Showing That $(AB)x = A(Bx)$: A Clue!

  • MHB
  • Thread starter evinda
  • Start date
In summary, we can show that $(AB)x=A(Bx)$ by using the distributive law and the definition of matrix multiplication. This equality also implies that the composition of the functions $x \to Bx$ and $y \to Ay$ is equivalent to the multiplication of the matrices $A$ and $B$.
  • #1
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
3,836
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to show that if $A$ and $B$ are two $n \times n$ matrices and $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$, then $(AB) x=A(B x)$.

What do we deduce from the above equality for the relation between the composition of the functions $x \to Bx, y \to Ay$ and the multiplication of matrices?Could you give me a hint how we could show that $(AB) x=A(B x)$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So,
$$(Bx)_i=\sum_{j=1}^n B_{ij}x_j,$$
and
$$(AB)_{ki}=\sum_{l=1}^n A_{kl}B_{li}.$$
Can you continue?
 
  • #3
Ackbach said:
So,
$$(Bx)_i=\sum_{j=1}^n B_{ij}x_j,$$
and
$$(AB)_{ki}=\sum_{l=1}^n A_{kl}B_{li}.$$

So $k$ is the row and $i$ the column, right?

So do I have to find now the form of $(AB)_{ki} x_i$ ?
 
  • #4
The $i$-th coordinate of $Bx$ is:

$\sum\limits_j b_{ij}x_j$ <----this sum is a scalar, we wind up with $i$ different scalar entries of $Bx$.

Notice that for this to even make sense, the "$j$" 's must match up: $B$ must have the same number of COLUMNS, as $x$ has ROWS ($x$ is taken to be a column-vector, so it only has 1 column, considered as a matrix).

Now we "hit this with $A$". We use $A = (a_{ki})$, since, again, for this to be well-defined, we must have that $A$ has $i$ columns, as $Bx$ has $i$ entries (rows).

Now, $A(Bx)$ will have $k$ entries, the $k$-th entry will be:

$[A(Bx)]_k = \sum\limits_i a_{ki}(Bx)_i = \sum\limits_i a_{ki}\left(\sum\limits_j b_{ij}x_j \right)$.

Using the distributive law, we can rewrite the above as:

$= \sum\limits_i \sum\limits_j a_{ki}b_{ij}x_j$

and using the distributive law AGAIN, to collect all the $x_j$ terms, for each $j$:

$= \sum\limits_j \left(\sum\limits_i a_{ki}b_{ij}\right)x_j$

Now, the stuff in the parentheses is the $k,j$-th entry of $AB$ (by the definition of matrix multiplication), so we have:

$[A(Bx)]_k = [(AB)x]_k$, for each $k$.

It easier to see what is going on with specific values for $k,i,j$: so let's say $A$ is a 3x2 matrix, and $B$ is a 2x2 matrix.

So we start with a 2-vector: $(x_1,x_2)$.

Then $Bx = (b_{11}x_1 + b_{12}x_2, b_{21}x_1 + b_{22}x_2)$.<---a different 2-vector now.

Now $A(B(x)) =
(a_{11}(b_{11}x_1 + b_{12}x_2) + a_{12}(b_{21}x_1 + b_{22}x_2),
a_{21}(b_{11}x_1 + b_{12}x_2) +a_{22}(b_{21}x_1 + b_{22}x_2),
a_{31}(b_{11}x_1 + b_{12}x_2) + a_{32}(b_{21}x_1 + b_{22}x_2))$

$=((a_{11}b_{11} + a_{12}b_{21})x_1 + (a_{11}b_{12} + a_{12}b_{22})x_2,
(a_{21}b_{11} + a_{22}b_{21})x_1 + (a_{21}b_{12} + a_{22}b_{22})x_2,
(a_{31}b_{11} + a_{32}b_{21})x_1 + (a_{31}b_{12} + a_{32}b_{22})x_2)$

Note how all the "grouped terms" are entries of the matrix $AB$, for example:

$(a_{11}b_{11} + a_{12}b_{21}$ is the $1,1$-entry of $AB$, and $a_{11}b_{12} + a_{12}b_{22}$ is the $1,2$-entry of $AB$, and so on,

so that we have the above is $(AB)x$.
 

FAQ: Showing That $(AB)x = A(Bx)$: A Clue!

What is the purpose of showing that $(AB)x = A(Bx)$?

The purpose of showing this equation is to demonstrate the associative property of matrix multiplication. This property states that the order in which matrices are multiplied does not affect the final result.

Can you provide an example of how to show that $(AB)x = A(Bx)$?

Yes, for example, let A be a 3x2 matrix and B be a 2x4 matrix. If we let x be a column vector with 4 elements, then $(AB)x$ would result in a 3x1 matrix, while $A(Bx)$ would also result in a 3x1 matrix. This shows that the two expressions are equal.

How is the associative property useful in matrix multiplication?

The associative property allows us to change the order in which matrices are multiplied, which can make calculations more efficient and also helps us to understand the relationship between different matrices.

Are there any exceptions to the associative property in matrix multiplication?

Yes, the associative property only holds true for square matrices. For non-square matrices, the order of multiplication can affect the final result.

How does showing that $(AB)x = A(Bx)$ relate to other properties of matrix multiplication?

This equation is closely related to the distributive property of matrix multiplication, which states that $(A+B)x = Ax + Bx$. Together, these properties help us to better understand how matrix multiplication works and how we can manipulate matrices in equations.

Similar threads

Replies
52
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
573
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top