Showing a probability is of order (Dt)^2

  • MHB
  • Thread starter DinkyDoe
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Probability
In summary, the probability that we transition from state $C$ to state $O$ within the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ is of order $(\Delta t)^2$.
  • #1
DinkyDoe
2
0
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$P(T^+\leq s_1)$,
$P(T^-\leq s_2-s_1)$,
$P(T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2)$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independance...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

---------- Post added at 02:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------

DinkyDoe said:
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$T^+\leq s_1$,
$T^-\leq s_2-s_1$,
$T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independance...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

edit 2: sorry...think i solved it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
DinkyDoe said:
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$P(T^+\leq s_1)$,
$P(T^-\leq s_2-s_1)$,
$P(T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2)$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independance...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

---------- Post added at 02:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------



edit 2: sorry...think i solved it
It is very simple you are asking for the asymtotic form (as \( \Delta t \to 0\) ) of the cumulative distribution \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \), where we know the density:

\[f_{T^++T^-}(z)=\int_0^z \lambda_+e^{-\lambda_+(z-y)} \lambda_-e^{-\lambda_-y}dy\]

Both the required integrals are elementary, then a power series expansion of \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \) about \( \Delta t=0\) and you are done.

That is; the key idea here is that the density of the sum of two independant random variables is the convolution of their individual densities.

Now if you want that the probability that there is no further transition in the interval it does become a bit more complicated .. but an application of Bayes' theorem should do it.

CB
 
Last edited:
  • #3
CaptainBlack said:
It is very simple you are asking for the asymtotic form (as \( \Delta t \to 0\) ) of the cumulative distribution \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \), where we know the density:

\[f_{T^++T^-}(z)=\int_0^z \lambda_+e^{-\lambda_+(z-y)} \lambda_-e^{-\lambda_-y}dy\]

Both the required integrals are elementary, then a power series expansion of \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \) about \( \Delta t=0\) and you are done.

That is; the key idea here is that the density of the sum of two independant random variables is the convolution of their individual densities.

Now if you want that the probability that there is no further transition in the interval it does become a bit more complicated .. but an application of Bayes' theorem should do it.

CB
Thank you. Sounds cool, then you're actually using more advanced stuff. I did it in a more elementary way...I think I solved it correctly. I worked it out in Latex:

So we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O \to C$ within the time-interval $[0,\Delta t]$. Here we denote by $T^+$ the time between transition $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between transition $O\to C$, where $T^+\sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^-\sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ . Denote by $p^+(x)$ and $p^-(x)$ the corresponding density functions. Observe that we want to intgrate over all possible $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ such that $T^+\leq s_1$, $T^-\leq s_2-s_1$, and $T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2$ since we don't want to flip back $C\to O$ after $C\to O\to C$ within the time-interval $[0,\Delta t]$. This leads to the following integral $$ \int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$$
Calculating the integral gives us $$\left(\frac{\lambda_-}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left( \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_+}\right)\left(e^{(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t}-e^{-\lambda_-\Delta t}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left(e^{-\lambda_+\Delta t}-e^{(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t}\right)\right)$$Using the taylor expansion of $e^x$, we show that the above expression equals $O(\Delta t^2)$. That is, we show that in its Taylor expansion, the coefficients of $\Delta t^0$ and $\Delta t$ are zero, and the coefficient of $\Delta t^2$ is unequal to zero. We can forget the factor $\frac{\lambda_-}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}$. The case $\Delta t^0$ is obvious. We check that the coefficient of $\Delta t $ equals zero. Namely, observe that $$\left(\frac{1}{\lambda_+}\right)\left(\left(\lambda_+-\lambda_-\right)\Delta t+\lambda_-\Delta t\right)+ \left(\frac{1}{2\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left(-\lambda_+\Delta t+(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t\right) = \Delta t-\Delta t =0$$
After another straightforward verification, we find that the coefficient of $\Delta t^2$ equals $\frac{\lambda-}{2}\neq 0$. Therefore, for small intervals $[0,\Delta t]$ the probability of the event $[C\to O\to C]$ is $O(\Delta t^2)$.
 

FAQ: Showing a probability is of order (Dt)^2

1. What does it mean to show a probability is of order (Dt)^2?

When we say that a probability is of order (Dt)^2, it means that the probability is proportional to the square of the product of the time interval (Dt). This indicates that the probability increases as the time interval increases, and is a way to quantify how probable an event is to occur within a given time frame.

2. How do you calculate the order of a probability?

To calculate the order of a probability, we use the concept of asymptotic analysis. This involves taking the limit of the probability as the time interval (Dt) approaches zero. If the limit is a non-zero constant, then the probability is of order (Dt)^0, which means it is a constant probability. If the limit is proportional to (Dt), then the probability is of order (Dt)^1, and if the limit is proportional to (Dt)^2, then the probability is of order (Dt)^2.

3. What does it mean if a probability is of a higher order?

If a probability is of a higher order, such as (Dt)^3 or (Dt)^4, it means that the probability increases at a faster rate as the time interval increases. This indicates that the event is more likely to occur within a given time frame compared to a lower order probability.

4. Can probabilities of different orders be compared?

No, probabilities of different orders cannot be directly compared. The order of a probability only tells us about the relationship between the probability and the time interval. It does not provide information about the actual value of the probability itself. Therefore, two probabilities of different orders cannot be compared without knowing their specific values.

5. What are some real-world examples of probabilities of order (Dt)^2?

Some real-world examples of probabilities of order (Dt)^2 include the probability of a car accident occurring within a certain time frame, the probability of a stock market crash within a given period, and the probability of a disease outbreak within a specific time period. In all these cases, the probability increases as the time interval increases, and the relationship can be described by an order of (Dt)^2.

Similar threads

Back
Top