Should David Gregory be Prosecuted

  • News
  • Thread starter Mentalist
  • Start date
In summary, a poll was added regarding a display of a high-capacity ammunition magazine on "Meet the Press" in Washington D.C. The decision has been made that no employees of NBC will face criminal charges for the violation. However, there is still debate about whether or not stricter gun rules and enforcement of existing laws should result in prosecution. The conversation also touches on the importance of using discretion and not viewing the world in black-and-white.

Should David Gregory be Prosecuted?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 2 100.0%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
  • #1
Mentalist
Poll added...

Recently he displayed a 30 round cartridge magazine in the state of Washington D.C. on "Meet the Press." What I am wondering here is, for those saying we need stricter gun rules and enforce the existing laws, should he be prosecuted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Moot point, since the decision has been made:

No employees of NBC will face criminal charges over the display of a high-capacity ammunition magazine on a "Meet the Press" program in violation of local law in Washington, prosecutors told the network on Friday.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/11/politics/guns-nbc/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

But I vote "no". Laws still require judgement when being applied, the world is not always black-and-white.
 
  • #3
lisab said:
Laws still require judgement when being applied, the world is not always black-and-white.

Post of the year. Everyone should have discretion.

"He who joyfully marches to music rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice." - Einstein

Replace the military reference with not using discretion and my god would the world be a better place.
 
  • #4
Since the decision has already been made, thread closed.
 
  • #5


As a scientist, my response to this question would be that it ultimately depends on the laws and regulations in place in Washington D.C. regarding the possession and display of firearm accessories. If it is illegal to possess or display a 30 round cartridge magazine in Washington D.C., then David Gregory should be held accountable for his actions and potentially face prosecution. However, if the possession and display of such an accessory is not explicitly prohibited by law, then it would be up to the legal system to determine if his actions were in violation of any other laws or regulations. It is important to uphold and enforce existing laws, but it is also crucial to ensure that any prosecution is based on solid evidence and adherence to due process. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not David Gregory should be prosecuted should be left to the legal system and not simply based on personal opinions or political agendas.
 

FAQ: Should David Gregory be Prosecuted

Should David Gregory face criminal charges for possessing a high-capacity ammunition magazine?

No, David Gregory should not face criminal charges for possessing a high-capacity ammunition magazine. The District of Columbia has specific laws regarding the possession of such magazines, but the law also includes exemptions for members of the media. As a journalist, David Gregory falls under this exemption and therefore should not be prosecuted.

Is it fair for David Gregory to be exempt from prosecution while others have faced charges for the same offense?

While it may seem unfair to some that David Gregory is exempt from prosecution while others have faced charges for the same offense, it is important to remember that the exemption for journalists is a part of the law. In order for the law to be applied equally, it must also be applied to all individuals who fall under the exemption, including members of the media.

What is the purpose of the law regarding high-capacity ammunition magazines in the District of Columbia?

The purpose of the law regarding high-capacity ammunition magazines in the District of Columbia is to limit the potential harm that can be caused by these types of magazines. The law aims to decrease the number of mass shootings and other violent crimes by restricting access to these magazines. However, the exemption for journalists recognizes the importance of a free press and the need for journalists to report on these types of issues.

Does the exemption for journalists make the law regarding high-capacity ammunition magazines ineffective?

No, the exemption for journalists does not make the law regarding high-capacity ammunition magazines ineffective. While it may limit the ability to prosecute individuals who fall under this exemption, the law still serves its purpose of limiting access to these magazines and decreasing the potential for harm. The exemption for journalists is a small aspect of the overall law and should not be seen as rendering it ineffective.

Should there be a re-evaluation of the law to remove the exemption for journalists?

It is up to lawmakers to decide if there should be a re-evaluation of the law to remove the exemption for journalists. However, it is important to consider the implications of such a change. Removing the exemption could potentially hinder the ability of journalists to report on important issues and limit the freedom of the press. Any changes to the law should be carefully considered and weighed against the importance of a free press in society.

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
144
Views
17K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top