Segway balance question (inverted pendulum)

In summary, the rider keeps balance because the inertial torque acting on the rider balances the torque created by gravity.
  • #1
fizzyfiz
36
1
Summary: Why does segway rider who leans forward when accelerating keep balanced ? Is it because the inertial torque acting on the rider balances the torque created by gravity?

F=-ma
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The accelerating force comes from friction with the ground. That creates a real torque, which could flip the rider over backwards. Leaning forward can use gravity to balance this torque.
 
  • #3
What if we move along frictionless ground?
 
  • Like
Likes PhanthomJay
  • #4
fizzyfiz said:
What if we move along frictionless ground?
You can still balance using the wheels as flywheels, but you cannot accelerate linearly.
 
  • #5
The thing is , I am obliged to solve a segway problem, which accelerates linearly along frictionless plane. The rider is treated as massles rod with the point mass at its end and I am wondering what is condition that rider does not fall.
 
  • #6
I moved this thread to a homework forum.

@fizzyfiz , show us your attempt at solving the problem. Then we can see if you went wrong, and hint how to fix it.
 
  • #7
fizzyfiz said:
I am obliged to solve a segway problem, which accelerates linearly along frictionless plane...
A horizontal plane? You cannot accelerate using wheels on a horizontal frictionless plane.
 
  • #8
If the plane is frictionless, the Segway (and rider) would not be able to move (as in locomotion) linearly.

On the other hand, if the goal is simply to keep the rider upright, even if the rider leans forward or backward (or is perturbed slightly), that's a different story! 😉

@fizzyfiz, what are your ideas on how the rider can stay balanced [on a friction-less plane], even if he doesn't care about traveling anywhere?

[Edit: Here's a hint: the wheels of a Segway have a decently large radius and a fair amount of mass to them; they're not small, light little things. Why is that?]
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Okay, here is the thing, the rider accelerates on segway. He leans forward making angle alpha with respect to vertical axes. I know the moment of inertia of axe, wheels and engine combined. I know radius of wheels. The rider might be treated as massless rod with point mass at its end. I know the center of mass of the system and mass of the rider and segway combined. I should omit air resistance and friction. My task is to derive equation of acceleration.
 
  • #10
fizzyfiz said:
Okay, here is the thing, the rider accelerates on segway. He leans forward making angle alpha with respect to vertical axes. I know the moment of inertia of axe, wheels and engine combined. I know radius of wheels. The rider might be treated as massless rod with point mass at its end. I know the center of mass of the system and mass of the rider and segway combined. I should omit air resistance and friction. My task is to derive equation of acceleration.
That sounds like a fair amount of good information for your model. I have to ask though, when you say you are tasked with deriving an equation for "acceleration," do you mean "angular acceleration" of the wheels? [Edit: or are you asked to find the torque between the axel-wheel-engine combination and the rider?]

At this point it would be really helpful if you could provide a diagram [and details of the model] and show us the work you have so far at deriving the equation.

(Per the forum guidelines, you need to show some work before we can offer you help.)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
fizzyfiz said:
I should omit air resistance and friction. My task is to derive equation of acceleration.
Without friction the the linear acceleration is zero. Maybe they just mean rolling resistance.
 
  • #12
Yes I mean rolling friction :). The picture is in polish, so I will translate it. The diagram on the left shows the segway with rider. The one on the right shows the simplification of rider as massless rod attached to segway with point mass at its end.

"środek masy układu"- center of mass of the system
"oś obrotu o"- axis of rotation of wheels named "o"
"śodek masy osoby jadącej pojazdem"- center of mass of person riding the segway
 

Attachments

  • obrazek forum.PNG
    obrazek forum.PNG
    28.4 KB · Views: 457
Last edited:
  • #13
fizzyfiz said:
Yes I mean rolling friction :). The picture is in polish, so I will translate it. The diagram on the left shows the segway with rider. The one on the right shows the simplification of rider as massless rod attached to segway with point mass at its end.

"środek masy układu"- center of mass of the system
"oś obrotu o"- axes of rotation of wheels named "o"
"śodek masy osoby jadącej pojazdem"- center of mass of person riding the segway
Is there a question here?
 
  • #14
In the picture I attached- no, the task is to derive the equation of linear acceleration knowing: M-mass of the person and segway combined, I-moment of inertia of wheels combined, a-angle between vertical line and peson, L the distance of center of mass from the axe of wheel's rotation, R-radius of wheel.
 
  • #15
fizzyfiz said:
In the picture I attached- no, the task is to derive the equation of linear acceleration knowing: M-mass of the person and segway combined, I-moment of inertia of wheels combined, a-angle between vertical line and peson, L the distance of center of mass from the axe of wheel's rotation, R-radius of wheel.
Okay. Let's see what you can do.
 
  • #16
The torque applied to the center of mass due to gravity is equal to

T=M*g*sin(a)*L

The only force which could balance the torque might be inertial force due to accelerating wheels.
Fb=-MA
A-acceleration

cos(a)*Fb*L+T=0
M*g*sin(a)*L - cos(a)*M*A*L=0
A=g*tan(a)

For me it is suspicious and seems to simple. What went wrong?
 
  • #17
fizzyfiz said:
The torque applied to the center of mass due to gravity is equal to

T=M*g*sin(a)*L

The only force which could balance the torque might be inertial force due to accelerating wheels.
Fb=-MA
A-acceleration

cos(a)*Fb*L+T=0
M*g*sin(a)*L - cos(a)*M*A*L=0
A=g*tan(a)

For me it is suspicious and seems to simple. What went wrong?

Wasn't there a difference between the centre of mass of the man and the centre of mass of the system?
 
  • #18
Yes there were
 
  • #19
fizzyfiz said:
Yes there were
Also, I have to guess what ##M, L## are. You don't say what these variables mean.
 
  • #20
They were stated above- L is the distance of center of mass of the system from the axis of rotation of wheels, M is the mass of person and segway combined.
 
  • #21
PeroK said:
Wasn't there a difference between the centre of mass of the man and the centre of mass of the system?
PS wasn't there a complication that you have to take the motion of the wheels into account? The applied force doesn't only generate linear KE but rotational KE of the wheels?
 
  • #22
Yes there was . What does this imply?
 
  • #23
fizzyfiz said:
Yes it does . What does this imply?
It means you have a lot of work to do!

You can calculate the force first. Then deal with linear acceleration after that.
 
  • #24
okay, so what is wrong about my reasoning?
 
  • #25
fizzyfiz said:
They were stated above- L is the distance of center of mass of the system from the axis of rotation of wheels, M is the mass of person and segway combined.

Why are you using ##M## for the torque? It's only the man who is leaning over.
 
  • #26
fizzyfiz said:
okay, so what is wrong about my reasoning?
I think you have ignored all the complicating factors.
 
  • #27
so I should take into account that the center of mass of the man is leaning over and the center of mass of the system is accelerating linearly?
 
  • #28
fizzyfiz said:
so I should take into account that the center of mass of the man is leaning over and the center of mass of the system is accelerating linearly?
Yes, you need ##m## for the mass of the man; the height of the axle (I assume this is the radius of the wheels); the mass and moment of inertia of the wheels.
 
  • #29
Okay, thank you a lot. I will try to solve it with the restrictions and see what I will got.
 
  • #30
fizzyfiz said:
The torque applied to the center of mass due to gravity is equal to

T=M*g*sin(a)*L

The only force which could balance the torque might be inertial force due to accelerating wheels.
Fb=-MA
A-acceleration

cos(a)*Fb*L+T=0
M*g*sin(a)*L - cos(a)*M*A*L=0
A=g*tan(a)

For me it is suspicious and seems to simple. What went wrong?

I've had a proper look at this. Assuming the man is balanced on an axle, then the kinetics of the wheels may be irrelevant. Unless you need to look at contact forces.

If you just want the acceleration of the system, then that must be equal to the acceleration of the man. So, you can simply look at the forces on the man.

That reduces to your answer, although your calculation to get there might not have been quite right!
 
  • #31
PS The other factors determine the power required by the engine.
 
  • #32
Okay, I tried everything I could and failed. Can someone show me how the acceleration might be derived using Newtonian physics?
 

FAQ: Segway balance question (inverted pendulum)

1. What is a Segway balance question (inverted pendulum)?

A Segway balance question, also known as an inverted pendulum, is a physics problem that involves balancing a pendulum-like structure in an upright position. In the case of a Segway, this involves keeping the rider and the vehicle balanced on two wheels.

2. How does a Segway maintain its balance?

A Segway uses a combination of sensors, motors, and a control system to maintain its balance. The sensors detect the tilt and acceleration of the vehicle, and the control system uses this information to adjust the speed of the motors, keeping the rider and the vehicle in an upright position.

3. What are the main challenges in designing a Segway?

The main challenges in designing a Segway include creating a stable and accurate control system, ensuring the safety of the rider, and optimizing the energy efficiency of the vehicle. Other challenges may include dealing with uneven terrain and varying environmental conditions.

4. Can a Segway balance on its own without a rider?

Yes, a Segway can balance on its own without a rider. However, it requires a rider's weight and movement to maintain its balance while in motion. Without a rider, the Segway will eventually fall over due to the force of gravity.

5. What are some real-world applications of the Segway technology?

The Segway technology has been used in various applications, including personal transportation, patrolling and security, and industrial use. It has also been adapted for use in healthcare, such as assisting individuals with mobility impairments. In addition, the Segway technology has been incorporated into robotics and self-balancing vehicles.

Similar threads

I Exploring the Physics of a Self-Balancing Electric Unicycle
Replies
10
Views
3K
Inverted pendulum -- What force is applied at the center of mass?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Making an electric unicycle really self-balanced
Replies
6
Views
2K
I How Does Changing Mass and Spring Force Affect Watch Oscillators?
Replies
11
Views
872
Help with Inverted Pendulum on Cart EoM
Replies
1
Views
2K
Throwing baton modeled as inverted pendulum
Replies
1
Views
2K
A Modeling the damping of a physical rigid pendulum
Replies
1
Views
780
Forces applied to a spring-loaded gas pedal
Replies
7
Views
664
Stress on a spaghetti rod balanced from its middle
Replies
6
Views
564
Flywheel Inverted pendulum torque calculation
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top