Show that it satisfies the equation

  • MHB
  • Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date
In summary: Setting $x=\cos \frac{2 \pi}{5}$ we have the following:$$16\ x^5 - 20\ x^3 + 5\ x -1=0 \Rightarrow (x-1)\ (4\ x^{2} + 2\ x - 1)^{2} = 0$$Since $x \neq 1$, $x$ must satisfy $(4\ x^{2} + 2\ x - 1)^{2}=0$, that means that $x
  • #1
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
5,049
7
Hey! :eek:

How can I show that $2 \cos{\left ( \frac{2 \pi }{5} \right )}$ satisfies the equation $x^2+x-1=0$ ?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mathmari said:
Hey! :eek:

How can I show that $2 \cos{\left ( \frac{2 \pi }{5} \right )}$ satisfies the equation $x^2+x-1=0$ ?? (Wondering)

Starting from the trigonometric identity...

$\displaystyle cos 5\ \theta = 16\ \cos^{5} \theta - 20\ \cos^{3} \theta + 5\ \cos \theta\ (1)$

... setting $x = \cos \theta$ the equation $\cos 5\ \theta= 1$ becomes...

$\displaystyle 16\ x^{5} - 20\ x^{3} + 5\ x - 1 = (x-1)\ (4\ x^{2} + 2\ x - 1)^{2} = 0\ (2)$

... and the soltions of (2) are $\cos 0 = 1$, $\cos \frac{2\ \pi}{5} = \frac{- 1 + \sqrt{5}}{4}$ and $\cos \frac{4\ \pi}{5} = \frac{-1 - \sqrt{5}}{4}$. The rest is easy and is left to You...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #3
mathmari said:
Hey! :eek:

How can I show that $2 \cos{\left ( \frac{2 \pi }{5} \right )}$ satisfies the equation $x^2+x-1=0$ ?? (Wondering)

Hi! (Blush)

Substitute $2\cos\frac {2\pi}{5} = e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}$? (Wondering)
 
  • #4
chisigma said:
Starting from the trigonometric identity...

$\displaystyle cos 5\ \theta = 16\ \cos^{5} \theta - 20\ \cos^{3} \theta + 5\ \cos \theta\ (1)$

... setting $x = \cos \theta$ the equation $\cos 5\ \theta= 1$ becomes...

Why do we set $\cos 5\ \theta= 1$ ?? (Wondering)
 
  • #5
I like Serena said:
Substitute $2\cos\frac {2\pi}{5} = e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}$? (Wondering)

$$\left (2 \cos{\left (\frac{2 \pi}{5}\right )}\right)^2+2 \cos{\left (\frac{2 \pi}{5}\right )}+1=\left ( e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}\right )^2+
e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}+1 \\ =e^{4\pi i/5}+2+e^{-4\pi i/5}+e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}+1=e^{4\pi i/5}+e^{-4\pi i/5}+e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}+3$$

How could I continue?? (Wondering)
 
  • #6
mathmari said:
Why do we set $\cos 5\ \theta= 1$ ?? (Wondering)

... because $\cos (5\ \frac{2\ \pi}{5})= \cos (2\ \pi) = 1$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #7
mathmari said:
$$\left (2 \cos{\left (\frac{2 \pi}{5}\right )}\right)^2+2 \cos{\left (\frac{2 \pi}{5}\right )}+1=\left ( e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}\right )^2+
e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}+1 \\ =e^{4\pi i/5}+2+e^{-4\pi i/5}+e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}+1=e^{4\pi i/5}+e^{-4\pi i/5}+e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}+3$$

How could I continue?? (Wondering)

This is a geometric sequence and:
$$\sum_{k=0}^n a^{}r^k = a\frac{1-r^{n+1}}{1-r}$$

Oh. And you changed a $-$ into a $+$. :eek:
 
  • #8
It can be of some interest to know that an explicit expression derived from quadratic equations [ie expression containing square roots ...] for the amount $\displaystyle \cos \frac{2\ \pi}{n}$ exists if n is a Fermat prime, ie a prime for which is $\displaystyle n= 2^{2^{k}} + 1$. So far we only know the first five Fermat $F_{0}=3$,$F_{1} = 5$, $F_{2}=17$, $F_{3}=257$ and $F_{4}= 65537$. By what follows that the construction by non graded ruler and compass of a regular polygon of n sides is possible if n is a Fermat prime. For n = 3 and n = 5, the procedure has been found by Euclid. For n = 17 the procedure has been found in the nineteenth century. For n = 257 I think it was recently found as yet has not been found for n = 65537 ...

... that's quite a homework for a young MHB talent!;)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #9
chisigma said:
Starting from the trigonometric identity...

$\displaystyle cos 5\ \theta = 16\ \cos^{5} \theta - 20\ \cos^{3} \theta + 5\ \cos \theta\ (1)$

... setting $x = \cos \theta$ the equation $\cos 5\ \theta= 1$ becomes...

$\displaystyle 16\ x^{5} - 20\ x^{3} + 5\ x - 1 = (x-1)\ (4\ x^{2} + 2\ x - 1)^{2} = 0\ (2)$

... and the soltions of (2) are $\cos 0 = 1$, $\cos \frac{2\ \pi}{5} = \frac{- 1 + \sqrt{5}}{4}$ and $\cos \frac{4\ \pi}{5} = \frac{-1 - \sqrt{5}}{4}$. The rest is easy and is left to You...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

$\displaystyle \cos 5\ \theta = 16\ \cos^{5} \theta - 20\ \cos^{3} \theta + 5\ \cos \theta\ $

$\theta=\frac{2 \pi}{5} : $

$\displaystyle \cos 5\ \frac{2 \pi}{5} = 16\ \cos^{5} \frac{2 \pi}{5} - 20\ \cos^{3} \frac{2 \pi}{5} + 5\ \cos \frac{2 \pi}{5}\ \\ \Rightarrow
1 = 16\ \cos^{5} \frac{2 \pi}{5} - 20\ \cos^{3} \frac{2 \pi}{5} + 5\ \cos \frac{2 \pi}{5}\ \\ \Rightarrow 16\ \cos^{5} \frac{2 \pi}{5} - 20\ \cos^{3} \frac{2 \pi}{5} + 5\ \cos \frac{2 \pi}{5} -1=0\ $

Setting $x=\cos \frac{2 \pi}{5}$ we have the following:

$$16\ x^5 - 20\ x^3 + 5\ x -1=0 \Rightarrow (x-1)\ (4\ x^{2} + 2\ x - 1)^{2} = 0$$

Since $x \neq 1$, $x$ must satisfy $(4\ x^{2} + 2\ x - 1)^{2}=0$, that means that $x$ has to satify the equation $4x^2+2x-1=0 \Rightarrow (2x)^2+(2x)-1=0$, which follows that $2x$ satisfies the equation $x^2+x-1=0$.

Therefore, we conlcude that $2 \cos \frac{2 \pi}{5} $ has to satisfy the equation $\ x^2 + \ x - 1=0$.

Is this correct?? (Wondering)
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
This is a geometric sequence and:
$$\sum_{k=0}^n a^{}r^k = a\frac{1-r^{n+1}}{1-r}$$
$$\left (2 \cos{\left (\frac{2 \pi}{5}\right )}\right)^2+2 \cos{\left (\frac{2 \pi}{5}\right )}-1=\left ( e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}\right )^2+
e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}-1 \\ =e^{4\pi i/5}+2+e^{-4\pi i/5}+e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}-1=e^{4\pi i/5}+e^{-4\pi i/5}+e^{2\pi i/5}+e^{-2\pi i/5}+1$$

How is this a geometric sequence, when some powers are positive and other negative??

Do I have to write the terms with negative power in the form $\frac{1}{e^x}$ ?? (Wondering)

I like Serena said:
Oh. And you changed a $-$ into a $+$. :eek:
(Tmi)
 
  • #11
chisigma said:
It can be of some interest to know that an explicit expression derived from quadratic equations [ie expression containing square roots ...] for the amount $\displaystyle \cos \frac{2\ \pi}{n}$ exists if n is a Fermat prime, ie a prime for which is $\displaystyle n= 2^{2^{k}} + 1$. So far we only know the first five Fermat $F_{0}=3$,$F_{1} = 5$, $F_{2}=17$, $F_{3}=257$ and $F_{4}= 65537$. By what follows that the construction by non graded ruler and compass of a regular polygon of n sides is possible if n is a Fermat prime. For n = 3 and n = 5, the procedure has been found by Euclid. For n = 17 the procedure has been found in the nineteenth century. For n = 257 I think it was recently found as yet has not been found for n = 65537 ...

... that's quite a homework for a young MHB talent!;)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Interesting! (Nerd)
 
  • #12
mathmari said:
$\displaystyle \cos 5\ \theta = 16\ \cos^{5} \theta - 20\ \cos^{3} \theta + 5\ \cos \theta\ $

$\theta=\frac{2 \pi}{5} : $

$\displaystyle \cos 5\ \frac{2 \pi}{5} = 16\ \cos^{5} \frac{2 \pi}{5} - 20\ \cos^{3} \frac{2 \pi}{5} + 5\ \cos \frac{2 \pi}{5}\ \\ \Rightarrow
1 = 16\ \cos^{5} \frac{2 \pi}{5} - 20\ \cos^{3} \frac{2 \pi}{5} + 5\ \cos \frac{2 \pi}{5}\ \\ \Rightarrow 16\ \cos^{5} \frac{2 \pi}{5} - 20\ \cos^{3} \frac{2 \pi}{5} + 5\ \cos \frac{2 \pi}{5} -1=0\ $

Setting $x=\cos \frac{2 \pi}{5}$ we have the following:

$$16\ x^5 - 20\ x^3 + 5\ x -1=0 \Rightarrow (x-1)\ (4\ x^{2} + 2\ x - 1)^{2} = 0$$

Since $x \neq 1$, $x$ must satisfy $(4\ x^{2} + 2\ x - 1)^{2}=0$, that means that $x$ has to satify the equation $4x^2+2x-1=0 \Rightarrow (2x)^2+(2x)-1=0$, which follows that $2x$ satisfies the equation $x^2+x-1=0$.

Therefore, we conlcude that $2 \cos \frac{2 \pi}{5} $ has to satisfy the equation $\ x^2 + \ x - 1=0$.

Is this correct?? (Wondering)

Yes, it is!...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #13
chisigma said:
Yes, it is!...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Great! Thank you very much! (Smile)
 

FAQ: Show that it satisfies the equation

What does it mean to "show that it satisfies the equation"?

When asked to show that something satisfies an equation, it means to prove that the given expression or value is a valid solution to the equation. This is typically done by substituting the given value into the equation and showing that the resulting equation is true.

How do I show that something satisfies an equation?

The most common way to show that something satisfies an equation is by substitution. This involves plugging in the given value into the equation and simplifying to show that the equation holds true. Another method is to use algebraic manipulation to transform the equation into a simpler form that makes it easier to verify the given value.

Can I use any value to show that it satisfies an equation?

No, the value used to show that an equation is satisfied must be a valid solution to the equation. This means that it must make the equation true when substituted into it. Using an incorrect or invalid value will not prove that the equation is satisfied.

Do I need to show my work when proving that something satisfies an equation?

Yes, it is important to show your work when proving that something satisfies an equation. This allows others to follow your thought process and understand how you arrived at the solution. It also helps to avoid errors and make your proof more convincing.

Can I use multiple methods to show that something satisfies an equation?

Yes, you can use multiple methods to prove that something satisfies an equation. This can help to provide a more thorough and convincing proof. However, it is important to ensure that all methods used are valid and accurate.

Similar threads

Back
Top