- #1
Osiris
Hi,
Can anybody tell me precisely the nature of the Seebeck effect which
enters in the hot-probe test to determine the nature of doping in a
semiconductor ?
That is, I need the explanation of why we can measure a potential when
the com electrode is heated when the electrodes are connected at two ends
of a doped semiconductor.
I've seen that if a Si wafer is doped with n_d=1e16 cm^{-3} of donor
material, then at room temp. we have n=1e16/cc and p=1e4/cc so that
np=n_i^2=1e20 at 300K
at 400K n_i=1e13/cc, so n=1e16/cc and p=1e10/cc so that
np=1e26 at 400K.
here are some explanations that describe the exact opposite of the
experiment, but I don't see why ! Can you help, please?
a) The diffusivity of both holes and electrons decreases with T.
So the flow of electrons in a n-doped Si wafer should be from the cold
side to the hot one. So we should measure a negative potential.
b) The chemical potential decreases as the temperature increases. So the
electron should flow from the cold to the hot region, and again the
optential should be negative.
c) as the density of negative free charges is quite constant, what is
important is the concentration of positive free carrier, that is p.
the we should see a flow
j = - q D (d_x p)
with (d_x p) = (1e10-1e4)/cc /10cm = 1e9 /cc/cm
for the gradient of density of the holes in a 10 cm long wafer, we should
see a flow from the high density to the low density of (D=30 cm^2/s)
j = - 3e8 q /cm^2 s
so the hot point is depleted of holes and charged negatively. the voltage
is again negative.
The three explanations gives the same result, so what is wrong in my way
of thinking ?
Can anybody tell me precisely the nature of the Seebeck effect which
enters in the hot-probe test to determine the nature of doping in a
semiconductor ?
That is, I need the explanation of why we can measure a potential when
the com electrode is heated when the electrodes are connected at two ends
of a doped semiconductor.
I've seen that if a Si wafer is doped with n_d=1e16 cm^{-3} of donor
material, then at room temp. we have n=1e16/cc and p=1e4/cc so that
np=n_i^2=1e20 at 300K
at 400K n_i=1e13/cc, so n=1e16/cc and p=1e10/cc so that
np=1e26 at 400K.
here are some explanations that describe the exact opposite of the
experiment, but I don't see why ! Can you help, please?
a) The diffusivity of both holes and electrons decreases with T.
So the flow of electrons in a n-doped Si wafer should be from the cold
side to the hot one. So we should measure a negative potential.
b) The chemical potential decreases as the temperature increases. So the
electron should flow from the cold to the hot region, and again the
optential should be negative.
c) as the density of negative free charges is quite constant, what is
important is the concentration of positive free carrier, that is p.
the we should see a flow
j = - q D (d_x p)
with (d_x p) = (1e10-1e4)/cc /10cm = 1e9 /cc/cm
for the gradient of density of the holes in a 10 cm long wafer, we should
see a flow from the high density to the low density of (D=30 cm^2/s)
j = - 3e8 q /cm^2 s
so the hot point is depleted of holes and charged negatively. the voltage
is again negative.
The three explanations gives the same result, so what is wrong in my way
of thinking ?