MHB Self-adjoint operator (Bens question at Yahoo Answers)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
AI Thread Summary
To determine if the linear map T represented by the matrix is self-adjoint when the basis E is not orthonormal, one must consider the Gram matrix G associated with the inner product defined by E. The condition for T to be self-adjoint is that the equation A^T G = G A holds true, where A is the matrix of T. If E were orthonormal, the condition simplifies to A being symmetric, or A^T = A. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the inner product's expression and the role of the Gram matrix in establishing self-adjointness. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing linear maps in non-orthonormal bases.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Self-adjoint operator (Ben's question at Yahoo! Answers)

Here is the question:

I have matrix that represent T:V -> V (linear map over $\mathbb{R}$) according to basis $E$.

E is not an orthonormal set.

how can I know if this T is self-adjoin ?

I know that if E was orthonormal basis we would take the transpose matrix.

but what about here ?

the matrix is :

1 2
2 1

Here is a link to the question:

Self-adjoint and properties? - Yahoo! Answers


I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Ben,

We need the expression of the inner product. Suppose $G$ is the Gram matrix of the inner product with respect to $E$ and $A$ is the matrix of $T$ with respect to $E$. Denote $X,Y$ the coordinates of $x,y$ respectively with respect to $E$. Then,

$$T\mbox{ is self-adjoint}\Leftrightarrow\; <T(x),y>=<x,T(y)>\quad \forall x\forall y\in V$$
We can express
$$<T(x),y>=(AX)^TGY=X^TA^TGY\\<x,T(y)>=X^TG(AY)=X^TGAY$$ Then, $$X^TA^TGY=X^TGAY\Leftrightarrow X^T(A^TG-GA)Y=0$$ This happens for all $X,Y$ if and only if $A^TG=GA$. So, $$\boxed{T\mbox{ is self-adjoint}\Leftrightarrow A^TG=GA}$$ Particular case: If $E$ is orthonormal then $G=I$, so $T$ is self-adjoint if and only if $A^T=A$ (i.e. $A$ is symmetric).
 
Fernando Revilla said:
$$T\mbox{ is self-adjoint}\Leftrightarrow\; <T(x),y>=<x,T(y)>\quad \forall x\forall y\in V$$

You can use the \langle and \rangle commands in $\LaTeX$ to get better-looking inner products:

$$\langle T(x),y \rangle = \langle x,T(y) \rangle \quad \forall x,y \in V.$$
 
Ackbach said:
You can use the \langle and \rangle commands in $\LaTeX$ to get better-looking inner products:

Thanks, I knew those commads but for me is better-looking < and >. Only a question of particular taste. :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top