Should we replace traditional grading methods with lie detector tests?

  • Thread starter kmarinas86
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Detector
In summary, this conversation is about whether or not lie detector tests can detect lies. No one seems to be sure.
  • #1
kmarinas86
979
1
<sarcasm>Since lie detector tests are very very accurate (like 99%), we should use them as an alternative for human grading. So what do you think? I believe it would obviously work due to the use of the lie detector test in law enforcement. It can save the teacher a lot of time because since the lie detector test knows what is a lie and what is a truth, rather than what is a matter of opinion, feeling, or subjective subconscious inference, it can be used to assess the correctness or wrongness of essays, mutiple choice answers etc. All we have to do is to connect the student to a lie detector while they are giving responses to questions!</sarcasm>
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Uh...ok?
Did one of your teachers suggest this or something?
 
  • #3
I think I could beat the test.
 
  • #4
They aren't 99% accurate.

They probably usually range between 88% and 92% accurate.

Note: I searched for some reference, but couldn't find a good one. My searches get flooded with anti-polygraph sites and other non-sense.

Should we use for educational purposes? If your goal is to reduce your freedoms, then yeah, but for me, hell no.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
JasonRox said:
They aren't 99% accurate.

They probably usually range between 88% and 92% accurate.

Note: I searched for some reference, but couldn't find a good one. My searches get flooded with anti-polygraph sites and other non-sense.

Should we use for educational purposes? If your goal is to reduce your freedoms, then yeah, but for me, hell no.

Of course. But I am 100% sure that the those percentage of accuracy cannot be replicated for all individuals. I am 100% sure that it has some level bias particulary against those with physiological problems or differences. Otherwise we could use them for education gdamit. So why don't we? We could save billions in education (if it actually does what it claims!)

Just divide by .88 or .92 to get the real grade!
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Even if it's accuracy were 99%, a lie detector would only show whether the amount of confidence the person had in his answer, not whether the answer were actually correct.
 
  • #7
BobG said:
Even if it's accuracy were 99%, a lie detector would only show whether the amount of confidence the person had in his answer, not whether the answer were actually correct.

<sarcasm>No. I believe that a lie detector test can detect lies. It can determine which philosophies are invalid.</sarcasm>
 

FAQ: Should we replace traditional grading methods with lie detector tests?

What are the benefits of using lie detector tests for grading?

Lie detector tests offer a more objective and accurate way of evaluating a student's knowledge and understanding compared to traditional grading methods. They also eliminate the potential for human bias or subjectivity in grading.

Are lie detector tests reliable for grading?

Lie detector tests have been shown to be reliable in detecting deception, but they are not infallible. Factors such as the accuracy and calibration of the machine, the expertise of the examiner, and the physiological and psychological state of the test-taker can affect the results.

How do lie detector tests work for grading?

Lie detector tests, also known as polygraph tests, measure physiological responses such as heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration to determine if a person is being truthful. In the context of grading, the test would be administered while the student answers questions related to the subject matter.

What are the potential drawbacks of using lie detector tests for grading?

Some potential drawbacks include the cost and time involved in administering the test, the need for trained examiners, and the potential for false positives or false negatives. Also, the use of such tests in an academic setting raises ethical concerns about privacy and fairness.

Are there any studies or evidence to support the use of lie detector tests for grading?

There is limited research on using lie detector tests for grading in an academic setting. Some studies have shown that they can be effective in detecting deception in specific contexts, but more research is needed to determine their reliability and validity for grading purposes.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
101
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top