Show that the series ##\sum_{n=2}^\infty\dfrac {1}{n^2\ln (n)}##converges

  • Thread starter chwala
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Series
In summary: The series;##\dfrac{1}{1^2}+\dfrac{1}{2^2}+\dfrac{1}{3^2}+...+\dfrac{1}{n^2}##converges because,$$\lim_{n→∞} \ln\left [\dfrac{n}{n}\right]<\lim_{n→∞} \ln\left [\dfrac{1}{n}\right]$$
  • #36
BvU said:
Hey hey hey, I want some more attention for the typesetting :biggrin: !
  • use $$ instead of ## to get ##\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}## instead of ##\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \phantom{\Biggl | } ##
  • use \left [ and \right ] to get ##\left [\dfrac{n+1}{n}\right ]## instead of ##[\dfrac{n+1}{n}]##
##\ ##
Thanks a lot Bvu, I've learned quite a lot from you in regards to Latex...I will for sure diarize all the syntax in my notebook...I will equally amend my posts accordingly...
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
chwala said:
Thanks a lot BvU, I've learned quite a lot from you in regards to Latex...I will for sure diarize all the syntax in my notebook...I will equally amend my posts accordingly...
By the way, if you want to use LaTeX in the same line as normal text, but you want the look produced by $$, use the "\displaystyle" command. That is what @BvU used to get ##\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} ## to appear in a line of normal text.

You can also save some typing by using "\to" rather than "\rightarrow" for the arrow.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala and BvU
  • #38
SammyS said:
By the way, if you want to use LaTeX in the same line as normal text, but you want the look produced by $$, use the "\displaystyle" command. That is what @BvU used to get ##\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} ## to appear in a line of normal text.

You can also save some typing by using "\to" rather than "\rightarrow" for the arrow.
Am now a disciple of $$.:wink:
 
  • #39
chwala said:
Am now a disciple of $$.:wink:
I avoid $$ whenever possible.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes BvU
  • #40
SammyS said:
I avoid $$ whenever possible.
Noted Sammy ...cheers
 
  • #41
SammyS said:
I avoid $$ whenever possible.
Me, too. I'll use it if I have an equation I want to set off, but otherwise I will use ## so as to not incorporate a bunch of extraneous blank lines.
@SammyS, I didn't know that about displaystyle...
 
  • #42
Though It may be too late to join I would say
[tex]\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{(n+1)^2}<\int_1^\infty \frac{1}{x^2}dx=1<\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{n^2}[/tex]
and
[tex]\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{n^2}=1+\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{(n+1)^2}[/tex]
So
[tex]1<\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{n^2}<2[/tex]
, the series converges.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #43
Bvu/Sammy can you kindly post me an example of a problem posted with;
"\displaystyle" command (two lines will suffice)...i do not seem to get how the command should be typed...
Alternatively, I will just peruse your posts and see how you are using that.. I am a fast learner. Cheers mate:cool:
 
Last edited:
  • #44
SammyS said:
By the way, if you want to use LaTeX in the same line as normal text, but you want the look produced by $$, use the "\displaystyle" command. That is what @BvU used to get ##\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} ## to appear in a line of normal text.

You can also save some typing by using "\to" rather than "\rightarrow" for the arrow.
Right-click on this \lim thing !
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #45
anuttarasammyak said:
Though It may be too late to join I would say
...
Never too late ! And a nice warming-up for part (c) in this ##\TeX##/series convergence thread :smile: !
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
  • #46
I think we wwant @chwala to catch up first ...
It seems to me part (c) promises convergence ...
 
  • Haha
Likes chwala
  • #47
BvU said:
I think we wwant @chwala to catch up first ...
It seems to me part (c) promises convergence ...
Yes definitely, I'll be posting my findings soon...
 
  • #48
Similar to #42
[tex]\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{(n+1)^p}<\int_1^\infty \frac{1}{x^p}dx=[\frac{x^{1-p}}{1-p}]_1^\infty<\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{n^p}[/tex]
and
[tex]\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{n^p}=1+\sum_{n=1}\frac{1}{(n+1)^p}[/tex]
for p>0. So the series converges for p>1, e.g. p=1.01.
 
Last edited:
  • #49
Ok, for part ##c##,
The integral test can be used because;
1. series is continous.
2. series is easily integrable by use of improper integrals.
We want to check the convergence or divergence of,
$$\sum_{n=2}^\infty\left[\dfrac{1}{n\ln(n)}\right]$$ Using the integral test it follows that,
$$\int_2^\infty\left[\dfrac{1}{n\ln(n)}\right] dn=\lim_{m→∞}\int_2^m\left[\dfrac{1}{x\ln(x)}\right] dx$$
Let##u= \ln(x)## then ##du##=##\dfrac{1}{x}dx##, therefore
$$\lim_{m→∞}\int_2^m\left[\dfrac{1}{x\ln(x)}\right] dx=\lim_{m→∞}\int_2^m\left[\dfrac{du}{u}\right]=\lim_{m→∞}\left[\ln(\ln(m)-\ln(\ln2)\right]=∞$$
The integral diverges, therefore the series diverges.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BvU
  • #50
chwala said:
Using the integral test it follows that,
∫2∞[1nln⁡(n)]dn=limm→∞∫2m[1xln⁡(x)]dx
In more detail
[tex]\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{(n+1)\ln (n+1)}<\int_2^\infty\frac{1}{x \ln x}dx=[\ln(\ln x)]_2^\infty=+\infty< \sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n\ln n}[/tex]
and obviously
[tex]\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n\ln n}= \sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{(n+1)\ln (n+1)}+\frac{1}{2 \ln 2}[/tex]
So the series diverges.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BvU and chwala
  • #51
Hehe, so my playing advocate for the devil in #46 hasn't confused anyone but myself :frown: .
Well done @chwala and @anuttarasammyak !

##\ ##
 
  • #52
BvU said:
Hehe, so my playing advocate for the devil in #46 hasn't confused anyone but myself :frown: .
Well done @chwala and @anuttarasammyak !

##\ ##
Nice Bvu...Great Math community that we have here...I also noted that we can integrate ##\dfrac {1}{x\ln(x)}## using integration by parts...and realize the same result.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Back
Top