Show that 36≤4(s³+t³+u³+v³)-(s⁴+t⁴+u⁴+v⁴)≤48

  • MHB
  • Thread starter anemone
  • Start date
In summary, the given inequality can be proven using algebraic manipulation and properties of exponents. The numbers 36 and 48 represent the upper and lower bounds of the expression, and the inequality can also be solved using calculus. It is always true for all real numbers, and it can be applied in various scientific fields to analyze and solve equations.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Let the real numbers $s,\,t,\,u,\,v$ satisfy the relations $s+t+u+v=6$ and $s^2+t^2+u^2+v^2=12$.

Show that $36 \le 4(s^3+t^3+u^3+v^3)-(s^4+t^4+u^4+v^4) \le 48$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Solution of other:

Observe that

$4(s^3+t^3+u^3+v^3)-(s^4+t^4+u^4+v^4)$

$=-((s-1)^4+(t-1)^4+(u-1)^4+(v-1)^4)+6(s^2+t^2+u^2+v^2)-4(s+t+u+v)+4$

$=-((s-1)^4+(t-1)^4+(u-1)^4+(v-1)^4)+52$

Now, introducing $x=s-1$, $y=t-1$, $z=u-1$, $t=v-1$, we need to prove the inequalities

$4\le x^4+y^4+z^4+t^4\le 16$,

under the constraint $x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2=(s^2+t^2+u^2+v^2)-2(s+t+u+v)+4=4$---(1)

Now, the rightmost inequality in (1) follows from the power mean inequality:

$x^4+y^4+z^4+t^4\ge \dfrac{(x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2)^2}{4}=4$

For the other one, expanding the brackets we note that

$(x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2)^2=(x^4+y^4+z^4+t^4)+q$ where $q$ is a non negative number, so

$x^4+y^4+z^4+t^4\le (x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2)^2=16$ and we're done.
 

Related to Show that 36≤4(s³+t³+u³+v³)-(s⁴+t⁴+u⁴+v⁴)≤48

1. How can I prove that 36 is less than or equal to 4(s³+t³+u³+v³)-(s⁴+t⁴+u⁴+v⁴) which is less than or equal to 48?

This inequality can be proven by using the properties of exponents and algebraic manipulation. We can start by rearranging the terms to get 4(s³+t³+u³+v³) - (s⁴+t⁴+u⁴+v⁴) ≤ 48. Then, we can factor out a common factor of 4 from the first term to get 4(s³+t³+u³+v³) - (s⁴+t⁴+u⁴+v⁴) = 4(s³-t³+u³+v³) - (s⁴-t⁴+u⁴+v⁴). This allows us to use the identity (a³-b³) = (a-b)(a²+ab+b²) to further simplify the expression to 4(s-t)(s²+st+t²+u³+v³) - (s-t)(s³+s²t+st²+t³+u⁴+v⁴). We can then factor out (s-t) from both terms to get (s-t)(4(s²+st+t²)-s³-s²t-st²-t³+u⁴+v⁴). Finally, we can use the identity (a³-b³) = (a-b)(a²+ab+b²) again to simplify the second term to (s-t)((s+t)²-s²t-st²-t³+u⁴+v⁴). This gives us the expression (s-t)(4(s²+st+t²)-(s+t)²)-t³+u⁴+v⁴. Since (s-t) and (s+t) are both positive numbers, we can drop them from the inequality and simplify further to get 4(s²+st+t²)-(s+t)² ≤ 48. From here, we can expand the terms, collect like terms, and solve for the remaining variable to get a final answer of s ≤ 2. Therefore, the original inequality is proven.

2. What is the significance of the numbers 36 and 48 in this inequality?

The numbers 36 and 48 are important because they provide the upper and lower bounds for the inequality. They show that the expression 4(s³+t³+u³+v³)-(s⁴+t⁴+u⁴+v⁴) is bounded between these two values, with 36 being the lower bound and 48 being the upper bound. This allows us to determine the possible range of values that the expression can take on.

3. Can this inequality be solved using any other methods besides algebraic manipulation?

Yes, this inequality can also be solved using calculus. By taking the derivative of the expression with respect to one of the variables, we can find the critical points and determine where the function is increasing or decreasing. This can help us to determine the maximum and minimum values of the expression and confirm that it falls within the range of 36 to 48.

4. Is this inequality always true for all values of s, t, u, and v?

Yes, this inequality is always true for all real numbers s, t, u, and v. This can be proven by substituting in any set of values for the variables and solving the expression. The result will always be a value between 36 and 48.

5. How can this inequality be applied in the field of science?

This inequality can be applied in many areas of science, such as physics, chemistry, and engineering. It can be used to determine the range of values for a particular variable or to solve for unknown quantities in equations. For example, in physics, this inequality could be used to analyze forces and determine the maximum and minimum forces that can be applied without causing a system to fail.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top