Show that ## 168=3\cdot 7\cdot 8 ## divides ## a^{6}-1 ##

  • Thread starter Math100
  • Start date
In summary: I have to use this additional line, too, given the fact that I am not a number theorist. In fact, I got the ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ## part, mainly because ## a ## is odd and so ## a>0, a\geq 3 ##, that's why I plugged in ## a=3 ## and got ## a^{2}=9, a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ##, but I think this is vague, just as you mentioned above, I should have explained this.
  • #1
Math100
796
221
Homework Statement
If ## gcd(a, 42)=1 ##, show that ## 168=3\cdot 7\cdot 8 ## divides ## a^{6}-1 ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Suppose ## gcd(a, 42)=1 ##.
Then ## 42=2\cdot 3\cdot 7 ## and ## gcd(a, 2)=gcd(a, 3)=gcd(a, 7)=1 ##.
Applying the Fermat's theorem produces:
## a\equiv 1\pmod {2}, a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {3} ## and ## a^{6}\equiv 1\pmod {7} ##.
This means ## a^{6}=(a^{2})^{3}\equiv 1\pmod {3} ##.
Observe that ## a^{6}-1=(a^{3}-1)(a^{3}+1)=(a-1)(a+1)(a^{2}+a+1)(a^{2}-a+1) ##.
Since ## a ## is odd, it follows that ## a>0\implies a\geq 3 ##.
Now we have ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8}\implies (a^{2})^{3}\equiv 1^{3}\pmod {8}\implies a^{6}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ##.
Thus, ## 168\mid (a^{6}-1) ## because ## 3, 7, 8 ## are relatively prime to each other.
Therefore, if ## gcd(a, 42)=1 ##, then ## 168=3\cdot 7\cdot 8 ## divides ## a^{6}-1 ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: If ## gcd(a, 42)=1 ##, show that ## 168=3\cdot 7\cdot 8 ## divides ## a^{6}-1 ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof:

Suppose ## gcd(a, 42)=1 ##.
Then ## 42=2\cdot 3\cdot 7 ## and ## gcd(a, 2)=gcd(a, 3)=gcd(a, 7)=1 ##.
Applying the Fermat's theorem produces:
## a\equiv 1\pmod {2}, a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {3} ## and ## a^{6}\equiv 1\pmod {7} ##.
This means ## a^{6}=(a^{2})^{3}\equiv 1\pmod {3} ##.
Observe that ## a^{6}-1=(a^{3}-1)(a^{3}+1)=(a-1)(a+1)(a^{2}+a+1)(a^{2}-a+1) ##.
Since ## a ## is odd, it follows that ## a>0\implies a\geq 3 ##.
Now we have ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8}\implies (a^{2})^{3}\equiv 1^{3}\pmod {8}\implies a^{6}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ##.
Thus, ## 168\mid (a^{6}-1) ## because ## 3, 7, 8 ## are relatively prime to each other.
Therefore, if ## gcd(a, 42)=1 ##, then ## 168=3\cdot 7\cdot 8 ## divides ## a^{6}-1 ##.
Right, but what did you use the factorization of ##a^6-1## for? Instead, you should have explained ##a^2\equiv 1\pmod{8}.## E.g. by ##(2k+1)^2=4k(k+1)+1## where either ##k## or ##k+1## is even.
 
  • #3
fresh_42 said:
Right, but what did you use the factorization of ##a^6-1## for? Instead, you should have explained ##a^2\equiv 1\pmod{8}.## E.g. by ##(2k+1)^2=4k(k+1)+1## where either ##k## or ##k+1## is even.
Absolutely nothing. Now, I just realized that I shouldn't factor out ## a^{6}-1 ##, because like you mentioned, I didn't use this on anything in this proof. Also, for the ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ## part, are you saying that letting ## a=2k+1 ## where ## k=2m ## for some ## k\in\mathbb{Z} ## can help better explain where we got the ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ## part from?
 
  • #4
Math100 said:
Absolutely nothing. Now, I just realized that I shouldn't factor out ## a^{6}-1 ##, because like you mentioned, I didn't use this on anything in this proof. Also, for the ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ## part, are you saying that letting ## a=2k+1 ## where ## k=2m ## for some ## k\in\mathbb{Z} ## can help better explain where we got the ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ## part from?
Number theorists have it probably in mind: ##a\equiv 1\pmod{2}\Longrightarrow a^2\equiv 1\pmod{8}## but I had to use this additional line. From ##a\equiv 1\pmod{2}## we get ##a=2k+1## and ##a^2=4k(k+1)+1.## This shows ##a^2\equiv 1\pmod{8}## no matter whether ##k## is odd or even because ##\{k,k+1\}## always contains an even number.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Math100
  • #5
fresh_42 said:
Number theorists have it probably in mind: ##a\equiv 1\pmod{2}\Longrightarrow a^2\equiv 1\pmod{8}## but I had to use this additional line. From ##a\equiv 1\pmod{2}## we get ##a=2k+1## and ##a^2=4k(k+1)+1.## This shows ##a^2\equiv 1\pmod{8}## no matter whether ##k## is odd or even because ##\{k,k+1\}## always contains an even number.
I have to use this additional line, too, given the fact that I am not a number theorist. In fact, I got the ## a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ## part, mainly because ## a ## is odd and so ## a>0, a\geq 3 ##, that's why I plugged in ## a=3 ## and got ## a^{2}=9, a^{2}\equiv 1\pmod {8} ##, but I think this is vague, just as you mentioned above, I should have explained this. Thank you for the additional line.
 

FAQ: Show that ## 168=3\cdot 7\cdot 8 ## divides ## a^{6}-1 ##

1. What does it mean for a number to divide another number?

When a number, called the divisor, divides another number, called the dividend, it means that the result of the division is a whole number without any remainder. In other words, the dividend is evenly divisible by the divisor.

2. How do you show that 168 divides a6-1?

To show that 168 divides a6-1, we need to prove that a6-1 is divisible by 3, 7, and 8, since 168 is the product of these three numbers. This can be done using the rules of divisibility, such as the fact that a number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.

3. Why is it important to show that 168 divides a6-1?

It is important to show that 168 divides a6-1 because it helps us understand the properties of the numbers involved. It also allows us to simplify expressions and solve equations involving these numbers more easily.

4. Can you provide an example to demonstrate the divisibility of 168?

Yes, for example, if we let a=5, then a6-1=15624-1=15623. We can see that 15623 is divisible by 3, 7, and 8, since the sum of its digits is 17, which is divisible by 3, and the last three digits form a number that is divisible by 8. Therefore, we can conclude that 168 divides 15623.

5. What are the applications of showing that 168 divides a6-1?

The applications of showing that 168 divides a6-1 are numerous, as it allows us to simplify and solve various mathematical problems involving these numbers. For example, it can be used in algebraic manipulations, number theory, and cryptography.

Similar threads

Back
Top