Showing Limit of xy^3/(x^2+y^2) = 0 using Definition

In summary, we can show that the limit of xy^3/(x^2+y^2) as (x,y) approaches (0,0) is equal to 0 by using the definition of the limit and converting the function to polar coordinates. By choosing a suitable value for delta, we can show that the difference between the function and the limit is less than epsilon. Therefore, the limit is indeed equal to 0.
  • #1
TheAntithesis
14
0

Homework Statement


Apply the definition of the limit to show that

lim (x,y)-->(0,0) xy^3/(x^2+y^2) = 0


Homework Equations


Definition of the limit:
lim (x,y)-->(a,b) f(x,y) = L if for every number epsilon > 0 there is a corresponding number delta > 0 such that if (x,y) is in the domain and 0 < sqrt((x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2) < delta then |f(x,y) - L| < epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I've just plugged in the numbers:

Let epsilon > 0. We want to find delta > 0 such that
if 0 < sqrt(x^2 + y^2) < delta then |xy^3/(x^2 + y^2) - 0| < epsilon

I have no idea what to do next.
Note that it says to show that this is the limit using the definition given above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is not true that the limit is 0.
If you let [itex]y=0[/itex] and [itex]x \to 0[/itex], we have the
[tex]\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{x} \ne 0[/tex]
 
  • #3
If y = 0 then xy^3 = 0 then xy^3/(x^2+y^2) = 0/x^2 = 0 so the limit must be 0
 
  • #4
u can't take limit of the numerator without taking limit of the denominator so u basically wrong
 
  • #5
Wolfram?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=lim+%28x%2Cy%29-%3E%280%2C0%29+xy^3%2F%28x^2+%2B+y^2%29
 
  • #6
sry my bad :D
 
  • #7
TheAntithesis said:
If y = 0 then xy^3 = 0 then xy^3/(x^2+y^2) = 0/x^2 = 0 so the limit must be 0

Oh yes, sure.
 
  • #8
I would switch to polar coordinates- that way the "distance to (0, 0)" is given by the single variable, r.

In polar coordinates, the function is
[tex]\frac{(r cos(\theta)(r sin(\theta))^3}{r^2}= r^2 cos(\theta)sin^3(\theta)[/tex]

Of course, [itex]|cos(\theta)sin^3(\theta)|\le 1[/itex] for all [itex]\theta[/itex].
 
  • #9
Ok let me know if this makes any sense at all...

After changing it to polar coordinates, we get [itex] \lim_{r \to 0} r^2 cos(\theta)sin^3(\theta)[/itex]

Let [itex]\epsilon > 0[/itex]. We want to find [itex]\delta > 0[/itex] such that

if [itex] 0<r< \delta[/itex] then [itex]|r^2 cos(\theta)sin^3(\theta) - 0| < \epsilon [/itex]

since [itex]|cos(\theta)sin^3(\theta)| \le 1[/itex] for all [itex]\theta[/itex]

[itex]r^2 cos(\theta)sin^3(\theta) \le r^2[/itex]

Thus if we choose [itex]\delta^2 = \epsilon[/itex] and let [itex]0<r<\delta[/itex] then

[itex]|r^2 cos(\theta)sin^3(\theta) - 0| \le r^2 \le \delta^2 = \epsilon[/itex]

And hence [itex] \lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} = 0 [/itex]
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Showing Limit of xy^3/(x^2+y^2) = 0 using Definition

What is the definition of a limit in calculus?

The definition of a limit in calculus is the value that a function approaches as the input values get closer and closer to a specific value, called the limit point. It is denoted by the notation "lim" and is used to describe the behavior of a function at a specific point.

How do you prove a limit using the definition?

To prove a limit using the definition, you must show that for any given positive number epsilon, there exists a corresponding positive number delta, such that when the distance between the input value and the limit point is less than delta, the difference between the output value and the limit is less than epsilon. This can be done by manipulating the given function and simplifying it until it fits the definition criteria.

What is the strategy for showing the limit of xy^3/(x^2+y^2) is equal to 0 using the definition?

The strategy for showing the limit of xy^3/(x^2+y^2) is equal to 0 using the definition is to first rewrite the function as y^3/(x+1) and then set the absolute value of the difference between the output value and 0 to be less than epsilon. From there, manipulate the expression to find a corresponding delta value that satisfies the definition criteria.

What is the significance of showing the limit of a function?

Showing the limit of a function is significant because it helps us understand the behavior of the function at a specific point. It allows us to make predictions about the function's output value as the input value gets closer and closer to the limit point. This is important in many applications of calculus, such as finding maximum and minimum values, determining continuity of a function, and solving optimization problems.

Can the limit of a function exist even if the function is not defined at that point?

Yes, the limit of a function can exist even if the function is not defined at that point. This is because the limit is concerned with the behavior of the function as the input values approach a specific point, not necessarily the value of the function at that point. However, if the function is not defined in a neighborhood around the limit point, then the limit does not exist.

Back
Top