out these distances?

This is the only thing that is still confusing me. You have been a great help, thank you very much.
 
  • #4
LauraMorrison said:
What a great explanation. Just one last question about this, when performing the parallel axis theorem on the vertical weld lines (of height d) should I calculate the distance from the bottom of the weld lines to the neutral axis or is it the distance from their centroids to the neutral axis? And how would you work out these distances?

This is the only thing that is still confusing me. You have been a great help, thank you very much.

I think for the welding illustrated in the OP, it would be simpler to calculate the MOI about the top of the section, and then apply the PAT to calculate the MOI of the welding about the centroid, which is located y-bar below the top. In this case, the MOI of the vertical lines would be calculated about the top end and would be d3/3 for each side. You have two vertical sides, so the MOI is thus 2d3/3, and the MOI of the top piece is negligible. To correct the MOI from the top to the centroid, you must subtract A*(y-bar)2 from the MOI about the top,

so MOI(centroid) = 2d3/3 - A*(y-bar)2, and

I have seen the formula for the MOI shown on the image attached to the OP on other sites, so it has been copied without anyone checking to see if it is in its simplest form. That particular formula boils down to this:

MOI(centroid) = 2d3/3 - 2A*(y-bar)2 + A*(y-bar)2

which is just

MOI(centroid) = 2d3/3 - A*(y-bar)2

You can always verify the MOI calculation by calculating the inertia of each weld segment about its own centroid, transferring to the top of the weld pattern, and then applying the PAT to correct the MOI back to the centroid of the pattern.
 
  • #5
Perfect I understand now! Thank you :biggrin:
 

FAQ: Second Moment of Area calculation?

What is the Second Moment of Area?

The Second Moment of Area, also known as the moment of inertia, is a measure of an object's resistance to bending or twisting. It is calculated by taking the integral of the cross-sectional area of an object with respect to a given axis.

Why is the Second Moment of Area important in engineering?

The Second Moment of Area is important in engineering because it helps determine an object's structural strength. It is used to calculate the deflection, bending stress, and buckling behavior of beams and other structural components.

How is the Second Moment of Area calculated?

The Second Moment of Area is calculated by first determining the cross-sectional area of the object and then integrating it with respect to the axis of interest. This integral can be solved using various methods, such as the parallel axis theorem or the perpendicular axis theorem.

What factors affect the Second Moment of Area?

The Second Moment of Area is affected by the shape and size of the cross-section of an object, as well as the location of the axis of interest. The material properties, such as the modulus of elasticity, also play a role in determining the Second Moment of Area.

How is the Second Moment of Area used in real-world applications?

The Second Moment of Area is used in many real-world applications, such as designing buildings, bridges, and other structures. It is also used in the design of mechanical components, such as shafts and gears, to ensure they can withstand the necessary forces and loads without failing.

Similar threads

Back
Top