MHB Seth's question via email about a Laplace Transform

AI Thread Summary
The Laplace Transform of the function \( 36\left[ \frac{\cosh{\left( 4\,t \right) } - 1}{t} \right] \) is derived using the property for transforms of the form \( \frac{f(t)}{t} \). The function \( f(t) \) is identified as \( \cosh{\left( 4\,t \right)} - 1 \), leading to the transform \( F(s) = \frac{s}{s^2 - 16} - \frac{1}{s} \). The integral for the Laplace Transform is evaluated, resulting in the expression \( -\frac{1}{2} \ln{\left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right|} \). The final result must include the factor of 36, confirming the correct application of the transform.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Find the Laplace Transform of $\displaystyle 36\left[ \frac{\cosh{\left( 4\,t \right) } - 1}{t} \right] $.

Since this is of the form $\displaystyle \frac{f\left( t \right)}{t} $ we should use $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}\,\left\{ \frac{f\left( t \right) }{t} \right\} = \int_s^{\infty}{F\left( u \right) \,\mathrm{d}u } $.

Here $\displaystyle f\left( t \right) = \cosh{\left( 4\,t \right) } - 1 $ and so

$\displaystyle F\left( s \right) = \frac{s}{s^2 - 16} - \frac{1}{s} $

Therefore

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{L}\,\left\{ \frac{\cosh{\left( 4\,t \right) } - 1}{t} \right\} &= \int_s^{\infty}{ \left( \frac{u}{u^2 - 16} - \frac{1}{u} \right) \,\mathrm{d}u } \\
&= \lim_{b \to \infty}\int_s^b{ \left( \frac{u}{u^2 - 16} - \frac{1}{u} \right) \,\mathrm{d}u } \\
&= \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \frac{1}{2}\,\ln{\left| u^2 - 16 \right| } - \ln{\left| u \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| u^2 - 16 \right| } - 2\,\ln{ \left| u \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| u^2 - 16 \right| } - \ln{ \left| u^2 \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| \frac{u^2 - 16}{u^2} \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{u^2} \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left\{ \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{b^2} \right| } \right] - \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right| }\right\} \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \left( \ln{ \left| 1 - 0 \right| } - \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right| } \right) \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left( 0 - \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right| } \right) \\ &= -\frac{1}{2} \, \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right| } \end{align*} $
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That seems correct to me, I check the tables, you forgot the factor of 36 out front tho.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top