Selecting three points on a circle

In summary, the problem involves finding the probability that three points selected on the circumference of a circle lie on a semicircle. The solution involves setting up a triple integral and determining the correct limits for the angles. It is also possible to solve the problem using geometry, where the probability is found to be 3/4. Some confusion may arise due to a similar problem being solved in the past, where the probability was found to be 1/4.
  • #1
Saitama
4,243
93
(I am not sure if this is the right place to post it but since my solution involves some Calculus, I decided to post it here.)

(Also, I am not well versed with the correct words and terms to be used while doing geometrical probability problems, I am sorry if I write something wrong. :eek: )

Problem:
Three points are selected on circumference of a circle. Find the probability that they lie on a semicircle.

Attempt:
2mfd5jq.png


$\angle POX=\theta$
$\angle QOX=\alpha$
$\angle ROX=\beta$

I select three arcs on the circle of length $Rd\theta$, $Rd\alpha$ and $Rd\beta$. The probability for P,Q and R to lie in these arc lengths is $\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}$, $\frac{d\alpha}{2\pi}$ and $\frac{d\beta}{2\pi}$ respectively. Hence,

$$dP=\frac{1}{8\pi^3}\,d\theta\,d\alpha\, d\beta$$

The limits for $\beta$ are from $-\pi+\alpha$ to $\pi+\theta$ but these limits only work when $\alpha$ lies from $\theta$ to $\pi+\theta$ and $\theta$ lies from 0 to $2\pi$. Solving the definite integral with these limits and multiplying the result by two gives the correct answer.

My question is whether there is way to identify the correct limits for $\alpha$ and $\beta$ in the first try. I spent quite a lot of time to figure out the correct limits. I initially used the limits $-\pi+\alpha$ to $\pi+\theta$ for $\beta$ and 0 to $2\pi$ for $\alpha$ which gives the incorrect answer. I tried checking different cases to see if my initial limits holds and then I arrived at the correct limits which took up a lot of time. Is there a nicer way to figure out the limits?

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

(I have never formally studied triple integrals, the above integral was set up completely on my intuition so I am not sure if I have done it correctly.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Pranav said:
(I am not sure if this is the right place to post it but since my solution involves some Calculus, I decided to post it here.)

(Also, I am not well versed with the correct words and terms to be used while doing geometrical probability problems, I am sorry if I write something wrong. :eek: )

Problem:
Three points are selected on circumference of a circle. Find the probability that they lie on a semicircle.

Attempt:
2mfd5jq.jpg


$\angle POX=\theta$
$\angle QOX=\alpha$
$\angle ROX=\beta$

I select three arcs on the circle of length $Rd\theta$, $Rd\alpha$ and $Rd\beta$. The probability for P,Q and R to lie in these arc lengths is $\frac{d\theta}{2\pi}$, $\frac{d\alpha}{2\pi}$ and $\frac{d\beta}{2\pi}$ respectively. Hence,

$$dP=\frac{1}{8\pi^3}\,d\theta\,d\alpha\, d\beta$$

The limits for $\beta$ are from $-\pi+\alpha$ to $\pi+\theta$ but these limits only work when $\alpha$ lies from $\theta$ to $\pi+\theta$ and $\theta$ lies from 0 to $2\pi$. Solving the definite integral with these limits and multiplying the result by two gives the correct answer.

My question is whether there is way to identify the correct limits for $\alpha$ and $\beta$ in the first try. I spent quite a lot of time to figure out the correct limits. I initially used the limits $-\pi+\alpha$ to $\pi+\theta$ for $\beta$ and 0 to $2\pi$ for $\alpha$ which gives the incorrect answer. I tried checking different cases to see if my initial limits holds and then I arrived at the correct limits which took up a lot of time. Is there a nicer way to figure out the limits?

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

(I have never formally studied triple integrals, the above integral was set up completely on my intuition so I am not sure if I have done it correctly.)

http://mathhelpboards.com/questions-other-sites-52/unsolved-statistics-questions-other-sites-932.html#post4878

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #3
chisigma said:
http://mathhelpboards.com/questions-other-sites-52/unsolved-statistics-questions-other-sites-932.html#post4878

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Hi chisigma! :)

I don't seem to be able to understand the third point. Can you please explain?

Thanks!
 
  • #4
chisigma said:
http://mathhelpboards.com/questions-other-sites-52/unsolved-statistics-questions-other-sites-932.html#post4878

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

More precisely the probability that, being the fist point in (1,0), the other two points lie in the up half circle is... $\displaystyle P = \frac{1}{4}\ \int_{0}^{1} d x \int_{x}^{1} d y = \frac{1}{4}\ \int_{0}^{1} (1 - x)\ d x = \frac{1}{8}\ (1)$

... and the same if the other two points lie in the down half circle, so that the total probability is $\frac{1}{4}$... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #5
chisigma said:
More precisely the probability that, being the fist point in (1,0), the other two points lie in the up half circle is... $\displaystyle P = \frac{1}{4}\ \int_{0}^{1} d x \int_{x}^{1} d y = \frac{1}{4}\ \int_{0}^{1} (1 - x)\ d x = \frac{1}{8}\ (1)$

... and the same if the other two points lie in the down half circle, so that the total probability is $\frac{1}{4}$... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$

I am not sure if I still get it but is their really no need to define three angles? I mean, can we fix one of the points and deal with only $\alpha$ and $\beta$? :confused:

I am confused by the definite integral you set up. Why not integrate over the complete circle? I know it gives the incorrect answer but I don't see why you should divide the circle into two separate semicircles and then do the integration. :confused:
 
Last edited:
  • #6
chisigma said:
http://mathhelpboards.com/questions-other-sites-52/unsolved-statistics-questions-other-sites-932.html#post4878

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

I apologize for the fact that my answer can have create some misunderstanding but in fact i remembered that o problem similar was resolved more that one year ago in the section 'unsolved statistic problems from other sites'. In that post it was required to compute the probability that, given three random points A, B and C on a circl, the center of the circle lies inside the triangle ABC, and the computed probability was found to be $P= \frac{1}{4}$. In Pranav's question it is required, given three random points A,B and C, to computed the probability that the three points lie on a half circle, which is equivalent to say that the center of the circle lies outside the triangle ABC, so that the requested probability is $P = 1 - \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4}$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #7
chisigma said:
I apologize for the fact that my answer can have create some misunderstanding but in fact i remembered that o problem similar was resolved more that one year ago in the section 'unsolved statistic problems from other sites'. In that post it was required to compute the probability that, given three random points A, B and C on a circl, the center of the circle lies inside the triangle ABC, and the computed probability was found to be $P= \frac{1}{4}$. In Pranav's question it is required, given three random points A,B and C, to computed the probability that the three points lie on a half circle, which is equivalent to say that the center of the circle lies outside the triangle ABC, so that the requested probability is $P = 1 - \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4}$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Hi chisigma!

Both the problems are very similar and both seem to take the same approach. My question is that why we need to separate the circles into two semicircles?

Let get back to my original question. The limit for $\beta$ is from $-\pi+\alpha$ to $\pi+\theta$. As I said before, these limits work only when $\alpha$ lies from $\theta$ to $\pi+\theta$. This is equivalent to dividing the circles into two semicircles. Now if I make $\alpha$ vary from 0 to $2\pi$, I get an incorrect answer i.e I did not divide the circle into separate semicircles. Why do I get an incorrect answer? I mean, where is the error? I know the limits for $\beta$ I used doesn't work for the other half of semicircle but I couldn't figure out the error for quite some time and you don't really have that amount of time in the exams. So I want to know if there is a way to figure out the correct limits at the first sight.

Thanks!
 

FAQ: Selecting three points on a circle

How do I select three points on a circle?

To select three points on a circle, you can use a compass and draw a circle on a piece of paper. Then, use the compass to mark three points along the circumference of the circle. These three points will be your selected points on the circle.

What is the purpose of selecting three points on a circle?

Selecting three points on a circle is often used in geometry to find the center of a circle. By connecting the three points and finding the intersection of the lines, you can determine the center point of the circle.

Can I select any three points on a circle?

Yes, you can select any three points on a circle as long as they are distinct and not on the same line. This is necessary for the intersecting lines to accurately determine the center of the circle.

How many ways can I select three points on a circle?

There are infinite ways to select three points on a circle. You can choose any three points along the circumference, as long as they are distinct and not on the same line.

Are there any other applications for selecting three points on a circle?

Besides finding the center of a circle, selecting three points on a circle is also used in trigonometry to calculate the lengths of chords and arcs on a circle. It is also commonly used in design and art for creating symmetrical shapes and patterns.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
935
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
536
Replies
5
Views
813
Back
Top