Show that the range of the linear operator is not all of R^3

In summary, to show that the range of the given linear operator is not all of R3, we can find a vector that is not in the range. This can be done by showing that the operator does not have an inverse and is a singular matrix. To find such a vector, we can solve for x, y, and z in the given equations and see if we encounter a problem (such as dividing by 0) for some values of w1, w2, and w3. This will show that the given equations do not have a solution, thus proving that the range of the linear operator is not all of R3.
  • #1
vip_snoopy
4
0

Homework Statement


Show that the range of the linear operator defined by the equations is not all of R3, and find a vector that is not in the range


Homework Equations


w1 = x - 2y + z
w2 = 5x - y + 3z
w3 = 4x + y + 2z


The Attempt at a Solution


can I just show that it does not have an inverse and it's a singular matrix to say it's equivalent to the range is not all or R3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, but you will still have to find a vector that is not in the range. So just find such a vector and solve both problems at once instead.
 
  • #3
strange, my edit was not posted.

My question is actually how to find the vector not in the domain?
 
  • #4
Yes, that is the whole point.

For what values of w1, w2, w3 does
w1 = x - 2y + z
w2 = 5x - y + 3z
w3 = 4x + y + 2z
NOT have a solution.

Just start solving for x, y, and z and see if you run into a problem (probably dividing by 0) for some values of w1, w2, and w3.
 

FAQ: Show that the range of the linear operator is not all of R^3

What does it mean for the range of a linear operator to not be all of R^3?

When we say that the range of a linear operator is not all of R^3, it means that there are some vectors in R^3 that are not mapped to by the operator. In other words, the linear operator does not cover the entire three-dimensional space of R^3.

How can we prove that the range of a linear operator is not all of R^3?

To prove that the range of a linear operator is not all of R^3, we can use the fundamental theorem of linear algebra. This theorem states that the dimension of the range of a linear operator is equal to the rank of the corresponding matrix. Therefore, if the rank of the matrix is less than 3, we can conclude that the range of the linear operator is not all of R^3.

Can a linear operator have a range that is not all of R^3 in any case?

Yes, it is possible for a linear operator to have a range that is not all of R^3 in certain cases. For example, if the matrix representing the operator is singular, meaning it has a determinant of 0, then the rank of the matrix will be less than 3 and the range of the operator will not cover all of R^3.

How does the range of a linear operator relate to its null space?

The range and null space of a linear operator are complementary subspaces. This means that any vector in R^3 can be expressed as a sum of a vector in the range and a vector in the null space. Therefore, if the range of a linear operator is not all of R^3, then the null space must also not be empty.

Why is it important to show that the range of a linear operator is not all of R^3?

It is important to show that the range of a linear operator is not all of R^3 because it tells us about the behavior of the operator and its limitations. It also helps us to understand the structure of the operator and its relationship with other subspaces, such as the null space. Additionally, it can be useful in solving systems of linear equations and determining the invertibility of the operator.

Similar threads

Back
Top