Showing a mapping between lie algebras is bijective

In summary, the map \varphi : \mathfrak{g} \to \mathfrak{h} is bijective, and the Lie bracket on \mathfrak{h} is defined as the matrix commutator: [X,Y] = XY - YX for any X,Y \in \mathfrak{h}.
  • #1
Ted123
446
0

Homework Statement



Show the map [itex]\varphi : \mathfrak{g} \to \mathfrak{h}[/itex] defined by

[itex]\varphi (aE + bF + cG) = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & a & c \\ 0 & 0 & b \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}[/itex]

is bijective.

[itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex] is the Lie algebra with basis vectors [itex]E,F,G[/itex] such that the following relations for Lie brackets are satisfied:

[itex][E,F]=G,\;\;[E,G]=0,\;\;[F,G]=0.[/itex]

[itex]\mathfrak{h}[/itex] is the Lie algebra consisting of 3x3 matrices of the form

[itex]\begin{bmatrix} 0 & a & c \\ 0 & 0 & b \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}[/itex] where [itex]a,b,c[/itex] are any complex numbers. The vector addition and scalar multiplication on [itex]\mathfrak{h}[/itex] are the usual operations on matrices.

The Lie bracket on [itex]\mathfrak{h}[/itex] is defined as the matrix commutator: [itex][X,Y] = XY - YX[/itex] for any [itex]X,Y \in \mathfrak{h}.[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



For showing [itex]\varphi[/itex] is 1-1 (injective) is this proof OK:

Letting [itex]x = aE+bF+cG \in \mathfrak{g}[/itex] and [itex]y = a'E+b'F+c'G \in \mathfrak{g}[/itex],

[itex]\varphi (x) = \varphi (y) \Rightarrow \begin{bmatrix} 0 & a & c \\ 0 & 0 & b \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & a' & c' \\ 0 & 0 & b' \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}[/itex]

[itex]\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\, \Rightarrow aE +bF+cG = a'E + b'F + c'G[/itex] [i.e. [itex]x=y[/itex]]

And [itex]\varphi[/itex] is onto (surjective) since [itex]\text{Im}(\varphi) = \mathfrak{h}[/itex] - how do you explictly show this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is sufficient to show that the kernel of [itex]\phi[/itex] is just the 0 vector. That is, if
[tex]\phi(x)= \begin{bmatrix}0 & a & c \\ 0 & 0 & b \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
then a= b= c= 0.
 
  • #3
HallsofIvy said:
It is sufficient to show that the kernel of [itex]\phi[/itex] is just the 0 vector. That is, if
[tex]\phi(x)= \begin{bmatrix}0 & a & c \\ 0 & 0 & b \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
then a= b= c= 0.

Is that for 1-1 or onto?

Doesn't [itex]\begin{bmatrix}0 & a & c \\ 0 & 0 & b \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix} \Rightarrow a= b= c= 0\;?[/itex] (just from looking at it)

From linear algebra that proves phi is 1-1. How about onto?
 
  • #4
To give a reason why [itex]\varphi[/itex] is surjective, can I just say that the images of any 2 of the basis vectors in [itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex] are clearly linearly independent, hence the image of [itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex] is all of [itex]\mathfrak{h}[/itex] ?
 

Related to Showing a mapping between lie algebras is bijective

1. What is a mapping between Lie algebras?

A mapping between Lie algebras is a mathematical function that preserves the structure and operations of two Lie algebras. It is a bijective map that establishes a one-to-one correspondence between elements of the two algebras.

2. How is bijectivity defined in the context of Lie algebras?

In the context of Lie algebras, bijectivity means that the mapping is both injective and surjective. This means that it is a one-to-one correspondence between elements of the first algebra and elements of the second algebra, and every element of the second algebra has a corresponding element in the first algebra.

3. Why is it important to show that a mapping between Lie algebras is bijective?

It is important to show that a mapping between Lie algebras is bijective because it ensures that the two algebras have the same structure and operations, and therefore are essentially the same. This allows for the study of one algebra to be applied to the other, making it easier to understand and manipulate the algebraic objects.

4. How is bijectivity proven in a mapping between Lie algebras?

Bijectivity in a mapping between Lie algebras can be proven by showing that the mapping is both injective and surjective. This can be done by using the properties of the Lie algebra and the mapping, and by demonstrating that every element of the first algebra has a unique corresponding element in the second algebra.

5. What are the implications of a non-bijective mapping between Lie algebras?

If a mapping between Lie algebras is not bijective, it means that the two algebras have different structures and operations. This can lead to difficulties in understanding and manipulating the algebras, and may limit the applicability of one algebra to the other. It also means that the two algebras are not equivalent, and cannot be treated as the same mathematical object.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
403
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
717
Back
Top