Should You Follow Passion or Practicality in Choosing Your College Major?

  • Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolves around the choice between pursuing a degree in electrical engineering for practical reasons or studying astronomy/planetary science, which is the individual's true interest. The discussion also touches on the idea of mixing hobbies and work, with the suggestion to get a degree in a field that has good employment prospects and use the earned money to support one's hobbies and interests.
  • #1
Holocene
237
0
Okay, I had posted before about possibly pursing a degree in electrical engineering. However, I have a confession to make. My only reason for that, is that I would be able to attend school locally, and not have to pay high costs for room and board if I moved away.

However, if I could choose anything at all, I would much rather study something such as astronomy/planetary science. Now, I fully acknowledge that this degree probably isn't as "useful" in terms of finding actual employment, as is the engineering degree, but it's just where I feel my real interest lies.

Given the choice, would choose to save money and get a degree locally, but have it be in something other than your true interest, or would you rather study something you definitely have an interest in, but have to deal with moving away and paying much higher costs?

I mean, I'm starting late at age 24, and frankly the whole idea of living on a college campus makes me sick. Just looking for opinions, as I'm torn on what I should do.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Get a degree in a field you LIKE and has good employment aspects. Use that money you earn to support your interests you LOVE. You can use the money you earn to get a telescope and some books on astronomy.

For the majority of the people out there, mixing hobbies/interests with work/jobs does not work. I love to play PC games, but hate making them. Myself, I don't like making careers and money out of my hobbies. The point of my hobby is to GET AWAY from working and release that stress.
 
  • #3
fizziks said:
Get a degree in a field you LIKE and has good employment aspects. Use that money you earn to support your interests you LOVE. You can use the money you earn to get a telescope and some books on astronomy.

For the majority of the people out there, mixing hobbies/interests with work/jobs does not work. I love to play PC games, but hate making them. Myself, I don't like making careers and money out of my hobbies. The point of my hobby is to GET AWAY from working and release that stress.


Great advice, thank you.
 

FAQ: Should You Follow Passion or Practicality in Choosing Your College Major?

What is a "tough call" in a scientific context?

In a scientific context, a "tough call" refers to a difficult decision that must be made based on available evidence and data. This could involve choosing between competing theories, deciding on a course of action for an experiment, or determining the best way to interpret results.

How do scientists make tough calls?

Scientists make tough calls by carefully evaluating all available evidence and data, considering potential biases and limitations, and using critical thinking and problem-solving skills. They may also consult with other experts in the field and discuss their reasoning and conclusions with colleagues.

What factors should be considered when making a tough call in science?

When making a tough call in science, factors that should be considered include the reliability and credibility of the data and evidence, the potential impact of the decision, and any ethical considerations. Scientists should also consider different perspectives and potential consequences of their decision.

Are there any strategies or frameworks for making tough calls in science?

Yes, there are various strategies and frameworks that can be used when making tough calls in science. These include the scientific method, logical reasoning, risk-benefit analysis, and ethical frameworks such as the "do no harm" principle and the precautionary principle.

How do scientists handle disagreements or conflicting opinions when making tough calls?

When faced with disagreements or conflicting opinions when making tough calls, scientists may engage in open and respectful discussions, present and analyze evidence and data together, and seek out unbiased opinions from other experts. Ultimately, the decision should be based on the best available evidence and data, not personal opinions or biases.

Similar threads

Back
Top