- #1
Humanlimits
- 6
- 5
I'm usually entirely autonomous in planning out my curriculum (and have read much great advice here in aid); but my physics curriculum is proving more difficult to plan out than my math curriculum.
I was thinking as a start: Kleppner & Kolenkow Mechanics, Purcell Electricity and Magnetism, and AP French for Waves/Relativity; probably read along with the Feynman Lectures concurrently. I was wondering if after completely going through the aforementioned texts, if the Sommerfeld lectures on physics would be enough to make Landau & Lifshitz accessible.
There's also the angle I've read from a UChicago page suggesting if I'm proficient enough at math there's not much reason to read anything besides Goldstein and then Landau (for mechanics alone). Then of course there are those sort of physics for mathematicians books by people like Arnold and Spivak.
I enjoy reading a variety of books on a subject, and understand well the value of practice, but also want to make sure my time is spent wisely.
all advice is appreciated
I was thinking as a start: Kleppner & Kolenkow Mechanics, Purcell Electricity and Magnetism, and AP French for Waves/Relativity; probably read along with the Feynman Lectures concurrently. I was wondering if after completely going through the aforementioned texts, if the Sommerfeld lectures on physics would be enough to make Landau & Lifshitz accessible.
There's also the angle I've read from a UChicago page suggesting if I'm proficient enough at math there's not much reason to read anything besides Goldstein and then Landau (for mechanics alone). Then of course there are those sort of physics for mathematicians books by people like Arnold and Spivak.
I enjoy reading a variety of books on a subject, and understand well the value of practice, but also want to make sure my time is spent wisely.
all advice is appreciated