- #1
qLinusq
- 2
- 0
Hello,
In the book physical chemistry (P. Atkins & Julio de Paula, 2009, 5 ED) the authors derive a justification of the Schrödinger equation.
1.) [tex]\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m} \frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}}+V(x)\psi=E \psi[/tex]
The derivation goes as follows:
Derivation:
We can justify the form of the Schrödinger equation to a certain extent by showing that it implies the de Broglie relation for a freely moving particle.
By free motion we mean motion in a region where the potential energy is zero (V=0 everywhere).
If V=0, equation 1 simplifies to:
2.) [tex]\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m} \frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}}=E \psi[/tex]
So far all good, however they then present a solution to equation 2. without showing how they obtained it.
The solution is:
[tex]\psi=sin(kx)[/tex]
[tex]k=\frac{(2mE)^{2}}{\hbar}[/tex]
I have no problem understanding that this is a valid solution however i would like to derive it myself.
Could you provide me with the derivation to the solution of equation 2?
/Thanks in advance,
Linus.
In the book physical chemistry (P. Atkins & Julio de Paula, 2009, 5 ED) the authors derive a justification of the Schrödinger equation.
1.) [tex]\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m} \frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}}+V(x)\psi=E \psi[/tex]
The derivation goes as follows:
Derivation:
We can justify the form of the Schrödinger equation to a certain extent by showing that it implies the de Broglie relation for a freely moving particle.
By free motion we mean motion in a region where the potential energy is zero (V=0 everywhere).
If V=0, equation 1 simplifies to:
2.) [tex]\frac{-\hbar^{2}}{2m} \frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}}=E \psi[/tex]
So far all good, however they then present a solution to equation 2. without showing how they obtained it.
The solution is:
[tex]\psi=sin(kx)[/tex]
[tex]k=\frac{(2mE)^{2}}{\hbar}[/tex]
I have no problem understanding that this is a valid solution however i would like to derive it myself.
Could you provide me with the derivation to the solution of equation 2?
/Thanks in advance,
Linus.