- #36
Smiles302
- 27
- 0
A food scientist's thoughts on the actual paper
Link to full post: http://www.weightymatters.ca/2011/07/can-childhood-obesity-warrant-child.html"
Nobody is arguing kids that are a bit pudgy be taken away, only severely obese children whose health is clearly at risk.
The authors weren't writing about removing kids in homes with excessive junk food and XBOXs, and a few pounds that some chart or physician might suggest they ought to lose. The authors were writing about "severe pediatric obesity", which they defined as a BMI beyond the 99th percentile, and where interventions designed to help those kids' parents failed to help their children
The authors argue that extreme pediatric obesity can be life threatening, that it can cause immediate and potentially irreversible medical complications, and that it can markedly shorten life expectancy. Surprisingly, not mentioned by the authors is the psychosocial impact of severe obesity on children, where studies have documented terrible bullying and stigmatization which in turn impact on a child's mental health and education.
According to American federal laws child abuse and neglect are defined as,
"any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker, which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm ... or an act or failure to act which presents an imminent risk of serious harm"
The authors estimate that for a child to be in the 99th or higher percentile for weight that they are likely consuming a minimum of 1,000 more calories per day. Put in some perspective, that would be the equivalent of 2-3 additional meals worth of calories daily.
Link to full post: http://www.weightymatters.ca/2011/07/can-childhood-obesity-warrant-child.html"
Nobody is arguing kids that are a bit pudgy be taken away, only severely obese children whose health is clearly at risk.
Last edited by a moderator: