Should be very simple F=ma question

  • Thread starter Asphyxiated
  • Start date
  • Tags
    F=ma
In summary: I'll check back in around 10 am EST.In summary, the conversation revolves around a hot air balloon with a total mass of 300 kg and an upward buoyant force of 3000 N due to hot air. The question asks for the mass of sand that must be thrown overboard in order for the balloon to acquire an upward acceleration of 5 m/s^2. The conversation discusses various equations and approaches, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the mass of sand to be thrown overboard is 14kg.
  • #1
Asphyxiated
264
0

Homework Statement



A group of folks are riding in a hot air balloon 60 m above the ground. The total mass of the balloon and its occupants is 300 kg. The balloon is stationary in the air due to the upward buoyant force of the hot air. Do a free body diagram of the balloon. If the buoyant force remains constant what mass of sand must be thrown overboard so that the balloon acquires an upward acceleration of 5m/s^2?

Homework Equations



[tex] F=ma [/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I would like to preface this by saying that this is a calculus based physics course, so I may need to use calculus here to figure this out, but I am not sure and the instructor said we would only need F=ma to do all the problems, anyway here is my logic, which doesn't end well.

If the balloon is being keep at a constant level of 60 m about the ground then there must be a constant upward acceleration of 10m/s^2 to fight the gravitational constant of -10m/s^2 (we are rounding here for this first assignment, I know 9.8m/s^2 is closer to what it really is), so the hot air buoyant force must be:

[tex] F=(300)(10)=3000N=3kN [/tex]

so, as the problem states, the 3kN is constant and the new acceleration of .5 m/s^2 should also be constant in the equation:

[tex] 3000=m(.5) \;\; or \;\; m=\frac {F}{a} [/tex]

which would give me a mass of 6000kg, which is obviously wrong, they are looking for the change in mass which implies derivative I would think. Would that be the correct way to think about it? I have been trying to figure it out for a couple hours today, thanks for any guidance!

Edit__________________________________________

And if so would the derivative be:

[tex] F'=ma'+am' [/tex]

?

If not please show me the way to get there, or where i should start, thanks again!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You might want to consider thinking in terms of forces being applied, rather than accelerations. Accelerations are the result of forces.

Essentially, you determined the force of buoyancy by equating its magnitude with the gravitational force. If some mass, m, of sand were pitched over the side, what would be the new force due to gravity on the remaining mass of the balloon and its contents?
 
  • #3
Well whatever mass, m, you throw overboard will decrease the force due to gravity proportionally by a constant k in which k=10 by which i mean if you were to throw 10kg of sand over the side you would lose k10N or 100N of force due to gravity.

So i could, technically say that:

[tex] a = \frac {F}{m} [/tex]

and incrementally lower m till a ~ 10.5 which is 14kg, which is what they are looking for, so if i do:

[tex] m = \frac {10.5}{3000} = 285.71 kg [/tex]

round up to get 286 or 14kg less than the previous mass, correct way to look at it?
 
  • #4
Tossing out mass both lowers the mass of the rig (increasing acceleration) and lowers the force due to gravity (increasing the acceleration). The effects are compounded. How about giving the 'traditional' approach a try?

You have a constant upward force due to buoyancy, Fb = 3000N.

You have an initial mass M = 300kg.

Force due to gravity is Fg = M*g = 3000N. Initially this balances the buoyant force:

Fnet = Fb - Fg = 0

The net mass of the rig is currently Mnet = M.

The acceleration is given by a = Fnet/Mnet, or zero in this case since Fnet = 0.

Now throw out some amount of mass, m. What are the new values for Fnet and Mnet? What is the new acceleration?
 
  • #5
Perhaps I should just wait and ask tomorrow, I am really not getting what you are telling me for some reason, sorry. If you want to try to correct me here I tried it this way, which seems to be the way you are going but definitely doesn't come out right.

So if Fb=3000N and is constant and Fg could be stated as (10)Mnet and we define Mnet as Mi-Mt where Mi is initial mass and Mt is mass thrown out and acceleration is:

[tex] a = \frac {F_{net}}{M_{net}} [/tex]

[tex] a = \frac {F_{b}-F_{g}}{M_{i}-M_{t}} [/tex]

[tex] a = \frac {F_{b}-10(M_{i}-M_{t})}{M_{i}-M_{t}} [/tex]

[tex] aM_{i}-aM_{t}=F_{b}-10M_{i}+10M_{t} [/tex]

[tex] -10aM_{t}=F_{b}-10aM_{i} [/tex]

[tex] M_{t}= \frac {F_{b}-10aM_{i}}{-10a} [/tex]

and when you sub in the values there I get 100 for Mt if a=5 or if a=10.5 i get around 186, so it is quite obvious to me that I really don't understand what is going on here, is that even what you meant to do, in general?

Sorry for all the confusion
 
  • #6
Asphyxiated said:
Perhaps I should just wait and ask tomorrow, I am really not getting what you are telling me for some reason, sorry. If you want to try to correct me here I tried it this way, which seems to be the way you are going but definitely doesn't come out right.

So if Fb=3000N and is constant and Fg could be stated as (10)Mnet and we define Mnet as Mi-Mt where Mi is initial mass and Mt is mass thrown out and acceleration is:

[tex] a = \frac {F_{net}}{M_{net}} [/tex]

[tex] a = \frac {F_{b}-F_{g}}{M_{i}-M_{t}} [/tex]

[tex] a = \frac {F_{b}-10(M_{i}-M_{t})}{M_{i}-M_{t}} [/tex]

[tex] aM_{i}-aM_{t}=F_{b}-10M_{i}+10M_{t} [/tex]

[tex] -10aM_{t}=F_{b}-10aM_{i} [/tex]

[tex] M_{t}= \frac {F_{b}-10aM_{i}}{-10a} [/tex]

and when you sub in the values there I get 100 for Mt if a=5 or if a=10.5 i get around 186, so it is quite obvious to me that I really don't understand what is going on here, is that even what you meant to do, in general?

Sorry for all the confusion

That's along the lines I had in mind. You went a little awry in your final two lines of the derivation for the throw-away mass, but you're nearly there.
 
  • #7
ok, so I redid it again, how about for the last two lines:

[tex] aM_{i}-aM_{t}=F_{b}-10M_{i}+10M_{t} [/tex]

[tex] -aM_{t}-10M_{t}=F_{b}-10M_{i}-aM_{i} [/tex]

[tex] M_{t}(-a-10)=F_{b}-10M_{i}-aM_{i} [/tex]

[tex] M_{t}= \frac{F_{b}-10M_{i}-aM_{i}} {-a-10} [/tex]

and Fb-10Mi is going to be zero so we can throw that out:

[tex] M_{t} = \frac {-aM_{i}}{-a-10} [/tex]

subbing the values:

[tex] M_{t} = \frac {-(.5)(300)}{-.5-10} = \frac {-150}{-10.5} = 14.28 kg [/tex]

sounds right to me, especially mathematically this time, is that the correct way to do that then?
 
  • #8
Your algebra looks good. Why did you use .5 for the desired acceleration?
 
  • #9
Looks like i had a typo at the start of the problem, the desired acceleration is .5 m/s^2 not 5 m/s^2. Evidently I need to watch out for that too, lol.
 
  • #10
Too bad. The answer works out to a nice round number when the acceleration is 5m/s^2 !
 
  • #11
Ha yeah that is true, I triple checked though and it is certainly asking for 0.5 m/s^2.

Thanks for all the help though man
 
  • #12
Post #3 was the correct analysis. The force on the balloon when it is accelerating is equal to the buoyant force minus the weight of the balloon at its new mass.
 

Related to Should be very simple F=ma question

Question 1: What is the formula for F=ma?

The formula for F=ma states that force (F) is equal to mass (m) multiplied by acceleration (a).

Question 2: What are the units for F=ma?

The units for force (F) are measured in Newtons (N), mass (m) in kilograms (kg), and acceleration (a) in meters per second squared (m/s^2).

Question 3: How is F=ma used in physics?

F=ma is a fundamental equation in physics that is used to calculate the force acting on an object when its mass and acceleration are known. It is commonly used in Newton's laws of motion and in many other areas of physics.

Question 4: Can F=ma be used for both linear and rotational motion?

Yes, F=ma can be used for both linear and rotational motion. In linear motion, the force and acceleration act in the same direction, while in rotational motion, the force and acceleration act at a perpendicular distance from each other.

Question 5: Is F=ma always true?

No, F=ma is not always true. It is only applicable in situations where the mass of the object and the acceleration acting on it remain constant. If there are other factors such as friction or air resistance, the equation may need to be modified to account for these variables.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
564
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
5
Replies
170
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
815
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
370
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
1K
Back
Top