- #1
robertya1027
- 5
- 1
I posted a lot of times on reddit, because I don't think I can survive a PhD
Is it OK to get a MS without a PhD (in physics), I feel a little bad about myself for not doing a PhD but I don't think I have the mental capacity to do one anywaysphinds said:And did you have a question or did you just need for us to know that?
Well, it depends on what you want to do. In any case, if you've done enough to get a masters then you have a good idea of what it would take to do the PhD so knowing that, if you don't think that's the right thing for you, it's hard to see how you would be wrong.robertya1027 said:Is it OK to get a MS without a PhD (in physics), I feel a little bad about myself for not doing a PhD but I don't think I have the mental capacity to do one anyways
Then don't. Most people don't do a PhD. If you don't get a PhD, you will have a lot of company.robertya1027 said:I cannot see myself doing a PhD
What about industry?Orodruin said:Define ”OK”. It depends on what your aim is here. Obviously, not everyone does a PhD after a master and they generally get jobs. However, if your aim is to stay in academia, then a PhD would be a requirement to land most if not all jobs.
Either way, if you believe it would be too stressful for you to the point of affecting your mental health status, then doing a PhD is probably a bad idea. There is indeed quite a high incidence of mental health issues among PhD students.
If you feel your mental health is in danger, then you should contact a professional.
Most industry jobs do not require a PhD and even if you do get into a company that values your PhD, it is most often better for your carreer to start working on your carreer rather than doing the PhD (as in, in the time you would have taken todo the PhD you will instead spend on advancing your carreer in the company and end up further along than the PhD will let you).robertya1027 said:What about industry?
What country (a) are you now studying in, (b) do you plan to work in, and (c) are you a citizen of?robertya1027 said:What about industry?
robertya1027 said:I posted a lot of times on reddit, because I don't think I can survive a PhD
1. I don't want to do a PhD because it's too stressfulStatGuy2000 said:@robertya1027 , I took a brief look at your Reddit posts (posted under the username u/throwRA50950), and I could surmise a few things from your post:
1. You come from a wealthy (or at least well-off) family (since according to one of your posts, your parents are giving you $80000-$100000 each year, ostensibly for your undergraduate studies).
2. In your own words, your GPA "isn't too good, but still acceptable (3.xx GPA)"
3. Almost graduating university (I'm assuming you are graduating from an American university, since you make references to GPA).
4. You are interested in working in software development/programming as a career strategy.
Am I wrong about my summary above? And is there any other information you want to share? Because any additional information will help us on PF give you better advice.
Then why are you even stressing out about it and asking strangers for advice? Just don't get a PhD !robertya1027 said:1. I don't want to do a PhD because it's too stressful
2. I don't NEEED a PhD anyways
robertya1027 said:1. I don't want to do a PhD because it's too stressful
2. I don't NEEED a PhD anyways
@robertya1027, I don't understand why you are posting here at all. No one told you that you need to do a PhD. It's your choice what you need to do.robertya1027 said:1. I don't want to do a PhD because it's too stressful
2. I don't NEEED a PhD anyways
StatGuy2000 said:1. It is OK to get a MS in physics, or in any other field, but this depends on what you want to do career-wise. I don't think a MS in physics will be all that useful for a career in software development (which, based on your posts on Reddit, is what you are interested in). IMO, a MS in computer science may be more useful for you if software development is what you want to do.
I cannot see myself doing a PhD because I do not have a strong interest or passion in a specific research topic that I would want to dedicate several years of my life to.
No, a PhD is not necessary for a successful career in science. While it may open up certain opportunities, there are many successful scientists who do not have a PhD.
Yes, there are many research positions that do not require a PhD. These positions may involve working as a research assistant or technician, or in a support role within a research team.
Yes, there are alternative paths such as obtaining a master's degree, gaining work experience in a relevant field, or pursuing a career in science communication or policy.
It may limit certain opportunities, but there are still many avenues for career advancement without a PhD. Success in science is not solely determined by having a PhD, but also by skills, experience, and determination.