Show that x -> x^p is an automorphism in K

  • #1
Hill
733
573
Homework Statement
Let K be a finite field of characteristic p > 0. Show that x -> x^p is an automorphism in K.
Relevant Equations
s(x) = x^p
It is clear in case K is a prime field, because then s(x) is just an identity. If K is not prime, s(x) is identity on its prime subfield. But how to show the automorphism of s() for the rest of the field, when it's not prime?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hill said:
Homework Statement: Let K be a finite field of characteristic p > 0. Show that x -> x^p is an automorphism in K.
Relevant Equations: s(x) = x^p

It is clear in case K is a prime field, because then s(x) is just an identity. If K is not prime, s(x) is identity on its prime subfield. But how to show the automorphism of s() for the rest of the field, when it's not prime?
##s(x\cdot y)=(x\cdot y)^p=x^p\cdot y^p=s(x)\cdot s(y)## is obvious since ##K## is Abelian. To see that ##s(x+y)=s(x)+s(y)## use the binomial theorem. ##s(x)## is called Frobenius homomorphism.
 
  • #3
fresh_42 said:
##s(x\cdot y)=(x\cdot y)^p=x^p\cdot y^p=s(x)\cdot s(y)## is obvious since ##K## is Abelian. To see that ##s(x+y)=s(x)+s(y)## use the binomial theorem.
Thank you. It shows that s() is homomorphism. But how to show that it is injective and surjective in K?
 
  • #4
Hill said:
Homework Statement: Let K be a finite field of characteristic p > 0. Show that x -> x^p is an automorphism in K.
Relevant Equations: s(x) = x^p

It is clear in case K is a prime field, because then s(x) is just an identity. If K is not prime, s(x) is identity on its prime subfield. But how to show the automorphism of s() for the rest of the field, when it's not prime?
What about:

Suppose ##x^p = y^p##, then ##(xy^{-1})^p = 1##. Therefore ##xy^{-1}## has order ##1## or ##p##.

The order of the field is ##p^n##, hence the order of the multiplicative group is ##p^n -1##. As ##p## cannot divide ##p^n - 1##, the order of ##xy^{-1}## is ##1##. Hence ##x = y##, and the mapping is injective.
 
  • #5
PeroK said:
What about:

Suppose ##x^p = y^p##, then ##(xy^{-1})^p = 1##. Therefore ##xy^{-1}## has order ##1## or ##p##.

The order of the field is ##p^n##, hence the order of the multiplicative group is ##p^n -1##. As ##p## cannot divide ##p^n - 1##, the order of ##xy^{-1}## is ##1##. Hence ##x = y##, and the mapping is injective.
Thank you. This is good. Now, for the surjective part ...?
 
  • #6
Hill said:
Thank you. This is good. Now, for the surjective part ...?
That follows automatically for a finite set.
 
  • #7
PeroK said:
That follows automatically for a finite set.
I am sorry. I guess it should be obvious, but I don't see it. Could you elaborate, how?
 
  • #8
Hill said:
I am sorry. I guess it should be obvious, but I don't see it. Could you elaborate, how?
A mapping from a finite set to itself is injective iff it is surjective. You only have to count the elements in the range.
 
  • Like
Likes Hill
  • #9
PeroK said:
A mapping from a finite set to itself is injective iff it is surjective. You only have to count the elements in the range.
Thanks a lot. Just wanted to tell you that I got it, but you have already answered.
 
Back
Top