Sequential Stern Gerlech experiment

In summary, the Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment is a series of experiments designed to demonstrate the quantization of angular momentum in particles, particularly electrons. It involves sending a beam of particles through a non-uniform magnetic field, which causes the particles to deflect based on their spin states. By sequentially applying multiple Stern-Gerlach apparatuses, researchers can analyze the outcomes and confirm the discrete nature of spin states, illustrating fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and the behavior of particles at the quantum level.
  • #1
Rayan
17
1
Homework Statement
A beam of atoms with ##l=1## (##s= 0##) is traveling along the y-axis and passes through a Stern-Gerlach magnet A with its (mean) magnetic field along the x-axis. The emerging beam with ##m_x= 1## is separated from the other two beams. (The eigenvalue of ##L_x## for the atoms in this beam is ##\hbar m_x = \hbar##). The beam is then passed through a second Stern-Gerlach magnet with the magnetic field along the z-axis. Into how many beams is the beam further split and what the relative number of atoms in each beam? What would be the result if the ##m_x= 0## beam instead passed through a second magnet with the magnetic field along the z_axis?
Relevant Equations
.
So I thought that when the $m_l = 1$ beam passes through the second SG-magnet, it should split into 3 different beams with equal probability corresponding to $ m_l = -1 , 0 , 1 $ since the field here is aligned along z-axis and hence independent of the x-axis splitting.
And I thought that the same should happen if the $m_x=0$ beam passes through the second magnet? but I'm not as sure here!
and then there is a hint that says I should determine the eigenstates of the $L_x$ operator first! But I don't get why? Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Rayan said:
And I thought that the same should happen if the $m_x=0$ beam passes through the second magnet? but I'm not as sure here!
and then there is a hint that says I should determine the eigenstates of the $L_x$ operator first! But I don't get why? Any advice?
That's effectively a guess. It's a good hint to check your guess by looking precisely at how the eigenstates for a spin-1 particle about the x-y-z axes relate to each other.
 
  • #3
Rayan said:
and then there is a hint that says I should determine the eigenstates of the $L_x$ operator first! But I don't get why? Any advice?
So you're not just guessing what the answers are. It's okay use your intuition to make an educated guess what the answer should be, but you still need to do the actual math to make a convincing argument.
 
  • #4
Rayan said:
and then there is a hint that says I should determine the eigenstates of the $L_x$ operator first! But I don't get why? Any advice?
Let ##| L_z, m_z \rangle## denote an eigenstate of the ##L_z## operator which has eigenvalue ##m_z \hbar##. What are the possible values of ##m_z##?

Let ##| L_x, m_x \rangle## denote an eigenstate of the ##L_x## operator which has eigenvalue ##m_x \hbar##. What are the possible values of ##m_x##?

Suppose the angular momentum state of the particle is known to be ##| L_x, m_x \rangle##. If a measurement of the z-component of angular momentum is made on this particle, what are the possible outcomes of the measurement?

Using the notation ##| L_x, m_x \rangle## and ##\langle L_z, m_z |##, how would you construct an expression for the probability amplitude that the measurement will yield the outcome ##m_z \hbar##?

How do you obtain the probability that the outcome will be ##m_z \hbar##?
 

FAQ: Sequential Stern Gerlech experiment

What is a Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment?

A Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment involves passing particles, such as electrons or atoms, through multiple Stern-Gerlach apparatuses in sequence. Each apparatus is designed to measure the spin component of the particles along different axes, allowing for the study of quantum spin and the effects of measurement on quantum systems.

How does the Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment demonstrate the principles of quantum mechanics?

The Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment demonstrates key principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and the collapse of the wavefunction. When particles are passed through sequential Stern-Gerlach devices aligned along different axes, the results show that the act of measurement affects the state of the particles, illustrating the probabilistic nature of quantum states and the concept of quantum entanglement.

What are the typical outcomes when particles pass through a Sequential Stern-Gerlach apparatus?

When particles pass through a Sequential Stern-Gerlach apparatus, the outcomes depend on the alignment of the measurement axes. For instance, if the first apparatus measures spin along the z-axis and the second along the x-axis, the particles will be found in a superposition state after the first measurement. The second measurement will then collapse this superposition into one of the eigenstates of the x-axis spin component, showing the non-commutative nature of quantum measurements.

Why is the Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment important in quantum mechanics?

The Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment is important because it provides clear, experimental evidence of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, such as the uncertainty principle and the non-commutativity of quantum measurements. It helps to illustrate how quantum states are altered by measurements and how different observables can be incompatible, offering deeper insights into the behavior of quantum systems.

What challenges arise in conducting a Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment?

Conducting a Sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment presents several challenges, including maintaining the coherence of the quantum states as they pass through multiple apparatuses, aligning the magnetic fields precisely, and ensuring that external influences do not disturb the particles. Additionally, the interpretation of the results requires a solid understanding of quantum mechanics and the ability to distinguish between classical and quantum effects.

Back
Top