Show that the sequence converges

  • Thread starter ianwood
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sequence
In summary: So what does that mean for the series 1+ 1/2 +1/3 + 1/4 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8 + ...? And then it's easy to show that the limit must be 3/2. Just group the sequence into sums of three consecutive terms, then you can make an argument about the limit of the partial sums.
  • #1
ianwood
3
0
Using the steps below, show that the following sequence converges:
[itex]1+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{5}-\frac{2}{6}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{2}{9}+\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{11}-\frac{2}{12}++-++-...[/itex]

i. Consider the subsequence (s2,s3,s5,s6,s8,s9,...) of the sequence of partial
sums. Show that this is the sequence of partial sums of a related convergent
series.

ii. Show that the original series is also convergent.

I have tried and showed part ii successfully, by considering
[itex]\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{5}-\frac{2}{6}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{2}{9}+\frac{1}{11}-\frac{2}{12}+...[/itex]
[itex]=(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{11}+...)-(\frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{6}+\frac{2}{9}+\frac{2}{12}+...)[/itex]
[itex]=\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{3k-1}-\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{2}{3k}[/itex]

and considering
[itex]1+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{10}+...[/itex]
[itex]=\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{3k-2} [/itex]So the sequence =[itex] \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{9k-4}{3k(3k-2)(3k-1))} [/itex]
is convergent by comparison test
However I am wondering what part (i) is asking. I think (s2,s3,s5,s6,s8,s9,...) is divergent. How can I relate to a convergent series?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ianwood said:
Using the steps below, show that the following sequence converges:
[itex]1+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{5}-\frac{2}{6}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{2}{9}+\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{11}-\frac{2}{12}++-++-...[/itex]

i. Consider the subsequence (s2,s3,s5,s6.s8.s9,...) of the sequence of partial
sums. Show that this is the sequence of partial sums of a related convergent
series.

ii. Show that the original series is also convergent.

I have tried and showed part ii successfully, by considering
[itex]\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{5}-\frac{2}{6}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{2}{9}+\frac{1}{11}-\frac{2}{12}+...[/itex]
[itex]=(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{11}+...)-(\frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{6}+\frac{2}{9}+\frac{2}{12}+...)[/itex]
[itex]=\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{3k-1}-\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{2}{3k}[/itex]

and considering
[itex]1+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{10}+...[/itex]
[itex]=\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{3k-2} [/itex]So the sequence =[itex] \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{9k-4}{3k(3k-2)(3k-1))} [/itex]
is convergent by comparison test
However I am wondering what part (i) is asking. I think (s2,s3,s5,s6.s8.s9,...) is divergent. How can I relate to a convergent series?

You can't regroup into three divergent series and then resum them to get a convergent series. The series isn't absolutely convergent and that doesn't have anything to do with the partial sums. Group the series into sums of three consecutive terms, then you can make some argument about the limit of the partial sums.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Dick said:
You can't regroup into three divergent series and then resum them to get a convergent series. The series isn't absolutely convergent and that doesn't have anything to do with the partial sums. Group the series into sums of three consecutive terms, then you can make some argument about the limit of the partial sums.

Thanks for your reply!
Is this something I am looking for?

(i) Considering [itex] s3,s6,s9,... [/itex]

[tex]
s_{3k} = 1+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{5}-\frac{2}{6}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{2}{9}+\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{11}-\frac{2}{12}+...+\frac{1}{3k-2}+\frac{1}{3k-1}-\frac{2}{3k} [/tex]
[tex]
=\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty (\frac{1}{3k-2} + \frac{1}{3k-1} - \frac{2}{3k}) [/tex]
[tex]
= \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{9k-4}{3k(3k-2)(3k-1))}
[/tex]

and I can prove convergence by comparison test.

Similarly, considering [itex] s2,s5,s8,... [/itex]
[tex]
s_{3k+2} = 1+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{5}-\frac{2}{6}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{2}{9}+\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{11}-\frac{2}{12}+...-\frac{2}{3k}+\frac{1}{3k+1}+\frac{1}{3k+2} [/tex]

[tex]
=1+\frac{1}{2}-\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty (\frac{2}{3k} + \frac{1}{3k+1} +\frac{1}{3k+2}) [/tex]
[tex]
= \frac{3}{2}-\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{9k+4}{3k(3k+1)(3k+2))}
[/tex]

and I can prove convergence by comparison test.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
ianwood said:
I think (s2,s3,s5,s6,s8,s9,...) is divergent.
You may be misinterpreting that notation. sn here is the sum of the first n terms of the original sequence. That does produce a convergent sequence.
 
  • #5
ianwood said:
Thanks for your reply!
Is this something I am looking for?

(i) Considering [itex] s3,s6,s9,... [/itex]

[tex]
s_{3k} = 1+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{5}-\frac{2}{6}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{2}{9}+\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{11}-\frac{2}{12}+...+\frac{1}{3k-2}+\frac{1}{3k-1}-\frac{2}{3k} [/tex]
[tex]
=\sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty (\frac{1}{3k-2} + \frac{1}{3k-1} - \frac{2}{3k}) [/tex]
[tex]
= \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{9k-4}{3k(3k-2)(3k-1))}
[/tex]

and I can prove convergence by comparison test.

Yes, the sequence {s3,s6,s9,...} must converge to some limit L by your comparison test. Now all you need to say is that the limit of {s1,s4,s7,...} and {s2,s5,s8,...} must converge to the same limit. The difference between ##s_{3n}## and ##s_{3n-1}## and ##s_{3n-2}## becomes vanishing small as n->infinity, doesn't it?
 

FAQ: Show that the sequence converges

1. What does it mean for a sequence to converge?

Convergence in mathematics refers to the behavior of a sequence as its terms get closer and closer to a specific value, called the limit of the sequence. In other words, if the terms of a sequence get arbitrarily close to a single value as the sequence progresses, then the sequence is said to converge.

2. How do you show that a sequence converges?

To show that a sequence converges, you must prove that the terms of the sequence get closer and closer to a specific limit value as the sequence progresses. This can be done using various convergence tests, such as the limit comparison test, the ratio test, or the root test. Additionally, you can also show convergence by using the definition of convergence, which involves proving that the terms of the sequence are within a certain distance from the limit as the sequence progresses.

3. What is the difference between absolute and conditional convergence?

Absolute convergence refers to a type of convergence where the terms of a sequence always get closer to a specific limit value, regardless of the order in which the terms are added. On the other hand, conditional convergence refers to a type of convergence where the terms of a sequence may get closer to a specific limit value only if they are added in a specific order. In other words, conditional convergence is dependent on the order of terms, while absolute convergence is not.

4. Can a sequence converge to more than one limit?

No, a sequence can only converge to a single limit. This is because the definition of convergence states that the terms of the sequence must get arbitrarily close to a specific value, and there can only be one value that the terms get arbitrarily close to.

5. Is convergence the same as continuity?

No, convergence and continuity are two different concepts in mathematics. Convergence refers to the behavior of a sequence, while continuity refers to the behavior of a function. While a sequence can converge to a specific limit value, a function can be continuous at a specific point, meaning that it is defined and has a value at that point. However, the two concepts are related, as a function is continuous at a point if and only if the sequence of values of the function at that point converges to the function's value at that point.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
989
Replies
4
Views
982
Replies
6
Views
901
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
801
Replies
5
Views
858
Back
Top