Showing Non-Convergence of a Sequence in B_1

  • Thread starter Treadstone 71
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sequence
In summary, in the metric space (C[0,1],\rho_u), the unit ball B_1=\{f:\rho_u(f,0)\leq 1\} has a sequence g_n\in B_1 such that no subsequence of g_n converges in \rho_u. This can be proven by defining a sequence of functions that converge to a function outside of C[0,1], and showing that no subsequence of this sequence converges. Additionally, C[0,1] can be regarded as a subspace of B[0,1], but it is possible to prove this result more directly without considering any other space.
  • #1
Treadstone 71
275
0
Consider the unit ball [tex]B_1=\{f:\rho_u(f,0)\leq 1\}[/tex] in the metric space [tex](C[0,1],\rho_u)[/tex] where [tex]\rho_u(f,g)=sup\{\forall x(|f(x)-g(x)|)\}.[/tex] Show that there exists a sequence [tex]g_n\in B_1[/tex] such that NO subsequence of [tex]g_n[/tex] converges in [tex]\rho_u[/tex].

I want to know if what I'm doing is right. Suppose I define a sequence of functions that converge to a function OUTSIDE of C[0,1]=(the space of all continuous functions on 0,1), then any subsequence of such a function would not converge, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Right...
 
  • #3
But at no point did I use the fact that the function I defined doesn't converge in [tex]\rho_u[/tex].
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Well you're missing a lot of facts. I figured you would fill in the details, and you just wanted to know if your idea would work. So yes, it will work. C[0,1] is a subspace of B[0,1], the space of all bounded real-valued functions on [0,1]. You can give B[0,1] the same metric. Then there are some more easy details to work out, but you can do it. In fact, I don't know if you have to regard C[0,1] as a subspace of any other space, you can try to prove more directly that no subsequence converges.
 
  • #5
Great. Thanks.
 

FAQ: Showing Non-Convergence of a Sequence in B_1

What does it mean for a sequence to converge in B_1?

A sequence converges in B_1 if the elements of the sequence approach a specific value within a bounded interval. In other words, the values of the sequence get closer and closer to a particular number, and this number is within a certain range of values.

How do you show non-convergence of a sequence in B_1?

To show non-convergence of a sequence in B_1, you can use the definition of convergence and prove that the elements of the sequence do not approach a specific value within a bounded interval. This can be done by finding a specific value or interval that the elements of the sequence do not approach, or by finding a subsequence that does not converge.

Can a sequence converge in B_1 but not in B_2?

Yes, it is possible for a sequence to converge in B_1 but not in B_2. This is because the definitions of convergence in B_1 and B_2 are different. In B_1, the elements of the sequence must approach a specific value within a bounded interval, while in B_2, the elements of the sequence must approach a specific value regardless of the interval.

What is the difference between absolute convergence and convergence in B_1?

Absolute convergence refers to the convergence of a sequence regardless of the sign of the elements, while convergence in B_1 refers to the convergence of a sequence within a bounded interval. This means that a sequence can converge absolutely but not in B_1, and vice versa.

Why is it important to show non-convergence of a sequence in B_1?

Showing non-convergence of a sequence in B_1 is important because it provides information about the behavior of the sequence. If a sequence does not converge in B_1, it means that the elements of the sequence are not approaching a specific value within a bounded interval. This can help to identify patterns or irregularities in the sequence, which can be useful in understanding the underlying concepts or phenomena being studied.

Back
Top