Show the relation when W is constant

In summary: Combining these two surface integrals, we get the right side of the equation:$$-\int_{\partial{W}}\rho \left (\frac{1}{2}|\overrightarrow{u}|^2+i\right )\overrightarrow{u} \cdot \overrightarrow{n}dA$$Therefore, we have shown that the left and right sides of the equation are equal, and we can conclude that In summary, we can use the divergence theorem to show that if the space $W$ is constant, then $$\frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}\left (\frac{1}{2}\rho |\overrightarrow{u}|^2+\rho \epsilon\right )d
  • #1
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
5,049
7
Hey! :eek:

If the space $W$ is constant (doesn't move with the flow), show that $$\frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}\left (\frac{1}{2}\rho |\overrightarrow{u}|^2+\rho \epsilon\right )dV=-\int_{\partial{W}}\rho \left (\frac{1}{2}|\overrightarrow{u}|^2+i\right )\overrightarrow{u} \cdot \overrightarrow{n}dA$$

where $p$ the pressure, $\rho$ the density, $\epsilon=i-\frac{p}{\rho}$ the internal energy per unit mass, $i$ the enthalpy.

How can we show that?? Do we have to use the divergence theorem?? (Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello! Yes, we can use the divergence theorem to show this relationship. Let's start by writing out the left side of the equation:

$$\frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}\left (\frac{1}{2}\rho |\overrightarrow{u}|^2+\rho \epsilon\right )dV$$

Using the product rule for differentiation, we can split this into two separate integrals:

$$\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}\rho |\overrightarrow{u}|^2 dV + \frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}\rho \epsilon dV$$

Now, we know that the density, $\rho$, is constant in this case since the space $W$ is not moving with the flow. Therefore, we can take it out of the integrals:

$$\frac{1}{2}\rho\frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}|\overrightarrow{u}|^2 dV + \rho\frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}\epsilon dV$$

Next, we can use the continuity equation, which states that $\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho \overrightarrow{u}) = 0$, to simplify the first integral:

$$\frac{1}{2}\rho\frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}|\overrightarrow{u}|^2 dV = -\frac{1}{2}\rho\int_{W}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} |\overrightarrow{u}|^2 dV$$

Using the divergence theorem, we can rewrite this as a surface integral over the boundary of $W$:

$$-\frac{1}{2}\rho\int_{\partial{W}}\rho |\overrightarrow{u}|^2 \overrightarrow{u} \cdot \overrightarrow{n} dA$$

Similarly, we can use the continuity equation to simplify the second integral:

$$\rho\frac{d}{dt}\int_{W}\epsilon dV = -\rho\int_{W}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} \epsilon dV$$

Again, using the divergence theorem, this becomes:

$$-\rho\int_{\partial{W}}\rho \epsilon \overrightarrow{u} \cdot \overrightarrow{n} dA
 

FAQ: Show the relation when W is constant

What is the significance of W being constant in a scientific experiment?

The constant value of W, also known as the independent variable, is an important factor in determining the relationship between two variables in an experiment. By keeping W constant, scientists can isolate its effect on the dependent variable and accurately determine the relationship between the two.

How do you show the relation when W is constant?

To show the relation when W is constant, scientists typically plot a graph with the dependent variable on the y-axis and the independent variable (W) on the x-axis. They then use a line or curve to connect the data points, which will show the pattern or relationship between the two variables.

Can the relation between two variables change if W is kept constant?

No, the relationship between two variables cannot change if W is kept constant. This is because the value of W is not affected by the changes in the dependent variable, so it does not influence the relationship between the two variables.

What are the advantages of keeping W constant in an experiment?

Keeping W constant allows scientists to accurately determine the relationship between two variables without any external factors influencing the results. It also allows for greater control over the experiment and helps to eliminate any confounding variables.

Are there any limitations to using a constant value of W in an experiment?

While keeping W constant has many benefits, it can also have limitations. In some experiments, it may not be possible to keep W constant due to practical or ethical constraints. Additionally, if the value of W is not chosen carefully, it may not accurately represent the real-world scenario being studied.

Similar threads

Back
Top