- #1
momo1111
- 13
- 1
sorry about my English
In Purcell 3.7 (Problem) and Griffith there is a question,look at fig.
(we have 4 conductors with charges +Q,-Q,+Q,-Q (b),what will happen
if we connect them with tiny wires in pairs )
Griffith say that c distribution of charge ,can't be a solution
why ?
"because there is 2 conductors ,with total charge 0 on each ,
one possible way to distribute zero charge over is to have no
accumulation of charge anywhere " by Second Uniqueness Theorem
d is the solution
I know that d is a solution , but c could be a solution too ,
why we choose d to be the solution ??
Uniqueness Theorem say that if you found one is unique,
and we found two.
i could say c is a solution ,
"because there is 2 conductors ,with total charge 0 on each ,
one possible way to distribute zero charge over is to have
minus charge and pluses charge at the "ends" ...
by Second Uniqueness Theorem
c is the solution
?
help
Homework Statement
In Purcell 3.7 (Problem) and Griffith there is a question,look at fig.
(we have 4 conductors with charges +Q,-Q,+Q,-Q (b),what will happen
if we connect them with tiny wires in pairs )
Griffith say that c distribution of charge ,can't be a solution
why ?
"because there is 2 conductors ,with total charge 0 on each ,
one possible way to distribute zero charge over is to have no
accumulation of charge anywhere " by Second Uniqueness Theorem
d is the solution
Homework Equations
I know that d is a solution , but c could be a solution too ,
why we choose d to be the solution ??
Uniqueness Theorem say that if you found one is unique,
and we found two.
i could say c is a solution ,
"because there is 2 conductors ,with total charge 0 on each ,
one possible way to distribute zero charge over is to have
minus charge and pluses charge at the "ends" ...
by Second Uniqueness Theorem
c is the solution
The Attempt at a Solution
?
help